导航:首页 > 英语阅读 > 考研英语一2010阅读理解

考研英语一2010阅读理解

发布时间:2020-12-29 21:48:09

❶ 考研英语一有多少篇阅读理解

您好,总共180分钟4篇阅读理解 每篇5个选择 每个选择2分
------------------天津VIP考研为您解答

❷ 2010考研英语第一篇阅读题目是什么

Text 1
Of all the changes that have taken place in English-language newspapers ring the past quarter-century, perhaps the most far-reaching has been the inexorable decline in the scope and seriousness of their arts coverage.(T1)

It is difficult to the point of impossibility for the average reader under the age of forty to imagine a time when high-quality arts criticism could be found in most bit-city newspapers. Yet a considerable number of the most significant collections of criticism published in the 20th century consisted in large part of newspaper reviews. To read such books today is to marvel at the fact that their learned contents were once deemed suitable for publication in general-circulation dailies.

We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews published in England between the turn of the 20th century and the eve of World War 2,at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared. In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered. Theirs was a serious business. and even those reviews who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were a out. These men believed in journalism as a calling , and were proud to be published in the daily press. 'So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism,' Newman wrote, "that I am tempted to define "journalism" as "a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are".'

Unfortunately, these critics are virtually forgotten. Neville Cars, who wrote for the Manchester Guardian from 1917 until shortly before his death in 1975, is now known solely as a writer of essays on the game of cricket. During his lifetime, though, he was also one of England's foremost classical-music critics, and a stylist so widely admired that his Autobiography (1947) became a best-seller. He was knighted in 1967,the first music critic to be so honored. Yet only one of his books is now in print, and his vast body of writings on music is unknown save to specialists.

Is there any chance that Cars's criticism will enjoy a revival? The prospect seems remote. Journalistic tastes had changed long before his death, and postmodern readers have little use for the richly uphostered Vicwardian prose in which he specialized. Moreover, the amateur tradition in music criticism has been in headlong retreat.

21. It is indicated in Paragraphs 1 and 2 that
A arts criticism has disappeared from big-city newspapers.
B English-language newspapers used to carry more arts reviews.
C high-quality newspapers retain a large body of readers.
D young readers doubt the suitability of criticism on dailies.
22. Newspaper reviews in England before World War 2 were characterized by
A free themes.
B casual style.
C elaborate layout.
D radical viewpoints.
23. Which of the following would shaw and Newman most probably agree on?
A It is writers' ty to fulfill journalistic goals.
B It is contemptible for writers to be journalists.
C Writers are likely to be tempted into journalism.
D Not all writers are capable of journalistic writing.
24. What can be learned about Cars according to the last two paragraphs?
A His music criticism may not appeal to readers today.
B His reputation as a music critic has long been in dispute.
C His style caters largely to modern specialists.
D His writings fail to follow the amateur tradition.
25. What would be the best title for the text?
A Newspapers of the Good Old Days
B The Lost Horizon in Newspapers
C Mournful Decline of Journalism
D Prominent Critics in Memory

新东方版

❸ 张剑的《2010考研英语第一时间—英语阅读理解精练100篇》大家有用过的么

我买的就是那本,是张剑和王轶群编的,星火出的,差的很,文章没头没尾,可回能是王轶群编的,答张剑只是挂个名而已,看了有三十篇,感觉真的挺差,王轶群的评价是“考研没有王轶群,考研复习不完整”,感觉真是厚脸皮,编的是很垃圾,不如买张剑的《150篇》,或者黄宝书吧 个人建议!仅供参考! 查看原帖>>

❹ 考研英语真题:阅读理解

考研英语真题:阅读理解


Text 1


A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK "town of culture" award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in E220m of investment and an avalache of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain' town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.


Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for, the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow- village of culture ? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?


It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run "year of culture" washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community . The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.


It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organizations. But it can be done : Glasgow' s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.


A "town of culture" could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town's


peculiarities-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.


21. Cooper and her colleagues argue that a "town of culture" award could________


[A] consolidate the town-city ties in Britain.


[B] promote cooperation among Britain's towns.


[C] increase the economic strength of Britain's towns.


[D] focus Britain's limited resources on cultural events.


22. According to Paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as________


[A] a sensible compromise.


[B] a self-deceiving attempt.


[C] an eye-catching bonus.


[D] an inaccessible target.


23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it________


[A] endeavours to maintain its image.


[B] meets the aspirations of its people.


[C] brings its local arts to prominence.


D] commits to its long-term growth.


24. Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present________


[A] a contrasting case.


[B] a supporting example.


[C] a background story,


[D] a related topic.


25. What is the author's attitude towards the proposal ?


[A] Skeptical


[B] Objective


[C] Favourable


[D] Critical


Text 2


Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money. Scientists need joumals in which to publish


their research, so they will supply the articles without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free, because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the proction of scientific knowledge.


With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only fnd a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very price sensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing instry is in an existential crisis.


The Dutch giant Elsevier, which claims to publish 25% of the scientific papers proced in the world,made profits of more than £900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than £210m in 2016 toenable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.


The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012, which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accessed, shows the legal ecosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.


In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms: either freely available from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.


Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities. Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their proct free to readers by charging their writers fees to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around £500 to $5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these’’article preparation costs’’ had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation. In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status, while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places. In both cases, we need a rebalancing of power.


26. Scientific publishing is seen as“a licence to print money" partly because________


[A] its funding has enjoyed a steady increase .


[B] its marketing strategy has been successful.


[C] its payment for peer review is reced.


[D] its content acquisition costs nothing.


27. According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have________


[A] thrived mainly on university libraries.


[B] gone through an existential crisis.


[C] revived the publishing instry.


[D] financed researchers generously.


28. How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?


[A] Relieved.


[B] Puzzled.


[C] Concerned


[D] Encouraged.


29. It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms________


[A]allow publishers some room to make money.


[B] render publishing much easier for scientists.


[C] rece the cost of publication substantially.


[D] free universities from financial burdens.


30. Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?


[A] Trial subscription is offered.


[B] Labour triumphs over status.


[C] Costs are well controlled.


D] The few feed on the many.


Text 3


Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.


A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.


Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.


The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.


The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".


But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?


The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.


Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.


Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.


Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.


31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________


[A] help little to rece gender bias.


[B] pose a threat to the state government.


[C] raise women's position in politics.


[D] greatly broaden career options.


32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?


[A] It has irritated private business owners.


[B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,


[C] It may go against the Constitution.


[D] It will settle the prior controversies.


33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____


[A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.


[B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.


[C] the pressure on women in global corporations.


[D] the needlessness of government interventions.


34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____


[A] the underestimation of elite women's role.


[B] the objection to female participation on boards.


[C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.


[D] the growing tension between labor and management.


35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?


[A] Women's need in employment should be considered.


[B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.


[C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.


[D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.


Text 4


Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax


on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France. Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such servces. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a“GAFA tax," meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multiational tech companies based in the United States.


The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measure, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.


The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital services tax is part of a much larger trend, with countries over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britain's DPT (diverted profits tax), Australia's MAAL (multinational antiavoidance law), and India's SEP (significant economic presence) test, to name but a few. At the same time, the European Union, Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated digital services taxes.


These unilateral developments differ in their specifics, but they are all designed to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep ;up with the current economy.


In response to these many unilateral measures, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currently working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020 on an international solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization' s work, but France's digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system.


France‘s planned tax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companies will face a cascade of different taxes from dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.


36. The French Senate has passed a bill to_____


[A] regulate digital services platforms.


[B] protect French companies' interests .


[C] impose a levy on tech multinationals.


[D] curb the influence of advertising.


37. It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax _____


[A] may trigger countermeasures against France.


[B] is apt to arouse criticism at home and abroad.


[C] aims to ease international trade tensions.


[D] will prompt the tech giants to quit France.


38. The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that _____


[A] redistribution of tech giants' revenue must be ensured.


[B] the current international tax system needs upgrading.


[C] tech multinationals' monopoly should be prevented.


[D] all countries ought to enjoy equal taxing rights.


39. It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO's current work_____


[A] is being resisted by US companies.


[B] needs to be readjusted immediately.


[C] is faced with uncertain prospects.


[D] needs to in involve more countries.


40. Which of the following might be the. best title for this text?


[A] France Is Confronted with Trade Sanctions


[B] France leads the charge on Digital Tax


[C] France Says "NO" to Tech Multinationals


[D] France Demands a Role in the Digital Economy


考研英语真题:阅读理解的内容小编就说到这里了,更多关于考研备考技巧,报名入口,报名时间,考研成绩查询,报名费用,准考证打印入口及时间等问题,小编会及时更新。希望各位考生都能进入自己的理想考研院校。希望大家能好好复习。取得佳绩。

❺ 谁知道2010考研英语真题第一篇阅读

考过就忘了一干二净的。。。个人觉得第二个难。

❻ 1998年考研英语一第三篇阅读理解。

楼主现在应该已经很清楚了 但是还是说一下嘿嘿 楼主只截取这一句话是很难判专断的 但是这句话句首有一个属BUT 也就是说内容跟前面相反 后面接着说这并不意味着环保主义者是反科学的 说明前面应该是在说什么什么是反科学的,最后又说但是去年5月发表的us news 却似乎是这样暗示的 连起来就是这句话之前说的是应该是有关反科学的 作者又表明态度说环保主义者不在此列 后面又说这个杂志却似乎是这样暗示的 显而易见就是在暗讽这个杂志胡说八道 所以杂志应该认为环保主义者是反科学的 不知道这样说是不是清楚 如果有什么错误就是我水平低哈哈

❼ 2010考研英语阅读理解精读100篇(高分版)会不会太难了点

阅读还行,就是后面解析的错误太多,解析说a答案说b的之类的很多,才做24分
及格分的水平
等我做到30分以上的时候
就去做真题,没做真题不知啥个难度,

阅读全文

与考研英语一2010阅读理解相关的资料

热点内容
老公的家教老师女演员 浏览:788
圆明园题材电影有哪些 浏览:806
欧洲出轨类型的电影 浏览:587
看电影可以提前在网上买票么 浏览:288
有没有什么可以在b站看的电影 浏览:280
今晚他要去看电影吗?翻译英文。 浏览:951
林默烧衣服的那个电影叫什么 浏览:133
哈莉奎茵与小丑电影免费观看 浏览:509
维卡克里克斯演过哪些电影 浏览:961
什么算一下观看的网站 浏览:710
大地影院今日上映表 浏览:296
朱罗纪世界1免费观看 浏览:311
影院容纳量 浏览:746
韩国最大尺度电影 浏览:130
八百电影 浏览:844
手机影院排行榜在哪看 浏览:182
韩国有真做的电影么 浏览:237
欧美爱情电影网 浏览:515
一个女的去美国的电影 浏览:9
金希贞的妻子的朋友 浏览:610