考研英语冲刺阅读理解

1. 考研英语阅读怎么复习，现在明白还不晚

1.难词，难句的梳理
所谓的难词难句对于不同的学生来讲，内容将是不同的。但所指的就是在前期做的过程中影响到阅读，影响到理解，和影响到题目正确率的所有的字词句。尤其是高频的，常考的词与重点语法结构，以及题目过程中自己做错的原因。
2.题目的梳理
在所有的题目中，按照题型分类，主旨题，例证题，推断题，词汇题，观点态度题分别有着怎样的解题思路和注意事项。
比如：选项当中有一种错误选项的典型特点是：比较结构的出现。每当碰到的时候要多加小心，因为通常情况下原文并没有涉及到两者之间的比较，但是选项却出现了，并且这种考察方式是及其不容易察觉的，所以要多加小心。但是任何说法都不会是绝对的，关键得看原文细节到底有无涉及。
对于那些阅读理解一直稳定在每篇错两到三个题目的同学
想要突破，想要提高，每天只是机械的重复做题并没有什么用，重要的是要分析做错的每一道题，找到自己出错的根本原因。
首先归纳下，你什么类型的题目总做错，做错的原因是什么?是分不清题型、不知道如何定位?还是定位句子看不明白?或者是定位句子看得懂，可是和四个选项比对时建立不起来和正确选项之间的逻辑关联，看不出来定位句子和选项之间的必然联系?
只有知道具体问题出在哪，才能更接近解决问题的本质，才能提高，分析出自己的问题。那么就有针对性的练习，提高自己薄弱的环节，哪个环节薄弱就练哪里。其实，更多的考生是出在最后一个环节，就是定位句子和正确选项之间联系不起来，往往四个选项排除两个，剩下两个纠结的，然后就选错了，那么现在教你一招：拿出真题，别的不干，就分析定位句子和正确选项之间的关联，再分析下让你特别纠结的那个选项到底为什么不对，错在哪里，如何干扰你的，认真分析之后一定有提高!
对那些觉得阅读真题都记得答案的同学。
有同学说，真题都看了好几遍了，每道题的答案都知道是哪一个，也知道在文章中的定位在哪里，不知道再看还要看什么。
当你第一遍做真题时，你的侧重点往往在于对文章内容和句子意思的理解，做题时也往往是一道题做完基本所对应的那一段都看差不多了，也就是说基本是按照自己的传统方法做的，这样一篇文章坐下来应该不止18分钟吧?
但是第二遍做真题，因为有了第一遍对于文章内容的了解，你的重心就应该有所改变，重点应该放在后面的五道题目上来，认真分析每道题目类型，然后按照题目类型和题干关键词看看，不用像第一遍做题时看那么多句话，只找到一到两句精准的定位句子就把题目解出来。
做第三遍的时候，再站在一个更宏观的角度观察下，每道题目所涉及到的定位句子在每个段落里面的什么位置，有什么特点，比如位于段首、段尾、还是长难句?再看看，每篇文章的主旨句和每道题正确选项之间有什么联系?其实就是找找规律，摸索出点儿门道，比如揣摩下命题人一般把考点设置在哪个位置等等。只有这样一层层的剥洋葱似的看阅读真题，才能避免只见树木不见森林盲目式的阅读，才能快速提高阅读部分的成绩。

2. 考研英语阅读理解80篇是不是比真题难度大些

您好，我觉得难易因人而异。加油迎向158教育在线知道提问

3. 考研英语阅读理解一般平均几分钟一篇啊

考研英语一共3个小时，阅读4篇单选的那种，平均一篇18-20分钟左右。 不过阅读占分比挺高的，可以把其他的做快点，阅读多留点时间。
希望对你有帮助

4. 考研英语#阅读理解有多变态

关于考研英语你首先需要了解的是考研英语分为英语一和英语二，英语一的阅读理内解确实很变态，不过英语二的阅容读理解还是容易很多，算不上变态。英语一的阅读理解大多数人刚开始刷的时候都是看自己对了几个，因为几乎就只会对几个。而英语本身不好的有可能在阅读中全军覆没，不过也不用太着急，通过准备练习，后期还是都会有所提升的，只要肯花时间。

对于考研英语，经过大部分人总结的经验就是刷真题，一遍一遍的刷，把真题中的每个生词，每个长难句都搞懂，你就不会觉得阅读理解变态了。不过刚开始可能会觉得有点费时，但是一定要坚持，因为这是最有效的方法。

5. 考研英语阅读理解答题技巧。

第一步：快速划出段落序号以及各段首句。
第二步：阅读首段，了解文章主题（Theme）。
宏观把握，随机应变，根据第一段内容，才能更好的给定位打下基础。
第三步：扫描题干，尽量找出题干能够提供的信息（Key Words）1分钟
定位词的优先考虑顺序:
1、首先标出明确告诉位置的题目所在（某段某行）。
2、专有名词优先，包括人名、地名、书名以及带引号的词等 。
3、数字、时间、时段（包括某些介词短语）。
4、较长、较复杂的词组（名词动词词组优先） 。
5、重要的动词、形容词或副词等实词 。
6、条件词、因果词、比较词等虚词（往往起到辅助作用） 。
第四步：变速浏览原文，抓住中心。
注意把握三个阅读原则：
原则一：首段原则（文章的第一段逐字读明白，可以反复和回读）。
原则二：首末句原则（其余各段的首尾句要细读，其他各句正常阅读即可）。
原则三：“路标”原则。所谓路标词，就是表示作者思想衔接和转折的功能词汇。
第五步：仔细审题，定位原文。
原则一：关键词定位原则 。
原则二：自然段定位原则 。
原则三：长难句定位原则。
注意一：关键词在原文可能是原词本身，也可能是关键词的同义词。
注意二：问原因的问题，一般问主要原因（major reason）。
注意三：“邪恶的眼睛”（in the eyes of），注意问的是谁的观点和态度。

6. 考研英语真题：阅读理解

考研英语真题：阅读理解

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK "town of culture" award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in E220m of investment and an avalache of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain' town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for, the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow- village of culture ? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?

It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run "year of culture" washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community . The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organizations. But it can be done : Glasgow' s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A "town of culture" could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town's

peculiarities-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

21. Cooper and her colleagues argue that a "town of culture" award could________

[A] consolidate the town-city ties in Britain.

[B] promote cooperation among Britain's towns.

[C] increase the economic strength of Britain's towns.

[D] focus Britain's limited resources on cultural events.

22. According to Paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as________

[A] a sensible compromise.

[B] a self-deceiving attempt.

[C] an eye-catching bonus.

[D] an inaccessible target.

23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it________

[A] endeavours to maintain its image.

[B] meets the aspirations of its people.

[C] brings its local arts to prominence.

D] commits to its long-term growth.

24. Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present________

[A] a contrasting case.

[B] a supporting example.

[C] a background story,

[D] a related topic.

25. What is the author's attitude towards the proposal ?

[A] Skeptical

[B] Objective

[C] Favourable

[D] Critical

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money. Scientists need joumals in which to publish

their research, so they will supply the articles without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free, because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the proction of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only fnd a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very price sensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing instry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier, which claims to publish 25% of the scientific papers proced in the world,made profits of more than £900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than £210m in 2016 toenable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012, which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accessed, shows the legal ecosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms: either freely available from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities. Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their proct free to readers by charging their writers fees to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around ￡500 to $5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these’’article preparation costs’’ had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation. In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status, while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places. In both cases, we need a rebalancing of power.

26. Scientific publishing is seen as“a licence to print money" partly because________

[A] its funding has enjoyed a steady increase .

[B] its marketing strategy has been successful.

[C] its payment for peer review is reced.

[D] its content acquisition costs nothing.

27. According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have________

[A] thrived mainly on university libraries.

[B] gone through an existential crisis.

[C] revived the publishing instry.

[D] financed researchers generously.

28. How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

[A] Relieved.

[B] Puzzled.

[C] Concerned

[D] Encouraged.

29. It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms________

[A]allow publishers some room to make money.

[B] render publishing much easier for scientists.

[C] rece the cost of publication substantially.

[D] free universities from financial burdens.

30. Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

[A] Trial subscription is offered.

[B] Labour triumphs over status.

[C] Costs are well controlled.

D] The few feed on the many.

Text 3

Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.

A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.

Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________

[A] help little to rece gender bias.

[B] pose a threat to the state government.

[C] raise women's position in politics.

[D] greatly broaden career options.

32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?

[A] It has irritated private business owners.

[B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,

[C] It may go against the Constitution.

[D] It will settle the prior controversies.

33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____

[A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.

[B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.

[C] the pressure on women in global corporations.

[D] the needlessness of government interventions.

34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____

[A] the underestimation of elite women's role.

[B] the objection to female participation on boards.

[C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.

[D] the growing tension between labor and management.

35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

[A] Women's need in employment should be considered.

[B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.

[C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.

[D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax

on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France. Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such servces. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a“GAFA tax," meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multiational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measure, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital services tax is part of a much larger trend, with countries over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britain's DPT (diverted profits tax), Australia's MAAL (multinational antiavoidance law), and India's SEP (significant economic presence) test, to name but a few. At the same time, the European Union, Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated digital services taxes.

These unilateral developments differ in their specifics, but they are all designed to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep ;up with the current economy.

In response to these many unilateral measures, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currently working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020 on an international solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization' s work, but France's digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system.

France‘s planned tax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companies will face a cascade of different taxes from dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

36. The French Senate has passed a bill to_____

[A] regulate digital services platforms.

[B] protect French companies' interests .

[C] impose a levy on tech multinationals.

[D] curb the influence of advertising.

37. It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax _____

[A] may trigger countermeasures against France.

[B] is apt to arouse criticism at home and abroad.

[C] aims to ease international trade tensions.

[D] will prompt the tech giants to quit France.

38. The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that _____

[A] redistribution of tech giants' revenue must be ensured.

[B] the current international tax system needs upgrading.

[C] tech multinationals' monopoly should be prevented.

[D] all countries ought to enjoy equal taxing rights.

39. It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO's current work_____

[A] is being resisted by US companies.

[B] needs to be readjusted immediately.

[C] is faced with uncertain prospects.

[D] needs to in involve more countries.

40. Which of the following might be the. best title for this text?

[A] France Is Confronted with Trade Sanctions

[B] France leads the charge on Digital Tax

[C] France Says "NO" to Tech Multinationals

[D] France Demands a Role in the Digital Economy

考研英语真题：阅读理解的内容小编就说到这里了，更多关于考研备考技巧，报名入口，报名时间，考研成绩查询，报名费用，准考证打印入口及时间等问题，小编会及时更新。希望各位考生都能进入自己的理想考研院校。希望大家能好好复习。取得佳绩。

7. 怎么提高考研英语阅读理解正确率

语课作为一门非常重要的基础课，从着手开始准备考研到正式考前一个半月的这段准备时间里，应重点复习，投入的时间要占平时复习时间的三分之一。英语的提高是个日积月累，厚积薄发的过程，也是逆水行舟、不进则退的过程。你可以花一个月时间突击政治。但绝不敢自恃英语基础不错，放松英语的学习。提高英语成绩的捷径，我认为是多做阅读题：一是阅读理解的分值太高了，决定着考研的成败、考生的命运，无法不重视。二是阅读理解在巩固词汇，培养语感，提高英语水平方面有不可替代作用。那么究竟如何提高呢？建议如下：

一、资料的选择

首先，历年考试真题是必备的资料，真题是一个标准，做真题可以把握试题难度，出题角度，了解命题重点。其次，考研阅读辅导书，这种资料贵精不在多。另外，比较权威的考研机构有配合授课的课后练习，模拟冲刺，这种书也是不错的。

资料的选择上要把握难易程度。如果太难，文章中有很多单词不认识、有很多句子不理解、问题又偏又怪、做下来错的一塌糊涂，只会打击你的信心，浪费你的时间，也不会有很大收效。比英语真题简单也行不通，所以我建议大家选择比真题难度稍高的资料。研究生的阅读试题题材广泛，涉及到包括政治、经济、文化、科技、军事、科普，教育等在内的方方面面；所选体裁多样，包括记叙文、议论文、说明文、新闻文体等；文章内容时新，具有可读性，一般很少有考生读过的文章出现，所以选择的辅导书覆盖面要广，内容要跟得上时代变化。在你选择时，要考虑书籍的作者、出版社、书的质量，难易程度及参考他人对该书的评价。买书前，不妨借同学的书看一下或到书店详细阅读该书的介绍，做一两篇阅读把握难易程度，选项设置等。有些出版商只为牟利不负责任出书，书的内容东拼西凑，答案分析牵强附会或者干脆没有，甚至连答案都是错误的，这种书百害而无一利。

二、阅读能力的提高

阅读能力的测试包括阅读速度，理解程度以及记忆能力等。要想获得满意的考研英语成绩，最根本的方法就是提高词汇量，加强阅读训练，同时熟悉一些阅读技巧和做题方法也是至关重要的。每个人都有自己习惯的做题方法，不能说哪种方法更高明，要大家纷纷仿效。我比较赞同的一种方法是先快速浏览问题，然后带着问题通读全文，了解文章的大概内容，这一遍要快，不理解的地方跳过，然后做题。这时我们心中已大概知道答案的分布，跳过无关部分，快速找到答案所在处，仔细阅读，反复推敲，直到选出正确答案。可以用直接法和排除法相结合选择答案，排除法是四个选项都看，逐一排除选项，选出正确答案。这种方法可提高正确率，但花费的时间较长。

做阅读题，要避免以下几点：

第一，不忠于原文，主观选择答案。尤其对比较熟悉的题材或有个人习惯看法的问题往往容易以自己的主观看法代替作者的观点。阅读理解的各选项间干扰性很大，许多答案都有其合理的一面，但不是作者在文中要表达的观点，不是最确切的答案。所以我们必须仔细推敲，将原文的真正含义理解透彻，用原文要表达的意思对照四个选项，选出最切合原文句意的答案。如果对原文中心思想把握的不到位，跟着感觉走，想当然的选择答案，就会被错误选项蒙蔽。对某一题材的熟悉有助于理解文章的内容，但也会出现误导答案的选择。

第二，问题简单化，粗心以及一些不良的阅读习惯。研究生的阅读题比六级要难一些，一般情况下文章的中心思想比较隐含，不会放在每段的第一句，答案不会在文章中直接给出。所以我们通过阅读，除了理解文章的字面意思外，更要对一些没有被文字表达出来的信息，通过作者的观点，自己已有的经验，知识做出合乎逻辑的推断。做题时要注意文章中的一些关键词，这些关键词在理解作者的态度和选择答案方面有非常重要的作用。这些关键词包括一些重要信息的转折词，如but,yet,although,however等，这可以让我们了解到作者要转换话题或否定已述内容。表示举例的有such as,for instanse。表示目的的有to this end ,for this purpose,with this object。另一些词如as a result,finally,in conclusion则表示作者对自己所述的事情要做一概括并准备结束所谈及的问题。一些同学做题注意力不集中，做题速度慢，还有做阅读题读出声，一字一字读，碰到不懂的单词查词典的习惯，这是很不好的。考研时间是非常紧的，要在有限时间内做完所有题就需要平时多锻炼。平时做题在保证正确率的前提下要注意提高阅读速度。阅读时碰到不认识的单词可以通过构词法，根据上下文意思或该词的同位语推测，不要经常查词典，做阅读题是培养语感，巩固词汇的过程，不是积累词汇的过程。做题查词典一是浪费时间，不利提高阅读能力，二这也不是背单词的好办法。由于阅读题材广泛，体裁多样，所以在平时的训练中要广泛阅读，尽可能地接触各种文章，不要受自己兴趣爱好影响，对那些自己平时不感兴趣或觉得较难的文章更应该多训练，为考试做准备。考研有很多句子偏长，修饰语多，分隔现象严重，词义隐晦令人费解。分隔现象增多破坏句子连贯性，修饰成分多则造成理解困难，降低阅读速度。这种长句平时也要多多锻炼的。可以先弄清句子的基本成分，再弄清句子中的各修饰成分在句中作用以及各成分间的相互关系，然后根据上下文理解句子意思。考试时是没有时间这样一二三去分析的，平时这样锻炼可培养习惯思维，考试时速度自然而然就快了

第三，做完题缺少检查。对感觉把握不大或较难的试题，尤其是概括归纳题，作者意图题等在做完后要根据全文和问题的答案，看是否有矛盾，是否符合逻辑。一些细节题，推测题，判断题要在文章相关段落中找到根据，以做到确保无误。在平时的训练中，要总结适合自己的方法，发现缺点及时纠正并在下次做题中避免发生类似错误。

足够数量的词汇和娴熟的语法知识是提高阅读理解能力和增强阅读速度的基础，阅读理解的技巧和方法有助于提高答案正确率及答题速度。这段时间要合理安排时间，掌握大量词汇，熟悉一些语法知识，培养语感。

8. 考研英语一篇阅读理解该做几分钟内

根据我们寝室考研狗和考研机构辅导老师总结的经验：

1. 无论是英语一还是英语二，都应该保持在17min以内.

2. 在做阅读时，应该先看题目再阅读，找到题目对应的句子，这样是效率最高的。

9. 最近做考研英语阅读理解题总是在一些小的细节题上扣分，愁死人不，哎……这种总是考查细节的阅读理解太坑

考研英语阅读理解细节题减少扣分的办法：
一、了解细节题的命题模式
题干中常见的提示词有：which，what，why，who，how，how many, cause,
because, result, true, not true, mention, not mention等。
二、清楚解题核心技巧
1、定位：根据题干的定位词回文定位，寻找线索句。题目顺序与文章顺序基本一致，视情况灵活处理。
常见的定位特征有以下几类：
①对研究行为进行描述：
study，research，survey，findings，grope，assumption，hypothesis
目的：aim，purpose，target，for，to
方法：way，means，approach，by，in
发现：discover，findings，show，found，analysis，cause，because，
application
②专有名词出现的地方：UN，Dr.
③年代、时间、数字
④特殊符号出现的地方：冒号，破折号，引号，分号，括号
⑤信号词出现的地方
转折：however，but，nevertheless，though，even though，on the
contrary，instead，important，above all，again，as well，especially
原因：because，attribute A to B，if，when
⑥特殊语法出现的地方：定语从句，同位语从句，分词做状语，虚拟语气
2、替换：将四个选项与线索句一一比对，表达方式不同意思最为接近的选项就是正确答案(必要时需要分析线索句的上一句和下一句;当线索句为段落首末句的时候，支持句为段落的其他句子)。
①用同义词替换原文句子中某些词语，一般不超过两个，大体语法不变
②变换语法但是不改变原意。如主动态变被动态，定语从句还原，省略副词等
③原文句子是否定形式，从反面叙述，而答案是正面形式，是肯定叙述
④原文从A角度叙述，答案从B角度叙述，本质不变
⑤原文是抽象概括，答案是具体案例
3、排除：排除干扰选项，再次确定正确选项。
①照抄原文，个别词不同，不同点往往就是错误
②一半符合原文，一半不符合原文
③张冠李戴，混合信息
④与原文叙述相反(肯定变否定，否定变肯定)
⑤是原文中没有出现的新信息
⑥.绝对化的表述
⑦在转述中犯逻辑错误
阅读是考研英语的半壁江山，而细节题又是阅读的半壁江山，足见其重要性。对于2016考研冲刺的学生来说，把细节题攻克就是通关最重要的一举。希望上面分享的方法对你有用，祝大家考研英语成功通关!