1. 如何寫英語中的駁論文
http://wenku..com/view/c38f30543c1ec5da50e27082.html
2. 寫作 列舉常見的駁論方法有哪些
反問法。
環扣法。
論述法。
舉例法。
3. 英語作文議論文
範文：
The summer holiday is coming. Our class have a discussion about what to do ring the holiday.
Some are in favor of staying at home. They think it』s both convenient and comfortable. What』s more, they can save money for other purposes. But they will lose the chance of getting to know the outside world. However, others prefer to go out for traveling since it can increase their knowledge and broaden their horizons. But they will spend more money and meet some difficulties while traveling.
In my opinion, it would be much better to stay at home, for I can do what I like, such as reading books, watching TV, and helping my parents with the housework.
4. 英語駁論文大學是否該成為旅遊熱點
文大學是否該成為旅遊熱點
肯定好的，對好
對
5. 我要寫駁論文，如何反駁英語不好證明愛國，最好有事例，有引用
我提供一個思路吧。
既然「英語不好」是「愛國」的充分條件，這個命題成立。那麼「不回愛國」也答可以得出「英語好」（這是逆否命題，必然成立），而實際上「不愛國」的人很多「英語不好」，所以推翻了「英語不好證明愛國」這一命題！
6. 求高級英語寫作 駁論文 寫法及模板一份
In any academic area or professional field, it is just as important to recognize the limits of our knowledge and understanding as it is to acquire new facts and information.「
Personally, I hold that knowledge knows no bounds, therefore, on realizing this awkwardness, the only thing man should do is to absorb as much new knowledge as he can for the sake of not lagging behind the pacing steps of our world.
但是作者完全是從另外一個角度去論證，且看下文。
Does recognizing the limits of our knowledge and understanding serve us equally well as acquiring new facts and information, as the speaker asserts?注意這一句經典的反問式開頭了，這是最引人注目的。While our everyday experience might lend credence to this assertion, further reflection reveals its fundamental inconsistency with our Western view of how we acquire knowledge. Nevertheless,雖然是原則上不盡同意但還是提出妥協的辦法，從而顯出作者是critical thinking的，這一點很重要，也是拿分的重頭戲也。a careful and thoughtful definition of knowledge can serve to reconcile the two.
讓我們記一記一些好詞好句：lend credence to this assertion (有足夠的證據)證明這一觀點的正確性;further reflection reveals its fundamental inconsistency with…;Nevertheless, a careful and thoughtful definition of knowledge can serve to reconcile the two.
On the one hand, the speaker"s assertion accords with the everyday experience of working professionals. For example, the sort of "book」knowledge that medical, law, and business students acquire, no matter how extensive, is of little use unless these students also learn to accept the uncertainties and risks inherent in professional practice and in the business world.
Any successful doctor, lawyer, or entrepreneur would undoubtedly agree that new precedents and challenges in their fields compel them to acknowledge the limitations of their knowledge, and that learning to accommodate these limitations is just as important in their professional success as knowledge itself.
在駁論的第一段，作者就舉例子說明知識的有限性並不一定意味著各行各業的人就必須汲取其他方面的知識，恰恰相反，對於醫生、律師或企業家來說意識到了自我知識的有限，並且尋求方法去適應調和這一有限性反而是必要的。
Moreover, the additional knowledge we gain by collecting more information often diminishes-sometimes to the point where marginal gains turn to marginal losses. Consider, for instance, the collection of financial- investment information. No amount of knowledge can eliminate the uncertainty and risk inherent in financial investing. Also, information overload can result in confusion, which in turn can diminish one"s ability to assimilate information and apply it usefully. Thus, by recognizing the limits of their knowledge, and by accounting for those limits when making decisions, investment advisors can more effectively serve their clients.
作者進一步通過金融投資業信息的贅余的危害性來駁斥原文的觀點。
On the other hand, the speaker"s assertion seems self-contradictory, for how can we know the limits of our knowledge until we"ve thoroughly tested those limits through exhaustive empirical observation--that is, by acquiring facts and information. For example, it would be tempting to concede that we can never understand the basic forces that govern all matter in the universe. Yet e to increasingly precise and extensive fact- finding efforts of scientists, we might now be within striking distance of understanding the key laws by which all physical matter behaves. Put another way, the speaker"s assertion flies in the face of悍然不顧，公然違抗the scientific method, whose fundamental tenet is that we humans can truly know only that which we observe. Thus Francis Bacon, who first formulated the method, might assert that the speaker is fundamentally incorrect.
說實話，我覺得這一段里，作者玩了一個詭辯的小伎倆：先是指出原文觀點的自相矛盾性，然後引出自己的看法——認識論遠重要於獲取新的事實和信息，也就是要「先認識知識和理解力的局限然後才是攝取新知。」
How can we reconcile our experience in everyday endeavors with the basic assumption underlying the scientific method? Perhaps the answer lies in a distinction between two types of knowledge--one which amounts to a mere collection of observations (i.e., facts and information), the other which is deeper and includes a realization of principles and truths underlying those observations. At this deeper level "knowledge" equals "under- standing": how we interpret, make sense of, and find meaning in the information we collect by way of observation.
作者就上一段提出的問題推出自己的解決方法，即認識到「知識」分成兩種：純觀察行為所得的信息;萃取之後的經過自己消化後的「理解」。但我覺得這里還有待發揮，估計是時間不夠了，倉促間收筆吧。沒有很好的說明白。
In the final analysis, evaluating the speaker"s assertion requires that we define "knowledge,"which in turn requires that we address complex epistemological issues best left to philosophers and theologians. Yet perhaps this is the speaker"s point: that we can never truly know either ourselves or the world, and that by recognizing this limitation we set ourselves free to accomplish what no amount of mere information could ever permit.
最後一句玩了復雜句的構句技巧，想搏ets一笑。但我覺得還是總結的不夠好，沒有說到點子上。其實，我們平實的寫作大可不必如此玩弄文字，因為如果當別人都不知道你在說什麼的話，一味專心於難句，無異於「喧賓奪主」了。個人認為，作者寫得有點不知所雲了。
7. 如何寫英語駁論文
駁論文通常由三種段落組成:1)引入段(Introctory paragraph); 2)主體段(Body para-graph);3)結尾段(Conclusion paragraph)。引入段是文章的導言。作者往版往在導言中點明文章的主題或中權心論點。在引入段,要提出文章的中心論點。在結尾段,駁論文要重申作者的觀點，形成結論，以強調論證效果。主體段則採用「欲揚先抑,欲擒故縱」的方法,先承認對方的觀點有一定的道理,然後筆鋒陡轉,批駁對方的片面觀點,闡述反駁的理由。
8. 駁論文用英語怎麼說
debate
9. 我想參加雅思考試，雅思寫作立論和駁論文體有什麼技巧啊
雅思寫作在雅思備考中是很重要的一部分，烤鴨存在著很多的雅思寫作誤區，建議大家在備考的時候多練習雅思復習資料，這樣可以幫助我們熟悉題型。下面小編就給大家介紹一下關於雅思寫作常見誤區的相關內容，希望可以幫助正在准備雅思備考的同學。
備考雅思寫作的時候，建議大多練習下雅思復習資料，能夠幫助我們去熟悉題型，另外關於烤鴨常見的寫作誤區，真的有非常多。
烤鴨寫作誤區
詞不達意
關於詞彙的問題在中烤鴨這里可謂是比比皆是啊。篇文章是思想的載體，而詞往往是這個載體的基本組成要素。沒有單詞，那麼我們就無法准確地表達思想。由於自己所掌握的單詞有限，所以往往就會使學生感到自己「滿腹的心裡話不知怎麼說」，為了能夠寫完篇250多字的作文，往往只能夠搜腸刮肚，勉強拼湊，結果還會使思路受到限制，導致寫出來的句子總是不能夠表達出我們自己的本來意圖，文章主題反倒直接成了載體的奴隸。
二、文章可讀性不佳
備考雅思寫作的時候，建議大多練習下雅思復習資料，能夠幫助我們去熟悉題型。由於同學們對於寫作的詞彙掌握得不足，所以在寫作文時，往往都是個單詞在文中不斷的重復出現，結果就會使得自己的作文讀起來是索然無味的。如有的學生就只知道「促進」詞可以使用improve,於是在寫作時，只要是需要寫「促進」的地方，他都會把improve詞搬上去，殊不知，「促進」詞其實還可以用promote,enhance,advance,facilitate,甚至是strengthen等詞表達。但是這些並不意味著這幾個詞就可以去隨時互換，學生在用的時候也是需要去根據具體的情景而選擇具體的詞。
此外，我們發現有的學生在運用片語時總是不能准確把握其固定搭配，尤其是在對些動詞片語中具體搭配的介詞等小品詞，結果寫出來的句子往往會令人產生誤解。
關於這些寫作的誤區，大家要多加註意才行，備考寫作的時候多練習雅思復習資料，往往能夠令我們數字寫作的各式題型。
10. 英語中駁論文如何說
Argument
本書共7章，結合ETS公示的GRE寫作考試的題庫，對於如何進行GRE立論文內(Issue)和駁論文(Argument)的寫作進容行講解，書中還提供了詳細的英文論證語言、論據支持、文化歷史背景以及名言警句。