医学博士英语2005年阅读

Ⅰ 医学考博英语

由于考博英语试题由各招生单位自己独立命题，所以不同院校的考博英语试题题型风格不尽相同。就题型而言，一般都含有词汇结构、完形填空、阅读理解、汉英互译、作文题。

想要快速掌握考博英语试题，这家欧美外教课程，免费试听课程地址：【https://www.acadsoc.com】

考博英语重视考查翻译、写作等与攻读博士学位相关的应用能力，所以其难度不能简单与其他考试比较。但一般来说，考博英语试题的难度约相当于大学英语六级，少数院校比六级难，有些院校甚至只相当于四级水平，甚至同一院校不同年份的难易程度也迥异。

面向医学博士英语考试应试人员复习备考的痛点和难点，阿西吧机构外教老师对医学博士英语考试，特别是听力部分的复习备考，有深刻的分析和独到的见解。本书为医学博士英语备考提供系统的策略指导，帮助学员优化复习方法，提高学习效率；同时又通过真题分析和模拟练习，提升学员应试水平。

还有其他什么学习问题，可以网络搜“阿西吧vivi老师”为您分析解答。

想要更多的英语学习资源，可以网络搜“阿西吧官网论坛”免费下载。

Ⅱ 05年硕士研究生入学考试英语阅读理解试题译文

Everybody loves a fat pay rise. Yet pleasure at your own can vanish if you learn that a colleague has been given a bigger one. Indeed, if he has a reputation for slacking, you might even be outraged. Such behaviour is regarded as “all too human”, with the underlying assumption that other animals would not be capable of this finely developed sense of grievance. But a study by Sarah Brosnan and Frans de Waal of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has just been published in Nature, suggests that it all too monkey, as well.
The researchers studied the behaviour of female brown capuchin monkeys. They look cute. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food tardily. Above all, like their female human counterparts, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of “goods and services” than males.
Such characteristics make them perfect candidates for Dr. Brosnan's and Dr. de waal's; study. The researchers spent two years teaching their monkeys to exchange tokens for food. Normally, the monkeys were happy enough to exchange pieces of rock for slices of cucumber. However, when two monkeys were placed in separate but adjoining chambers, so that each could observe what the other was getting in return for its rock, their behaviour became markedly different.
In the world of capuchins grapes are luxury goods (and much preferable to cucumbers) So when one monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her token, the second was reluctant to hand hers over for a mere piece of cucumber. And if one received a grape without having to provide her token in exchange at all, the other either tossed her own token at the researcher or out of the chamber, or refused to accept the slice of cucumber . Indeed, the mere presence of a grape in the other chamber (without an actual monkey to eat it) was enough to rece resentment in a female capuchin.
The researches suggest that capuchin monkeys, like humans, are guided by social emotions, in the wild, they are a co-operative, groupliving species, Such co-operation is likely to be stable only when each animal feels it is not being cheated. Feelings of righteous indignation, it seems, are not the preserve of people alone, Refusing a lesser reward completely makes these feelings abundantly clear to other members of the group. However, whether such a sense of fairness evolved independently in capuchins and humans, or whether it stems form the common ancestor that the species had 35 million years ago, is, as yet, an unanswered question.
人人都喜欢大幅加薪，但是当你知道一个同事薪水加得比你还要多的时候，那么加薪带给你的喜悦感就消失的无影无踪了。如果他还以懒散出名的话，你甚至会变得怒不可遏。这种行为被看作是“人之长情”，其潜在的假定其他动物不可能具有如此高度发达的不公平意识。但是由佐治亚州亚特兰大埃里莫大学的Sarah Brosnan 和Frans de Waal进行的一项研究表明，它也是“猴之常情”。这项研究成果刚刚发表在《自然》杂志上。
研究者们对雌性棕色卷尾猴的行为进行了研究。它们看起来很可爱，性格温顺，合作，乐于分享食物。最重要的是，就象女人们一样，它们往往比雄性更关注“商品和服务”价值。这些特性使它们成为Brosnan 和 de Waal理想的研究对象。研究者们花了两年的时间教这些猴子用代币换取食物。正常情况下，猴子很愿意用几块石头换几片黄瓜。但是，当两个猴子被安置在隔开但相邻的两个房间里，能够互相看见对方用石头换回来什么东西时，猴子的行为就会变的明显不同。
在卷尾猴的世界里，葡萄是奢侈品（比黄瓜受欢迎得多）。所以当一只猴子用一个代币换回一颗葡萄时，第二只猴子就不愿意用自己的代币换回一片黄瓜。如果一只猴子根本无需用代币就能够得到一颗葡萄的话，那么另外一只就会将代币掷向研究人员或者扔出房间外，或者拒绝接受那片黄瓜。事实上，只要在另一房间里出现了葡萄（不管有没有猴子吃它），都足以引起雌卷尾猴的怨恨。
研究人员指出，正如人类一样，卷尾猴也受社会情感的影响。在野外，它们是相互合作的群居动物。只有当每只猴子感到自己没有受到欺骗时，这种合作才可能稳定。不公平而引起的愤怒感似乎不是人类的专利。拒绝接受较少的酬劳可以让这些情绪准确无误地传达给其它成员。但是这种公平感是在卷尾猴和人类身上各自独立演化而成，还是来自三千五百万前他们共同的祖先，这还是一个悬而未决的问题。
Do you remember all those years when scientists argued that smoking would kill us but the doubters insisted that we didn't know for sure? That the evidence was inconclusive, the science uncertain? That the antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life and the government should stay out of the way? Lots of Americans bought that nonsense, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early graves.
There are upsetting parallels today, as scientists in one wave after another try to awaken us to the growing threat of global warming. The latest was a panel from the National Academy of Sciences, enlisted by the White House, to tell us that the Earth's atmosphere is definitely warming and that the problem is largely man-made. The clear message is that we should get moving to protect ourselves. The president of the National Academy, Bruce Alberts, added this key point in the preface to the panel's report “Science never has all the answers .But science does provide us with the best available guide to the future, and it is critical that out nation and the world base important policies on the best judgments that science can provide concerning the future consequences of present actions.”
Just as on smoking, voices now come from many quarters insisting that the science about global warming is incomplete, that it's Ok to keep pouring fumes into the air until we know for sure. This is a dangerous game: by the 100 percent of the evidence is in, it may be too late. With the risks obvious and growing, a prudent people would take out an insurance policy now.
Fortunately, the White House is starting to pay attention. But it's obvious that a majority of the president's advisers still don't take global warming seriously. Instead of a plan of action, they continue to press for more research-a classic case of “paralysis by analysis”.
To serve as responsible stewards of the planet, we must press forward on deeper atmospheric and oceanic research But research alone is inadequate. If the Administration won't take the legislative initiative, Congress should help to begin fashioning conservation measures .A bill by Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, which would offer financial incentives for private instry is a promising start Many see that the country is getting ready to build lots of new power plants to meet our energy needs. If we are ever going to protect the atmosphere, it is crucial that those new plants be environmentally sound.
还记得科学家们认为吸烟会致人死亡，而那些怀疑者们却坚持认为我们无法对此得出定论的时候吗？还记得怀疑者们坚持认为缺乏决定性的证据，科学也不确定的时候吗？还记得怀疑者们坚持认为反对吸烟的游说是为了毁掉我们的生活方式，而政府应该置身事外的时候吗？许多美国人相信了这些胡言乱语，在三十多年中，差不多有一千万烟民早早的进了坟墓。
现在出现了与吸烟类似的令人感到难过的事情。科学家们前仆后继，试图使我们意识到全球气候变暖所带来的日益严重的威胁。最近的行动是由白宫召集了一批来自国家科学院的专家团，他们告诉我们，地球气候毫无疑问正在变暖，而这个问题主要是人为造成的。明确的信息表明是我们应该立刻着手保护自己。国家科学院院长Bruce Alberts在专家团报告的前言中加上了这一重要观点：“科学解答不了所有问题。但是科学确实为我们的未来提供了最好的指导，关键是我们的国家和整个的世界在做重要决策时，应该以科学能够提供的关于人类现在的行为对未来影响最好的判断作为依据。
就象吸烟问题一样，来自不同领域的声音坚持认为有关全球变暖的科学资料还不完整。在我们证实这件事之前可以向大气中不断的排放气体。这是一个危险的游戏；到了有百分之百的证据的时候，可能就太晚了。随着风险越来越明显，并且不断增加，一个谨慎的民族现在应该准备一份保单了。
幸运的是，白宫开始关注这件事了。但是显然大多数总统顾问并没有认真看待全球气候变暖这个问题。他们没有出台行动计划，相反只是继续迫切要求进行更多的研究――这是一个经典的“分析导致麻痹案例”。
为了成为地球上有责任心的一员，我们必须积极推进对于大气和海洋的深入研究。但只有研究是不够的。如果政府不争取立法上的主动权，国会就应该帮助政府开始采取保护措施。弗吉尼亚的民主党议员Robert Byrd提出一项议案，从经济上激励私企，就是一个良好的开端。许多人看到这个国家正准备修建许多新的发电厂，以满足我们的能源需求。如果我们准备保护大气，关键要让这些新发电厂对环境无害。
Of all the components of a good night's sleep, dreams seem to be least within our control. In dreams, a window opens into a world where logic is suspended and dead people speak. A century ago, Freud formulated his revolutionary theory that dreams were the disguised shadows of our unconscious desires and rears, by the late 1970s. neurologists had switched to thinking of them as just “mental noise” the random byprocts of the neural-repair work that goes on ring sleep. Now researchers suspect that dreams are part of the mind's emotional thermostat, regulating moods while the brain is “off-line”. And one leading authority says that these intensely powerful mental events can be not only harnessed but actually brought under conscious control, to help us sleep and feel better. “It's your dream” says Rosalind Cartwright, chair of psychology at Chicago's Medical Center. “If you don't like it , change it.”
Evidence from brain imaging supports this view. The brain is as active ring REM (rapid eye movement) sleep-when most vivid dreams occur-as it is when fully awake, says Dr, Eric Nofzinger at the University of Pittsburgh. But not all parts of the brain are equally involved, the limbic system (the “emotional brain”)is especially active, while the prefrontal cortex (the center of intellect and reasoning) is relatively quiet. “We wake up from dreams happy of depressed, and those feelings can stay with us all day” says Stanford sleep researcher Dr, William Dement.
The link between dreams and emotions shows up among the patients in Cartwright’s clinic. Most people seem to have more bad dreams early in the night, progressing toward happier ones before awakening, suggesting that they are working through negative feelings generated ring the day. Because our conscious mind is occupied with daily life we don’t always think about the emotional significance of the day’s events-until, it appears, we begin to dream.
And this process need not be left to the unconscious. Cartwright believes one can exercise conscious control over recurring bad dreams As soon as you awaken, identify what is upsetting about the dream. Visualize how you would like it to end instead, the next time is occurs, try to wake up just enough to control its course. With much practice people can learn to, literally, do it in their sleep.
At the end of the day, there's probably little reason to pay attention to our dreams at all unless they keep us from sleeping of “we wake u in a panic,” Cartwright says. Terrorism, economic uncertainties and general feelings of insecurity have increased people's anxiety. Those suffering from persistent nightmares should seek help from a therapist For the rest of us, the brain has its ways of working through bad feelings. Sleep-or rather dream-on it and you'll feel better in the morning.
在高质量睡眠的所有因素中，梦似乎是最无法控制的一个。在梦中，窗户通向的世界里，逻辑暂时失去了效用，死人开口说话。一个世纪前，弗洛伊德阐述了革命性的理论，即梦是人们潜意识中欲望和恐惧经伪装后的预示；到了20世纪70年代末期，神经病学家们转而认为梦是“精神噪音”，即睡眠时进行的神经修复活动的一种杂乱的副产品。目前，研究人员猜想梦是大脑情感自动调节系统的组成部分，当大脑处于“掉线”状态时对情绪进行规整。一名主要的权威人士说，梦这种异常强烈的精神活动不仅能被驾驭，事实上还可以有意识地加以控制，以帮助我们更好地睡眠和感觉。芝加哥医疗中心心里学系主任 Rosalind Cartwright说“梦是你自己的，如果你不喜欢，就改变它。”
大脑造影的证据支持了以上观点。匹兹堡大学的埃里克博士说，在出现清晰梦境的快速动眼睡眠中大脑和完全清醒时一样活跃。但并非大脑的所有部分都一样，脑边缘系统（“情绪大脑”）异常活跃，而前额皮层（思维和推理的中心地带）则相对平静大。斯坦福睡眠研究员William Dement博士说：“我们从梦中醒来，或者高兴或者沮丧，这些情绪会伴随我们一整天。”
梦和情绪之间的联系在Cartwright的诊所的病人身上显露出来了。多数人似乎在晚上入睡的较早阶段做更多不好的梦，而在快睡醒前会逐渐做开心一些的梦，这说明人们在梦里渐渐克服了白天的不良情绪。因为清醒时我们的头脑被日常琐事占据着，所以并不总是想到白天发生的事情对我们情绪的影响，直到我们开始做梦，这种影响才出现。
这一过程不一定是无意识的。Cartwright认为人们可以练习有意识地控制噩梦的重演。你一醒来就立刻确定梦中有什么在困扰你，设想一下你所希望的梦的结局，下次再做同样的梦时，试图醒来以控制它的进程。通过多次练习，人们完全可以学会在梦中这样做。
Cartwright说，说到底，只要梦不使我们无法睡眠或“从梦中惊醒”，就没有理由太在意所做的梦。恐怖主义、经济不确定及通常的不安全感都增加了人们的焦虑。那些长期受到噩梦折磨的人应该寻求专家帮助，而对其他人来说，大脑有自动消除不良情绪的方法。安心睡觉甚至做梦，早上醒来时你会感觉好多了。
American no longer expect public figures, whether in speech or in writing, to command the English language with skill and gift. Nor do they aspire to such command themselves. In his latest book, Doing Our Own Thing:The Degradation of language and Music and why we should like, care, John McWhorter, a linguist and controversialist of mixed liberal and conservative views, sees the triumph of 1960s counter-culture as responsible for the decline of formal English.
Blaming the permissive 1960s is nothing new, but this is not yet another criticism against the decline in ecation. Mr.McWhorter’s academic speciality is language history and change, and he sees the graal disappearance of “whom” ,for example, to be natural and no more regranttable than the loss of the case-endings of Old English.
But the cult of the authentic and the personal, “doing our own thing”, has spelt the death of formal speech, writing, poetry and music. While even the modestly ecated sought an elevated tone when they put pen to paper before the 1960s, even the most well regarded writing since then has sought to capture spoken English on the page. Equally, in poetry, the highly personal, performative genre is the only form that could claim real liveliness. In both oral and written English, talking is triumphing over speaking, spontaneity over craft.
Illustrated with an entertaining array of examples from both high and low culture, the trend that Mr. McWhorter documents is unmistakable. But it is less clear, to take the question of his subtitle, why we should, like care. As a linguist, he acknowledges that all varieties of human language, including non-standard ones like Black English, can be powerfully expressive-there exists no language or dialect in the world that cannot convey complex ideas .He is not arguing, as many do, that we can no longer think straight because we do not talk proper.
Russians have a deep love for their own language and carry large chunks of memorized poetry in their heads, while Italian politicians tend to elaborate speech that would seem old-fashioned to most English-speakers. Mr. McWhorter acknowledges that formal language is not strictly necessary, and proposes no radical ecation reforms-he is really grieving over the loss of something beautiful more than useful. We now take our English “on paper plates instead of china”. A shame, perhaps, but probably an inevitable one.
美国人已不再期待公众人物在演讲或写作中能运用技巧和文采来驾驭英语，而公众人物自己也不渴望这样。语言学家麦荷特喜好争论，他的观点混杂着自由派与保守派的看法。在他最近的书《做我们自己的事：语言和音乐的退化，以及为什么我们应该喜欢或在意？》中，这位学者认为60年代反文化运动的胜利要对正式英语的退化负责。
责备放纵的六十年代不是什么新鲜事，但这次算不上是对教育衰落的又一场批判。麦荷特先生的学术专长在于语言史和语言演变。举例来说，他认为“whom”一词的逐渐消失是自然的，并不比古英语中词格尾缀的消失更让人惋惜。
然而，“做自己的事”这一对事务真实性和个人性的崇高信条，已经导致了正式演讲、写作、诗歌及音乐的消亡。在20世纪60年代以前，仅受过一般教育的人在下笔时都会寻求一种更高雅的强调；而那之后，即使是最受关注的文章也开始逮住口语就写在纸面上。同样的，对于诗歌来说，非常个性化和富有表现力的创作风格成为了能够表达真实生动含义的唯一形式。无论作为口语还是书面语的英语，随意言谈胜过雅致的言辞，自我发挥也压过了精心准备。
麦荷特显示先生从上层和下层文化中列举了一系列有趣的例子，从而说明他记录的这种趋势是确凿无误的。但就书中副标题中的疑问：为什么我们应该、喜欢或在意，答案却不够明确。作为语言学家，麦荷特认为各种各样的人类语言，包括像黑人语言这样的非标准语言，都具有强大的表达力――世上没有传达不了复杂思想的语言或方言。不像其他大多数人，麦荷特先生并不认为我们说话方式不再规范就会使我们不能够准确的思考。
俄罗斯人深爱自己的语言，并在脑海中存储了大量诗歌；而意大利的政客们往往精心准备演讲，即使这在大多数讲英语的人们眼里已经过时。麦荷特先生认为正式语言并非不可或缺，也没有提出要进行彻底的教育改革――他其实只是为那些美好事务而不是实用品的消逝而哀叹。我们现在用“纸盘子”而非“瓷盘子”装着我们的英语大餐。真是惭愧啊，但很可能已无法避免。

Ⅲ 医学博士英语国家统考试卷谁来判卷

发往北京！由北京组织机构判卷！

Ⅳ 博士英语阅读理解

英文阅读理解—读到了什么，读懂了什么，读成了什么？

引言

阅读理解究竟何谓？在《教育大辞典》给出了如下的定义：

阅读理解（reading comprehension）[是]通过书面言语的感知获得意义的思维过程。影响它的外部因素有：文字材料和情境的物理特点（如照明条件、文字字体和型号）、文字材料的难易程度（如字词的常用程度、句子的长短和结构的繁简）、材料的概括和抽象程度以及由外部确定的阅读目的和要求等。内部因素有：阅读态度、阅读方式、基础知识、口头言语能力等。与阅读速度在一定范围内呈正相关。阅读理解可分为微观分析和宏观分析两种过程。前者包括字词解码（把视觉符号转化为语音）、词义获得和句子理解三个步骤，是对文字材料中的主要结构成分分解和重组的过程；后者包括段落分析和话语分析两个步骤，是理解整个文意的过程。对于阅读理解的检查，有学者提出四条标准：回答问题的能力、对给予的大量材料作出摘要的能力、用自己的语言和不同的词复述材料的能力和把材料从一种语言转译为另一种语言的能力。(《教育大辞典》编纂委员会 1998)

本文既然谈English的阅读理解，则被阅读的自然应该是English。因此，从这个角度思考一下上面的定义中是否能够看出其对于中国的学习English的学生来说，对他们的‘English阅读理解’会有什么帮助？恐怕不容易直接看出来。

为什么不容易直接看出来？本文从上面定义中最后面的四条标准中谈到的四种能力，结合‘English阅读理解’，转述一下这四条标准，即：在完成English的阅读之后，应该用English回答问题，应该用English做出摘要，应该用English复述材料，以及应该将读到的English的笔语转译为English的口语，这样才能称作是English阅读理解。换一种说法就是，既然是English的阅读理解，则读到的应该是English，读懂的应该是English，读成的也应该是English。也就是说，在微观分析和宏观分析这两种过程中，如果是English的阅读理解，就完全应该用English来进行，用汉语等于没用，用错了。

本文请问，中国的学习English的学生是否掌握了这四种能力？是否读到、读懂、读成的都是English？分析过程也是English呢？恐怕没有。不但是没有，在实际的教学活动中，这四种使用English的能力同两种使用English的分析过程恐怕并没有被提高到应有的重视程度。

对此，可能会有不少反对意见，如‘阅读完English后应该是用汉语回答问题，用汉语总结，用汉语复述，转译成中文，怎么能用英语呢？’或者‘读到的自然是English没错，可是读懂的应该是中文，读成的也应该是中文嘛，怎么能是English呢？读懂English太难了，翻译成中文读懂多容易呀。’甚至极有可能无限上纲，说什么‘学英语学到了贵文说到的那种水平，不是学成英国人了吗？那还学英语干什么，直接去英国好了。’对于这样的意见，本文只能问一个问题，就是：‘既然如此众多的中国学生在学English，而这‘众多’两个字大概有三、四亿之多，那么，其目的到底是学会English，还是学不会英语反而学会汉语？’应该有这样一种共识，即，把英文读成中文，达到的结果是用中文总结起来得比用英文好得多，根本就不能叫做学会英文，只能叫做巩固中文。

结论Conclusion

在过去30年甚至100年来中国的English学习中，学生在阅读English时往往并没有真正理解English，而不过是理解了翻译出来的‘错多于对’的汉语。因为翻译以原文为准，没有对，只有不同程度的错，可译性永远达不到百分之百。这种汉化的阅读方法，读懂的不是English，理解的也不是English，若要达到在完成English的阅读之后，直接用English回答问题，直接用English做出摘要，直接用English复述材料，以致直接将读到的English的笔语转译为English的口语能够自由自然地说出English的水平就非常困难了。

直白一点说，一名既学中文又学英文的学生，而且希望学好English，如果读了一段，一篇，一本‘用中文从来不曾读过’的真正英文的资料后，居然用汉语白话得比英文还好，那就不叫学English，而是‘学反了’，学成中文了！阅读中文后应该汉语白话得好，阅读English后当然应该English白话得好了！如果想要学好English的话。这种近乎常识的道理基本是不需要旁征博引，遍访名家教授，包括某些观念错误的名家，以至于翻遍故纸堆去找证明的！

因此，本文建议，如果真正希望将English学成English，就不能将English读成中文，而要从初次接触English的‘零起步’就开始确定自己的阅读方法同目标，这样才有可能学好English。这时，儿童需要家长成为‘明人’，学生需要教师成为‘明人’，或者既然别人成不了明人，那就干脆自己成为‘明人’，真正明白的明人。如果一名中国的小学生从四年级开始接触English，能做到把English当作English来学习，来记忆，来运用，到了十二年级，其English的水平完全能够达到English国家十二年级毕业的English水平，而且更应该达到用English学习所有初、高中课程，不论是数理化文史哲还是音乐体育美术劳作，包括进一步用English来学习所有的大学专业课程，任何专业，进一步攻读硕士、博士都能做到得心应手，很容易成为‘世界型’的人才。

因此，如果真想学好English，在阅读时就应该只考虑三个小问题，不是大问题：‘读到了什么？读懂了什么？读成了什么？’。答案只有两个：English或是中文。读懂了中文甚至读成了中文保证能学好中文，但是却很难保证学好English，即使学好了English也等于多费了几遍事，费劲多转了几十遍没有用处的圈子才能学好，事倍功半，浪费生命，得不偿失。

最后，If you want to learn English well, you need to read English and understand your reading in English, and try to be able to tell in English what you have read and answer in English questions about your reading. If you understand instead in Chinese your reading in English, that does not help your English at all. If you really want to learn English, you need to think it, speak it, write it, hear and understand it, read and understand it, and dream it, all in real English without any Chinese at all. Try that and your English will become your English, will be your English, not your Chinglish or your Han English or your China English. Your English and you will become one, a unity of your English and you, and your English will be yours for ever, if you want it to be. (十年级水平的English)

所有带汉字的教英文的出版物一律不要用！

祝进步。

Ⅳ 哪些英语杂志以医疗，卫生，健康为主题可以做为医学类考博英语的阅读材料。

《全国医学博士英语统考综合应试教程(附光盘第4版卓越医学考博英语应试教材)》编著者任雁等。 本书是卫生部组织的全国医学博士英语统一考试辅导丛书之一。

Ⅵ 求2005年考研英语二真题阅读部分的答案

英语二是从2010年才开始考的，不可能有2005年的英语二真题

Ⅶ 本人医学生，考博英语怎么复习

主要针对听力和阅读
先说听力，我觉得一切不以听懂为最终目的听力技巧都是内耍流氓。所以练听力首先力求听容懂，可以试着找找你感兴趣的课件进行听写，材料不要太长，以考博英语的听力难度而言，科学60秒和经济学人就足够了，一个美音一个英音，这俩材料语速都快，所以一开始听不懂不要着急，慢慢来。每周3-4个课件听写坚持下来，听力绝对有提高。备考可以在希赛上面做真题，很多免费题目可以练习刷题找感觉那种。
再说阅读，这个我真是头大，考博英语阅读属于那种你把文章读懂了都不会选答案的坑爹题。有些真题的答案让我感觉匪夷所思，完全不是常人能理解的脑回路。而且我还属于那种思维比较奔逸的选手，经常一看题觉得TM哪个都对。那准备的话自然是真题为主了，尽量跟上出题者那野马一样狂奔的思路（其实我最后也闹明白）。不推荐做阅读的模拟题，出题思路不一样，做了意义不大。

Ⅷ 关于医学博士英语统考

你是打算申请国内的还是国外的- -国内的我不清楚 国外的我比较清楚内
亲 英语不好去报个雅容思班吧。。。也不一定要参加雅思托福考试 就是我觉得那样的学习英语是最实用最效率的 我就是零基础那么来的 半年到一年的时间 听说读写保证都给你攻上来 材料那些辅导学校也准备的有

Ⅸ 医学博士考博英语真题解析，听力能有吗

正规书籍中好像没有历年医学报考英语真题，但是有很多专门对医学考博英语复习准备的资料，可以直接购买练习。有些资料必须通过自己去寻找，主要参加医学报考的人数相对考研少很多很多。