03年考研英语一阅读text4

❶ 2006年考研英语text4解析

你把句子贴上来啊

❷ 求助 关于考研英语一真题2013年text4

Text 4
a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona's immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Aministration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the federal government and the states.
An arizona.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona's controversial plan to have state and local police enfour federal immigrations law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Anturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state police that ran to the existing federal ones.
Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun .On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately "occupied the field " and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal's privileged powers
However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.
Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.
The 8-0 objection to President Obama tures on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”. The White House argued tha Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.
Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn't want to carry out Congress's immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
36. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they
[A] deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.
[B] disturbed the power balance between different states.
[C] overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.
[D] contradicted both the federal and state policies.
37. On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?
[A] Federal officers’ ty to withhold immigrants’information.
[B] States’ independence from federal immigration law.
[C] States’ legitimate role in immigration enforcement.
[D] Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement.
38. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts
[A] violated the Constitution.
[B] undermined the states’ interests.
[C] supported the federal statute.
[D] stood in favor of the states.
39. The White House claims that its power of enforcement
[A] outweighs that held by the states.
[B] is dependent on the states’ support.
[C] is established by federal statutes.
[D] rarely goes against state laws.
40. What can be learned from the last paragraph?
[A] Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.
[B] Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.
[C] Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.
[D] The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.

❸ 考研英语阅读，2007年，text4，图里面第一句的mystery怎么翻译come怎么解释整句

mystery字面翻译是谜，神秘的，这里可以理解为难以置信的是、令人吃惊的是，come as surprise固定搭配版，指令人意权外的，大吃一惊的。整句话可以说是：不可思议的是（难以置信的是）这（this做主语）竟让很多BOSS大吃一惊

❹ 考研英语阅读，2007年，text4，Left什么意思seen as a concern onl

这里的left应该是leave的过去分词，until now只是插进来的，left to才是应该连在一起的，left to odd, low-level IT staff to put right, 所以这里的left to你应版该知道权是什么意思了。
这里的seen也是see的过去分词，而see是看的意思，所以根据文中意思，这里翻译成"被关注"比较贴切，所以这里断句应该是seen/as a concern/only of data-rich instries/such as banking.
所以整个句子的意思大概是：以前这些信息的保密工作一直都是留给(注意：这里的"留给"就是left to)一些没什么水准的员工去处理，而且只被一些涉及大量数据的行业，像银行啊电信啊航空行业这些所关注(它的保密工作←这是我自己加的，便于你理解)。

❺ 2013年英语一阅读text4是不是太难了点儿

2013年英复语一阅读text4确实是非常难制了。

每年考试过后8月份或9月份公布成绩并颁发成绩单，根据教育部规定四六级考试不设置及格线，四级425分（含425分）以上可以报考六级，所以大家普遍认为四六级的合格线为425分。

英语四六级的分数是排位分，没有总分。报名时间CET全国英语四六级考试的考试时间为：每年6月份、12月份（每年时间略有不同）。

2019年1月15日，中国教育部考试中心与英国文化教育协会在京联合发布雅思、普思考试与中国英语能力等级量表对接研究结果。雅思听力得5分，即达到中国英语能力等级量表四级水平。

❻ 考研英语真题2006 Text 4五问

一、第一句为强调句，楼主弄错了。

二、第二句里面what our economy depends on us forgetting在破折号里面做我们所遗忘的what we forget的补充说明专。

三、属这是一个省略句，大概的意思是说，到处都是这样的人。作者用这个手法来表示他的讽刺与不满，中文中常有没有语法的东东，楼主不必可以强调这个，知道意思就行。

四、个人认为应该是翻译二，因为文章开始的时候就说了艺术家比较怪异的感情倾向，因此这里应该是指代的负面感情。

五、are those/best suited for expressing joy
谓 宾 宾语补足语（其实是省略了that的从句）

再说明一下，楼主这样读文章，考研必败！因为你研究的没有一个是长难句，也并不都是出题点，更没有很多难词汇，熟词僻义的，因此根本就没有什么研究价值。力气要花在要点上。
而且就我看来，楼主英语基础并不太好，这样复习根本就不适合，还不如多看看阅读的方法什么的，这样对于你做好题目，得好分数是有帮助。真的有研究英语的毅力可以等到考完了再慢慢来。

❼ 考研英语阅读，2006，text4，这句话咋翻译

但从19世纪的某个时候起

❽ 2002考研英语text4 第四段 无法理解

我是11年才参加过考研的，由于今年题比较简单，分数还可以，82分
我做这篇阅读的时候，也比较费解，不知道你是不是也是看的张剑的那本，所以当你提到这个的时候，我印象很深刻
先谈你所说的问题吧，我当时对shield的理解是保护，使之免受。。。。的困惑，不知道你注意到没有，Nancy所说的那句话，虽然是通过” “直接引用的，但是用的是完成时，而不是习惯上的untill now are still very,very strongly insisting that 。。。。。所以，我觉得，如果翻译成：
Nancy认为：这一原则将使那些医生消除疑虑，在此之前，他们一直强烈地认为，如果给病人充分的药品来止痛会加速他们的死亡的话，那就不能这样做，（因为可能要承担法律责任）。

而上文中，提到了最高法开始认可这一存在了几个世纪的原则，并且医生们也在近年开始利用这一原则为自己滥用药品开脱。这样，上下文，就能比较好的衔接上了。并且，我看到过一本新东方的翻译，意思也与这个差多。

其次，我再废话几句吧，考研的英语，主要就是阅读，而阅读，又以单词和思路最为重要，你单词如果过关，再加上能这样仔细的分析。相信坚持下去，会取得非常好的成绩。现在，我个人觉得啊，你着重应该研究的是05-11的阅读的，之前的，稍有一点简单和过时。现在的阅读，像你提到的这种，光凭单词直译，很难理解完全的情况越来越多。

最后，祝你成功！

❾ 考研英语阅读，2007年，text4，Left什么意思seen as a concern onl

这里的left应该是leave的过来去分词，源until
now只是插进来的，left
to才是应该连在一起的，left
to
odd,
low-level
IT
staff
to
put
right,
所以这里的left
to你应该知道是什么意思了。
这里的seen也是see的过去分词，而see是看的意思，所以根据文中意思，这里翻译成"被关注"比较贴切，所以这里断句应该是seen/as
a
concern/only
of
data-rich
instries/such
as
banking.
所以整个句子的意思大概是：以前这些信息的保密工作一直都是留给(注意：这里的"留给"就是left
to)一些没什么水准的员工去处理，而且只被一些涉及大量数据的行业，像银行啊电信啊航空行业这些所关注(它的保密工作←这是我自己加的，便于你理解)。

❿ 考研英语阅读，2011年text4，第二句太难了，给点语法分析，不要翻译

〔to……Aniston〕是主语，因为主语太长，所以采用形式主语〔it
〕