英语食品科技论文的特点与写作

㈠ 跪求食品科学专业的英文论文。。。

食品科学专业的英文论文。
咋们一切都好说的 要吗

㈡ 你认为英文科技论文的写作和中文科技论文有哪些区别

拿文科来说，好处来也是很多的自，比如：①学文科的人能说会道、出口成章，知识广博，交际能力强等；②更有利于形成独立思考、明辨是非的能力。要想培养这个能力是很难单靠推导数学定理、做物理实验或者设计电路图能养成的，更多是靠在人文学科上的一些总结和积累（比如以史为鉴）。③让自己变成一个更有趣味的人。多学习一些文科的知识，比如阅读文学书籍、学习绘画、电影鉴赏等等，可以让自己变得不那么死板、更有趣味一些，往往能把自己的生活经营的更有乐趣

㈢ 英文论文的写作要点和注意事项

在很多学生学习英语当中,不知道英语的初中作文应该怎么写,对此感到非常的烦恼,并且因为这个原因拉低了这个科目的整体分数,那么英语初中作文应该怎么写?

英语词语的用法

以上就是英语初中作文怎么写的内容,在经过以上的建议学习之后,在写作的方面会有一定的提升,并且这个科目的分数可以有一定的改善,当然见到成效之后需要坚持才可以.

㈣ 急求一篇有关“学习科技英语心得”或“科技英语的特点”的英语论文，求求大家了

Agriculture

Technologies

900 Million Farmers in China

The history of reform and opening up has witnessed three calls for the development of rural markets. 900 million farmers constitute the world's largest group of consumers and have created the biggest business opportunity in China.

In the face of the al competitive pressure posed to China by the hi-tech advantage of the developed countries and the price advantage resulted from the currency devaluation in surrounding countries, China has clearly indicated: From the long-term point of view, while actively exploring international markets, it is essential to actively develop the domestic market, particularly the rural market. This is a strategic choice in conformity with China's national conditions.

The rural market is the most dynamic, practical pivotal point in expanding domestic demands and boosting economic growth. Inadequate effective demand has become the greatest hindrance to China's current economic development. In the series of macro-control measures to be adopted in the second half of this year, exploring the rural market is regarded as "a rope for capturing the tiger". Experts' estimation indicates: Every 100 billion yuan worth of final consumption realized in rural areas will generate 235.6 billion yuan worth of consumption demand for the entire national economy.

It is also a brand-new starting-point in the readjustment of economic structure and the readjustment of proct mix. Today, the buyer's market has penetrated to every corner of China's economy. Of the 900-odd important instrial procts, the utilization rate of over half of the proction capacity is less than 50 percent, structural readjustment is thus imminent.

In the effort to successfully open up the rural market, instrial enterprises must proce commodities geared to rural demands; and commercial enterprises must skillfully build smooth and swift marketing channels.

There are many difficulties confronting the effort to explore rural markets. Reasons for this are many. For example, some local governments have inadequate understanding of the importance and urgency of exploring rural markets, fear difficulty and lack confidence in accomplishing this task; quite a number of instrial and commercial enterprises still harbor the concept of "valuing cities while belittling the countryside", this is manifested in the fact that the proct mix is incompatible with the rural market demand, the variety of commodities on sale is single and farmers find it inconvenient to buy.

In fact, the rural market has enormous potential and there are many favorable conditions for developing the rural market. So long as instrial and commercial enterprises really attach importance to the rural market, carefully study farmers' demands, exert great efforts to do a good job in the work of exploring the rural market well, they can definitely achieve the anticipated results.

Instrial enterprises stress proction of commodities geared to market needs, while commercial enterprises emphasize smooth and fast marketing channels.

Efforts should be made to develop new sales methods, such as chain-store, agency and distribution center and to establish various forms of sales networks wherein instry and commerce, commerce and commerce, town and country, state-owned commerce and indivially-run and privately-run commerce join hands. Chinese business people will have ample scope for their abilities in rural markets.

The key to success in exploring rural markets lies in increasing farmers' income. It is necessary to open up the rural consumer goods market to allow farmers to buy things; and it is also necessary to first open up the rural agricultural proce market, so that farmers' purses will be bulging

Farmers' income is stepping into the period of a new round of growth at reced rate.

Slow increase in farmers' income is the greatest factor thwarting efforts to explore rural markets. When farmers' purses are not so bulging, increase in actual consumption demand will be slow. To increase farmers' income is, in essence, to enhance the rural economy's adaptability to the socialist market economy. In the opinions of authoritative persons, it is essential to get hold of two links: one is "what to grow". Farmers have to grow farm crops easy to yield added value.

To do so, it is necessary to readjust and optimize the agricultural structure, develop high-efficiency and high-value-added characteristic agriculture. Second is "how to sell the proce". To increase farmers' income, it is essential to solve the problem concerning ties between the farmer and the market, farmers should be enabled to smoothly enter the big, ever-changing market. This requires development of instrial management of agriculture, and cultivation of a wholesale market system, intermediary service system and information service system.

Cultivating a wholesale trading market system by making use of the advantages of tradition, regional location, resources and instry is an important aspect in invigorating the flow of agricultural proce and instrial procts. This has been proved by the experience of many localities.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

China May Hold Future of Food Technology

By Dennis Avery
Senior fellow and Director, Center for Global Food Issues at the Hudson Institute

Is it possible the First World will give China a virtual monopoly in agricultural biotechnology, destined to be one of the most valuable technologies of the 21st century?

Have the United States and Europe thrown away billions of dollars in agriculture-related biotech earnings and hundreds of thousands of clean, high-tech research and support jobs?

The United States and Europe have spent billions of dollars doing basic research in genetically modified crops and animals to make foods that are better-tasting, more nutritious and kinder to the environment.

Will China now step in and charge the United States and Europe steep royalties for the right to grow the new organisms that result from this research?

Those are all strong possibilities, in the wake of the environmental group Greenpeace's stunningly swift and successful campaign to ban genetically modified foods and crops.

First World investors were afraid to be caught in another controversy like tobacco, or another set of baseless class-action lawsuits like the controversy over silicone breast implants.

They've led out on agricultural biotechnology long before governments dared act. To ck the controversy, Monsanto's orphaned agricultural biotech unit will be mped into a hostile stock market along with its multibillion-dollar laboratories and patents.

Ditto for the big agricultural biotech units of Europe's Novartis and Zeneca. Look for layoffs from all three. And don't expect the laid-off scientists to land jobs at public research institutions.

The publicly funded research labs will be even more gun-shy of agricultural biotechnology now than the private sector. The erstwhile scientists will have to lay aside their doctorates and start new careers.

A lucky few may find jobs in human medical biotech, which the environmental movement has not attacked yet. This has nothing to do with risks to people or the environment. Despite media hype, no real dangers related to biotech foods have ever been documented.

But Greenpeace seems to want a smaller, poorer human population, so they're willing to frighten the world back into the scientific Dark Ages. The one thing certain is genetic engineering in food proction will not disappear.

When the astronomer Galileo published his proofs in 1632 that the Earth revolved around the sun, the Catholic Church put him under house arrest. The church had declared the Earth the center of the universe. But people could never look at the sun in quite the same way again. They had new knowledge.

The First World may be so comfortable it can afford to pass up biotech foods. But the Third World is still struggling to provide adequate diets for its growing population.

For the developing world, the choices are stark. The can either use biotechnology to raise yields, grow more low-yield crops by clearing tropical forests or import food from the West. Given those choices, biotech foods look awfully attractive.

Most Third World countries are too small or poor to advance agricultural biotechnology on their own. Countries like Brazil and Argentina could assemble the scientific resources but they're afraid of losing their export sales to nervous European and Japanese consumers.

India might like to develop high-yielding biotech crops to ease its cropland shortage, but its own prickly activists are still arguing over hybrid seeds. They're likely to hamstring Indian biotech into the near foreseeable future.

China is the one country in the world with the scientific power to carry biotechnology forward in agriculture, the urgent need for massive amounts of additional food and feed and no need to allow unfounded food scares to be published in its newspapers.

China already has over 1 million farmers growing genetically modified cotton, corn and soybeans because of lower costs. Anyone who doubts China's ability to carry forward good science is ignoring the country's fabulous history and its recent ballistic missile tests.

"Golden rice" by itself may be enough to secure genetically engineered foods' reputation among Chinese consumers. Asian women are at high risk of birth complications because of iron deficiency e to the phytate in the rice they eat.

Golden rice counteracts the phytate and provides ample dietary iron. It also contains plenty of Vitamin A, also lacking in many rice-culture diets.

The International Rice Research Institute is already breeding golden rice genes into popular rice varieties for the people of Asia and Africa. Is Greenpeace callous enough to try to frighten poor rice-culture consumers away from golden rice and back to childhood blindness?

Using biotechnology, China should be able to proce highly attractive foods, such as healthier fats for cooking, allergy-free nuts, more tender steaks and, at last, a tasty off-season tomato.

Every vitamin and mineral needed by the human body could be engineered into our foods, saving consumers billions of dollars in food supplements.

When First World consumers find out about such goodies, China can export them or charge farmers in other countries a fee to grow them.

The biotech crops will also feature sharply higher yields, especially on marginal farmlands where drought and acid soils currently limit proction. Greenpeace should cheer this, since it will directly help save Asian tropical forests.

First World farmers will lose a significant part of their export potential, of course, if Third World farmers can proce higher yields and more desirable specialty foods through biotechnology. At the moment, that seems to be the price they pay for farming in a rich, overfed country.
参考资料：http://www.index-china.com/index-english/agr-tech-s.html

㈤ 我要写科技英语的论文，想请问一下，食品名称的翻译能不能写啊：）

应该是可以的吧！毕竟是科技论文，这些都是必不可少的

㈥ 英文科技论文写作怎么写

一般碰到这种的很浪费时间，我都交给海硕之星论文帮忙，我的同学们都是在那找人帮写的;

㈦ 求一篇英语关于饮食习惯的论文

Do you have a balanced diet?are you health?The doctor said we must keep
healthy.So we must keep the balance of yin and yang.If you are weak,you should
eat hot yang foods.

if you are always angry,maybe you should eat yin foods.How do you feel?It’s
important for us to keep health.

㈧ 英语撰写科技论文的结果部分，需要注意哪些语言表达及写作技巧方面的问题

分清中心论点和分论点：分论一般位于段首或有标志性词语：首先、其专次、第三等
第四、要注意论点属的表述形式：有时题目就是中心论点。一篇议论文只有一个中心论点。
第五、通过论据来反推论点：论据是为证明论点服务的，分析论据可以看出它证明什么，肯定什么，支持什么，这就是论点。