㈠ 考研英语阅读做完后翻译全文----是自己不看译文翻译出写纸上,然后再看译文修改 还是边翻译边看译文呢
这个要看个人的习惯和效果。一般来说最好自己翻译一遍，然后与译文核对并修改。
“我感激不敬”
都要考研的人了，怎么汉语还会犯这种错误？难道说你是蓄意的？
㈡ 考研英语一阅读全文翻译
建议你是要自己一句句得翻译，如果都弄明白，相信你会得到很大得进步得
㈢ 考研英语真题详解有没有阅读的翻译
2016考研英语(一)翻译真题参考译文及考点详细
搜索网络文库即可，不能发布链接，按名字搜索。
㈣ 考研英语阅读及翻译题的来源
一、年考研英语文章出处 摘选自《2011年考研英语大逆转》
1.完形填空 纽约时报（The New York Times） The Cost of Smarts
www.nytimes.com/2008/05/07/opinion/07wed4.html
2.阅读第一篇 纽约时报（The New York Times） Can You Become a Creature of New Habits？
www.nytimes.com/2008/05/07/opinion/07wed4.html
3.阅读第二篇 科学美国人（Scientific American） Who’’s Your Daddy？ The Answer May Be at the Drugstore
www.sciam.com/article.cfm？id=who-is-your-daddy-the-answer-may-be-at-the-drugstore
4.阅读第三篇 麦肯锡季刊（The Mckinsey Quarterly） Ecating global workers
www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Ecating_global_workers_1375
5..新题型
encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761561730_6/Culture.html
二、2010年考研英语阅读及翻译题的来源
2010年知识运用试题来源：
考研英语完型填空部分，使用了2009年6月6日 Economist 《经济学人》杂志上的一篇文章，文章主要内容，是对社会学上一个经典的理论：霍桑效应的批判和反思。文章难度适中。命题专家在出题的时候也进行了一定程度的改写。
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_569c4e040100dmkj.html questioning the Hawthorne effect 或Light work; Questioning the Hawthorne effect，June 6, 2009
2010年考研英语阅读真题出处：
第二篇阅读文章
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_09/b4073068471067.htm
第三篇阅读文章：
Harvard_Business_Review200702，标题是：The Accidental Influentials
第四篇阅读文章
Accounting rules are under attack. Standard-setters should defend them. Politicians and banks should back off. Economist Staff - The Economist《经济学人》杂志，April 10, 2009
新题型试题的来源：
http://jobfunctions.bnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=104383，A Wholesale Shift in European Groceries
2010年翻译真题出处：
原文选自李奥帕德的《沙郡岁月：李奥帕德的自然沉思》，本书是环保生态的经典著作，中译本由吴美真翻译，中国社会科学出版社出版。
给2011年参加考研的学生的几点建议：
1．打好基础，从文章的改写情况和考试命题趋势来看，考研对于大纲词汇要求还是很严格的，所以在准备考试之初就要背好单词，突破单词关。
2．选择较新的辅导材料和语言素材，从最近几年的考试来看，考研阅读理解部分的文章和 考题的风格紧扣时代的节奏，主题很鲜明突出。因此选择合适的考研阅读素材来加强阅读显得非常重要。
三、2010年1月MBA翻译题的来源：摘选自《决胜MBA英语高级篇》
原文是来自一份杂志，叫“experience life”，出题人做了部分改动，原文和改动的文章如下：
Sustainability has become something of a buzzword（出题人把这个单词改为popular word） these days, but to Ted Ning, the concept will always have personal meaning. Having enred a painful period of unsustainability in his own life made it clear to him that sustainability-oriented values must be expressed through everyday action and choice.
Ning, director of LOHAS (Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability), the Boulder, Colo.–based information clearinghouse on sustainable living, recalls spending a tumultuous（出题人把这个词改为了confusing） year in the late ’90s selling insurance. He’d been through the dot-com boom and bust（出题人似乎把这个词改为burst了） and, desperate for a job, signed on with a Boulder agency.
It didn’t go well. “It was a really bad move because that’s not my passion,” says Ning, whose ambivalence about the job translated, predictably, into a lack of sales. “I was miserable. I had so much anxiety that I would pull alongside of the highway and vomit, or wake up in the middle of the night and stare at the ceiling. I had no money and needed the job. Everyone said, ‘Just wait, you’ll turn the corner, give it some time.’”
Ning stuck it out for a year because he simply didn’t know what else to do, but felt his happiness and health suffer as a result. He eventually quit and stumbled upon LOHAS in a help-wanted ad for a data analyst. “I didn’t know what LOHAS was,” he says, “but it sounded kinda neat.” It turned out to be a better fit than he could have ever imagined.
At the time, the LOHAS organization did little more than host a small annual conference in Boulder. It was a forum where progressive-minded companies could gather to compare notes on how to reach a values-driven segment of consumers — the LOHAS market — who seemed attracted to procts and services that mirrored their interest in health, environmental stewardship, social justice, personal development and sustainable living.
In contrast with his disastrous foray into the insurance business, Ning’s new job felt like coming home. Growing up in the foothills of the Rockies outside of Denver, he’d developed a love of the outdoors and a respect for the earth, while his parents provided a model of social activism — the family traveled widely, and at one point his parents created and operated a nonprofit that offered microcredit loans to small businesses in Vietnam and Guatemala. He has three adopted sisters from Vietnam and Korea. He studied international relations and Chinese at Colorado University and slipped easily into the Boulder lifestyle — commuting by bike, eating organics, buying local and the rest — though he stopped short of the patchouli-and-dreadlocks phase embraced by many of his peers. (He opted instead for the university’s ski team and, after graating, wound up coaching the Japanese development team ring the Nagano Olympics in 1998.)
From his ground-level job, Ning moved quickly up the ranks in the organization, becoming its executive director in 2006. “When I got the job, LOHAS was a sleepy conference in Boulder,” says Ning. Today, the forum is booming, the organization is expanding and the market is evolving. Ning has more than grown into the position he stumbled on in the want ads. “I don’t consider this a job. It is really more of a calling.”
Ning, 41, coordinates the conference and oversees the organization’s annual journal and Web site (www.lohas.com), while compiling research on trends and opportunities for businesses. He also travels the country promoting — and explaining — the LOHAS concept and the burgeoning market it represents.
First identified by sociologist Paul Ray in the mid-1990s as “cultural creatives,” the U.S. market segment that embraces LOHAS today has grown to about 41 million consumers, or roughly 19 percent of American alts. But those LOHAS consumers are powerfully influencing the attitudes and behaviors of others (witness the rise of interest in yoga, all-natural procts, simplicity and hybrid vehicles). Which is why LOHAS-related procts now generate an estimated $209 billion annually.
“Over the last two years a green tidal wave has come over us,” says Ning. Riding that wave, says Ning, is not about jumping on a trend bandwagon. It’s connecting with — and acting on — a set of shared, instrinsic values. “People know what is authentic. You can’t preach this lifestyle and not live it,” he says. He and his wife, Jenifer, live in a solar-powered home, raise organic vegetables in their backyard and drive a car that gets 48 miles to the gallon. He even buys carbon offsets to negate the global warming impact of his cell phone.
Ning emphasizes that there are many different ways of “living LOHAS.” Ultimately, it’s really about finding a way of life that makes sense and feels good — now and for the long haul. “People are looking internally,” he says, “asking themselves, ‘What really makes me happy?’ Is it the fact that I can go out and buy that giant flat-screen TV, or is it that I can have a quiet evening with my family just hanging out and playing a game of Scrabble?”
For Ning, it’s a no-brainer. He’ll take Scrabble every time.
㈤ 08年考研英语阅读理解第三篇翻译
08年考研英语阅读理解第三篇翻译：
在世纪60年代早期，Wilt Chamberlain是美国国家篮球协会中仅有的身高超过7英尺的三个人之一。可是如果他参加了上个赛季的话，他就变成了42分之一了。这些年来在较大的职业体育运动中的运动员的身体状况发生了很大的改变，而他们的经理人也更愿意调整队员的运动服来适应队员们更大，更高的身材。
虽然体育界的这种趋势可能蒙蔽了一个没有被承认的现实：美国人基本上停止生长了。虽然现在人们比140年前高了2英寸，特别是那些出生在已移民美国很多代的那些人，但是明显的，在二十世纪60年代早期，已经到达了他们的身高的极限。他们已经不可能再长得更高了。“在这个基因和环境的条件下，现在整体的人们已经长到我们能够达到的范围了，”Wright州大学的人类学家William Cameron Chumlea说道。拿NBA球员来说，他们身高的增加主要由于从世界各地招募到了球员。
身高的增长一般在20岁以后就停止了，而发育是需要能量和营养的，其中的蛋白质用来供给组织的生长。在20世纪初，营养不良和儿童疾病妨碍了整体的发育。但是当饮食和健康的促进，儿童和青少年平均每20年都增长了大概1.5英寸，这就是长高的趋势。根据疾病防治中心，从1960年开始，人们的平均身高，男性5英尺9英寸，女性5英尺4英寸，就没有怎么改变了。
总的说来，避免太高的身高是有很多优点的。在生产时，较大的婴儿通过产道是有更多的问题的。而且，就算人类已经直立行走已经几百万年了，我们的脚和背部继续对抗着巨大的压力，这些压力来源于双足直立的姿势和巨大的肢体。“有一些限制是个体器官的基因结构导致的。”西北大学的人类学家William Leonard说道。
基因的最大化可以改变，但是不要期待它会马上就能发生。Mass州的Natick的军队研究中心的高级人类学家Claire C. Gordon确信百分之九十的入伍新兵不需要更换新的制服和工作站。她说，不像那些篮球制服，军队的制服长度很长时间都没有改变了。如果你需要在不远的将来预测人类的身高而去设计一款新的设备，Gordon说基本上，“你都能够使用现在的数据并且觉得非常地自信。”
Text 3
In the early 1960s Wilt Chamberlain was one of only three players in the National Basketball Association (NBA) listed at over seven feet. If he had played last season, however, he would have been one of 42. The bodies playing major professional sports have changed dramatically over the years, and managers have been more than willing to adjust team uniforms to fit the growing numbers of bigger, longer frames.
The trend in sports, though, may be obscuring an unrecognized reality: Americans have generally stopped growing. Though typically about two inches taller now than 140 years ago, today’s people – especially those born to families who have lived in the U.S. for many generations – apparently reached their limit in the early 1960s. And they aren’t likely to get any taller. “In the general population today, at this genetic, environmental level, we’ve pretty much gone as far as we can go,” says anthropologist William Cameron Chumlea of Wright State University. In the case of NBA players, their increase in height appears to result from the increasingly common practice of recruiting players from all over the world.
Growth, which rarely continues beyond the age of 20, demands calories and nutrients – notably, protein – to feed expanding tissues. At the start of the 20th century, under-nutrition and childhood infections got in the way. But as diet and health improved, children and adolescents have, on average, increased in height by about an inch and a half every 20 years, a pattern known as the secular trend in height. Yet according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, average height – 5′9″ for men, 5′4″ for women – hasn’t really changed since 1960.
Genetically speaking, there are advantages to avoiding substantial height. During childbirth, larger babies have more difficulty passing through the birth canal. Moreover, even though humans have been upright for millions of years, our feet and back continue to struggle with bipedal posture and cannot easily withstand repeated strain imposed by oversize limbs. “There are some real constraints that are set by the genetic architecture of the indivial organism,” says anthropologist William Leonard of Northwestern University.
Genetic maximums can change, but don’t expect this to happen soon. Claire C. Gordon, senior anthropologist at the Army Research Center in Natick, Mass., ensures that 90 percent of the uniforms and workstations fit recruits without alteration. She says that, unlike those for basketball, the length of military uniforms has not changed for some time. And if you need to predict human height in the near future to design a piece of equipment, Gordon says that by and large, “you could use today’s data and feel fairly confident.”
㈥ 1994年的考研英语阅读第四篇，里面这个翻译的再是不是有误
其实翻译的是对的，再耐心的结合上下文你就能发现，文章表达的意思是，随着医疗条件改善，患癌人群存活率将在原来的基础上得到提高，也就是说患癌人群可以活的再久一点
㈦ 做考研英语真题后，翻译近30多篇真题阅读，这样做对其它题型帮助大吗
有用，非常有用！！！
每天一篇，逐句翻译，你能发现自己到底是长难句有问题还是单纯的词汇问题。把翻译不出来或者翻译的很糟糕的句子拿出来，最后一个星期反复写，进步很快。
㈧ 考研英语阅读真题做第一遍时需要认真一句一句翻译在纸上吗
這樣不好最好現大意看一遍再一句一句去翻譯
㈨ 考研英语完型加阅读加翻译、一共多少篇 。
1完型
4阅读
1新题型
1翻译
共7篇