⑴ 英语辩论赛 主持人说话中的术语
辩论赛 debate
辩手 debater
正方 positive side
反方 negative side
⑵ 英语辩论赛 正方一辩的开场白
各位同学、今晚的辩论赛即将开始.
有请队员入场.
首先入场的是正方 *** ,他们的立场是 *** .他们的辩手是:……
现在入场的是反方 *** ,他们的立场是 *** .他们的辩手是:……
今天晚上,我们举行的是:****辩论赛 ,欢迎各位辩手和同学们的到来，希望双方在今晚的比赛中都有出色的表现。
让我们用热烈的掌声请出今晚到场的评委,他们是:……
感谢各位评委的到来，今晚的辩题是“ .”我们有人说” .”也有人说:” .”谁是谁非呢.台下的同学想必早已经如饥似渴.再看台上的辩手,哈,也早已磨刀霍霍了.
1.好，我们进入比赛的第一部分，立论阶段，看双方如何摆开阵势（介绍规则，时间）有请正方立论…….
恩，正方X辩真是激情满怀，下面有请反方辩手进行立论……..
2.好，看来双方战略以定，接下来进入我们的盘问阶段……..
3.双方真可谓是兵来将挡，运筹帷幄，精彩的盘论过后，下面进入我们的驳论阶段…….
4.看来双方真是不分上下，寸不不让啊。现在到了现场提问的时间了，大家要把握机会啊……..
5.感谢观众的提问，看来万事具备，东风又来，该是短兵相接了，再进入我们最精彩的自由答辩吧…….
6.好一场精彩而又激烈的答辩，双方各不示弱，气势逼人啊，那就赶快进入我们最后的总结陈辞阶段吧，看双方如何乘胜追击，保住胜果，还是卧薪尝胆，卷土重来，反败为胜…….
7.好了，本场比赛也快结束了，谁胜谁负呢，评委自有公决，现在请评委退场
8.现在是观众提问时间，任何观众对任何辩手最多可以提一个问题，还不赶快行动……
9.好，观众提问就到这里。现在请xx老师为本场比赛点评
10. 结果出来了，谁胜谁负这个答案已在我的手上了，大家说谁获胜了呢……看来大家还是唯我独尊，没有大公无私的精神啊。看来大家的团队精神值得表扬。现在我宣布比赛结果，本次的优秀辩手是….获胜的是…好本场比赛到此结束。请同学们细心留意我们的海报，不要错过下场比赛哦
⑶ 英语口语辩论赛有用句型
你这个题目很宽泛。。有个英语辩论赛技巧的帖子，希望能对你有用 On Debating Clarity: Avoise of terms which can be interpreted differently by different readers.When we are talking to people who substantially agree with us we canuse such terms as "rednecks" or "liberals" and feel reasonably surethat we will be understood. But in a debate, we are talking to peoplewho substantially disagree with us and they are likely to put adifferent interpretation on such words. Evidence:Quoting an authority is not evidence. Quoting a majority opinion is notevidence. Any argument that starts with, "According to Einstein..." isnot based on objective evidence. Any argument that starts with, "Mostbiologists believe..." is not based on objective evidence. Saying, "TheBible says..." is not evidence. Authorities and majorities can be wrongand frequently have been. （历届辩论赛中出现最多的问题） Emotionalism: Avoidemotionally charged words--words that are likely to proce more heatthan light. Certainly the racial, ethnic, or religious hate words haveno place in rational debating. Likewise, avoid argumentum ad hominem.Personal attacks on your opponent are an admission of intellectualbankruptcy. Also, slurs directed at groups with whom your opponent isidentified are usually nonproctive. Try to keep attention centered onthe objective problem itself. There is a special problem when debatingsocial, psychological, political, or religious ideas because a person'stheories about these matters presumably have some effect on his ownlife style. In other words, rather than saying "and that's why you aresuch an undisciplined wreck" say, "a person adopting your position is,I believe, likely to become an undisciplined wreck because ..." Causality: Avoid the blunder of asserting a causal relationship with the popular fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hocwhich declares that because some event A happened and immediatelyafterward event B happened that event A was the cause of event B.(Iknew someone whose car stalled on the way to work. She would get outand open the hood and slam it and then the car would start. Singing asong would have been just as effective to allow time for a vapor lockto dissipate!) Also avoid the popular fallacy that correlation provescausation. People who own Cadillacs, on average, have higher incomesthan people who don't. This does not mean that if we provided peoplewith Cadillacs that they would have higher incomes. Innuendo(影射):Innuendois saying something pejorative about your opponent without coming rightout and saying it but by making more or less veiled allusions to somecircumstance, rumor, or popular belief. If you want to see someexcellent examples of innuendo, watch Rush Limbaugh. Politicians are,unfortunately, frequently guilty of using innuendo. It is an easy wayto capitalize on popular prejudices without having to make explicitstatements which might be difficult or impossible to defend againstrational attack. Besure of your facts. What is the source of your information? If it is anewspaper or a magazine, are you sure that the information hasn't been"slanted" to agree with that publication's political bias? Wherecrucial facts are concerned, it is best to check with more than onesource. Often international publications will give you a differentperspective than your hometown newspaper. Check to see whether the bookyou are using was published by a regular publishing company or whetherit was published by some special interest group like the John BirchSociety or a religious organization. These books cannot be trusted topresent unbiased evidence since their motivation for publishing is nottruth but rather the furtherance of some political or religious view. Understandyour opponents' arguments. It is good practice to argue with a friendand take a position with which you do not agree. In this way you maydiscover some of the assumptions your opponents are making which willhelp you in the debate. Remember that everybody thinks that hisposition is the right one, and everybody has his reasons for thinkingso. Do not impute ridiculous or malevolent ideas to your opponent. An example of this is the rhetorical statement, "Haveyou stopped beating your wife?" This imputes or presupposes that youropponent has beaten his wife. One frequently sees references byconservative speakers and writers to the idea that gay activists want"special privileges." This would be ridiculous if it were true. Itisn't true, but speaking as if it were true and well known to all isegregiously unfair to listeners or readers who may not be wellinformed. It is probably always wise to treat your opponent withrespect, even if he doesn't deserve it. If he doesn't deserve respect,this will probably soon become obvious enough. Regression to the mean(逻辑退化):Another source of error which occurs very frequently is the failure totake into account regression to the mean. This is a bit technical, butit is very important, especially in any kind of social or psychologicalresearch which depends upon statistical surveys or even experimentswhich involve statistical sampling. Rather than a general statement ofthe principle (which becomes more and more unintelligible as thestatement becomes more and more rigorous) an example will be used. Let's consider intelligence testing. 1.Perhaps we have a drug that is supposed to raise the IQ of mentallyretarded kids. So we give a thousand intelligence tests and select the30 lowest scoring indivials. 2. We then give these low scoring kids our drug and test them again. 3. We find that there has been an increase in the average of their IQ scores. 4. Is this evidence that the drug increased the IQ? Notnecessarily! Suppose we want to show that smoking marijuana lowers theIQ. Well, we take the 30 highest scoring kids in our sample and givethem THC and test them again. We find a lower average IQ. Is this evidence that marijuana lowers the IQ? Notnecessarily! Any statistician knows that if you make some kind of ameasurement of some attribute of a large sample of people and thenselect the highest and lowest scoring indivials and make the samemeasurement again, the high scoring group will have a lower averagescore and the low scoring group will have a higher average score thanthey did the first time. This is called "regression to the mean" and itis a perfectly universal statistical principle. Thereare undoubtedly more points to be made here. Suggestions will begratefully received. Larry has made the following suggestions: · Apply the scientific method. （运用科学方法） · Cite relevant personal experience. （合理引用相关的个人经历） · Be polite. （辩论过程中有礼待人） · Organize your response. (Beginning, middle, end.) （对你辩词进行合理的组织） · Treat people as indivials. · Cite sources for statistics and studies used. · Literacy works. Break posts into sentences and paragraphs. · Read the post you are responding to. Stay open to learning
⑷ 英语主持人辩论赛常用台词
一辩，二辩
Debater Number 1
Debater Number 2
评委团：judges
题目 Debating Competition
开头：welcome to the debating competition of the issue "题目" we have 6 debaters today, 3 on each side, and they are"名字”
now lets begin.开始 Good morning/afternoon/evening ladies and gentleman(or students),contestants and adjudicators(裁判).Today we are debating the topic (报一下辩论题目) On the affirmative side we have (报一下正方参赛者的顺序),and on the negative side we have (反方参赛者的顺序).
Both teams have showed great debating ability in today's fierce competition. Let us now await for the adjudicator's scoring. I am sure it is going to be very close.And I think all contestants need to be congratulated for their outstanding efforts.
The score is in, and the winner of today's debate is (报赢的一方)
Than you all for coming.
⑸ 求英语辩论赛主持人发言稿。
start:
today we are talking about happiness.
To some, happiness is being surrounded by family and friends. to others, happiness means achieving success in something, such as meeting a goal. to those who have been injured or struggle with a physical disability, happiness can simply mean a day without pain or just being alive.
well, let's see what our students are thinking of happiness.
yes, as we can be happiness cannot leave a sufficient money support, however, are people only motivated by money?
now let's move on to the - free talk part
last bit - conclusion part , let's see if any of them can give a strong support for their topic
⑹ 英语辩论赛主持人台词
一辩，二辩
Debater Number 1
Debater Number 2
评委团：judges
题目回 Debating Competition
开头：welcome to the debating competition of the issue "题目" we have 6 debaters today, 3 on each side, and they are"名字”
now lets begin.开始答
⑺ 英语辩论赛的开场白和结束语
赛制是自什么?你们打的什么位置?开场白...先问好...然后可以说Today, I'm here, proudly pro/against the motion which is... 正一的话可以先解释一下立这个motion的理由（如果是议会制辩论）或者做出界定，除了正一，大部分陈述应该包括rebuttal part和constructive part.正/反方最后一个人还可以对这场辩论做一个summary,总结一下本场中双方的clash或者是比较一下双方的打点,并根据自己总结的各点阐明本方对主要的clash做出了哪些贡献提供了什么样的理论依据,而对方怎么样没能对他们的论点提出论据或者论据如何不足以证实他方观点...开场白可以先说明自己的提纲,比如my speech today consists of * parts, 1st rebuttal, then constructive,(根据自己的内容角色做出调整),然后结束的话把自己的主要观点及阐释部分各用一句话再做回顾,说明自己观点.最后一个人还可以上升一下高度,结尾用点小煽情的^^~
希望能帮到你~~~
⑻ 英语辩论赛中主持人应该说些什么
这个网址给你，是抄中文的辩袭论赛主持词，你可以参考一下
http://www.flgw.cn/yanjiang/zhuchi/200602/30679.html
中文怎么说，英文也怎么说，你可以先想一下，主持中文的比赛要说什么，然后再翻译成英语
welcome
to
English
Debating
Competiton
etc
⑼ 英语辩论赛"以貌取人"的主持人稿
judge people with their appearance