❶ 辯論比賽 論題：對於改善錯誤獎勵比懲罰要好 請正反雙方都舉幾個例子,內容要求達到1分鍾就可以了
汗 你是幾辯啊 就要例子 你方既然是獎勵 首先你要知道的是你的出發點是獎勵和懲罰都有好處 只是獎勵更好 這是打辯論的人都知道的基礎 你連個主線都沒有 怎麼想例子
❷ 英語作文"獎賞還是懲罰,哪個更有利於確保市民的安全"
In today's society,there are many unsafe factors,we in the face at the same time there are also many safe hidden trouble.
Punishment,and of the citizen's prevention is very important.
Countries should formulate strict laws to ensure everyone's safety.
Citizens also need self-defense force.
There are only two forces exist at the same time.
Just can have security of society.
❸ 為什麼懲罰更容易導致犯罪的英語作文
Punishments authorized in modern U.S. law include community service, monetary fines, Forfeiture of property, restitution to victims, confinement in jail or prison, and death.
Some civil sanctions are punitive in nature. The primary aim, though, in most civil cases is to compensate the victim. However, a judge or jury may assess Punitive Damages against a party in a civil case if that party's conct was especially wicked. Punitive damages are intended to punish a party or set an example for similar wrongdoers. Though onerous, punitive damages in a civil case do not carry with them the same stigma attached to criminal punishment.
Human transgressions have been punished in various ways throughout history. The standard punishments in ancient Greek and Roman societies were death, Slavery, mutilation (Corporal Punishment), imprisonment, or Banishment. Some punishments were especially creative. In ancient Rome, for example, a person who murdered a close relative was enclosed in a sack with a cock, a viper, a dog, and a monkey, and then cast into the sea.
The ancient punishments were brought to England. Until the nineteenth century, the death penalty, or Capital Punishment, was imposed in England for more than 200 different crimes. Most of these crimes were petty violations, such as pick-pocketing or swindling. A defendant could be hanged, burned at the stake, or beheaded. In some cases the process of death was drawn out. A person found guilty of Treason, for example, was placed on a rack and stretched, hanged until not quite dead, then disemboweled, beheaded, and quartered (cut into four pieces).
Until the nineteenth century, corporal punishment in England could consist of whipping, branding, or the cutting off of a body part. Noses, ears, hands, fingers, toes, and feet were all subject to removal for criminal acts. Often the body part sliced off was the part thought responsible for the act. A pickpocket, for example, might have a hand cut off, and a spy might lose an ear, tongue, or eye. Corporal punishment could be inflicted in addition to other punishments, such as banishment, forced labor, or short-term incarceration.
The American colonies adopted and cultivated the traditional punishments of England. The most common punishments were corporal and capital. Petty criminals were often sentenced to a combination of corporal punishment and incarceration in jail for several months. The punishment for more serious crimes was usually death.
Punishment was the most comprehensive and severe in colonies founded on religious principles. In Massachusetts, controlled by the Puritans, a woman who committed Altery could be forced to wear the letter A in public as a punishing reminder of her conct. Men who committed altery were put to death, as were those who engaged in bestiality.
The witch trials in Salem, Massachusetts, illustrated the inventiveness of punishment in some of the colonies. In 1692, 19 people were executed after children claimed that several women were practicing witchcraft. One of the alleged witnesses, who refused to participate in the trials, was slowly pressed to death under the weight of heavy rocks.
Theories of Punishment
Governments have several theories to support the use of punishment to maintain order in society.
Theories of punishment can be divided into two general philosophies: utilitarian and retributive. The utilitarian theory of punishment seeks to punish offenders to discourage, or "deter," future wrongdoing. The retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished.
Under the utilitarian philosophy, laws should be used to maximize the happiness of society. Because crime and punishment are inconsistent with happiness, they should be kept to a minimum. Utilitarians understand that a crime-free society does not exist, but they endeavor to inflict only as much punishment as is required to prevent future crimes.
The utilitarian theory is "consequentialist" in nature. It recognizes that punishment has consequences for both the offender and society and holds that the total good proced by the punishment should exceed the total evil. In other words, punishment should not be unlimited. One illustration of consequentialism in punishment is the release of a prison inmate suffering from a debilitating illness. If the prisoner's death is imminent, society is not served by his continued confinement because he is no longer capable of committing crimes.
Under the utilitarian philosophy, laws that specify punishment for criminal conct should be designed to deter future criminal conct. Deterrence operates on a specific and a general level. General deterrence means that the punishment should prevent other people from committing criminal acts. The punishment serves as an example to the rest of society, and it puts others on notice that criminal behavior will be punished.
Specific deterrence means that the punishment should prevent the same person from committing crimes. Specific deterrence works in two ways. First, an offender may be put in jail or prison to physically prevent her from committing another crime for a specified period. Second, this incapacitation is designed to be so unpleasant that it will discourage the offender from repeating her criminal behavior.
Rehabilitation is another utilitarian rationale for punishment. The goal of rehabilitation is to prevent future crime by giving offenders the ability to succeed within the confines of the law. Rehabilitative measures for criminal offenders usually include treatment for afflictions such as mental illness, chemical dependency, and chronic violent behavior. Rehabilitation also includes the use of ecational programs that give offenders the knowledge and skills needed to compete in the job market.
The counterpart to the utilitarian theory of punishment is the retributive theory. Under this theory, offenders are punished for criminal behavior because they deserve punishment. Criminal behavior upsets the peaceful balance of society, and punishment helps to restore the balance.
The retributive theory focuses on the crime itself as the reason for imposing punishment. Where the utilitarian theory looks forward by basing punishment on social benefits, the retributive theory looks backward at the transgression as the basis for punishment.
According to the retributivist, human beings have free will and are capable of making rational decisions. An offender who is insane or otherwise incompetent should not be punished. However, a person who makes a conscious choice to upset the balance of society should be punished.
There are different moral bases for retribution. To many retributivists, punishment is justified as a form of vengeance: wrongdoers should be forced to suffer because they have forced others to suffer. This ancient principle was expressed succinctly in the Old Testament of the Judeo-Christian Bible: "When a man causes a disfigurement in his neighbour … it shall be done to him, fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth…."
To other theorists, retribution against a wrongdoer is justified to protect the legitimate rights of both society and the offender. Society shows its respect for the free will of the wrongdoer through punishment. Punishment shows respect for the wrongdoer because it allows an offender to pay the debt to society and then return to society, theoretically free of guilt and stigma.
A third major rationale for punishment is denunciation. Under the denunciation theory, punishment should be an expression of societal condemnation. The denunciation theory is a hybrid of Utilitarianism and retribution. It is utilitarian because the prospect of being publicly denounced serves as a deterrent. Denunciation is likewise retributive because it promotes the idea that offenders deserve to be punished.
The U.S. conception of punishment is a combination of the utilitarian, retributive, and denunciation theories. The most widely accepted rationale for punishment in the United States is retribution. If convicted, the sentence a defendant receives is always, at least in part, a form of retribution.
A sentence may, however, combine utilitarian ideals with retribution. For example, a defendant sentenced to prison for several years is sent there to quench the public's thirst for vengeance. At the same time, ecational programs inside the prison reflect the utilitarian goal of rehabilitation.
Our legal system shows its adherence to utilitarian ideals in the creation of systems such as pretrial diversion programs,Probation, and Parole. These systems seek to limit punishment to the extent necessary to protect society. The utilitarian philosophy is also reflected in the assignment of different punishments for different crimes and in the notion that the amount of punishment a convicted criminal receives should be in proportion to the harm caused by the crime. For example, murder calls for imprisonment or even the death penalty. A simple Assault and Battery with no serious injuries is usually punished with a short jail sentence or probation and a fine.
Judges generally have the discretion to fashion punishment according to the needs of both society and the defendant. This is an expression of utilitarian tenets. However, judicial discretion in sentencing is limited. In some cases statutes require judges to impose mandatory minimum prison sentences as punishment, and these laws stand as a monument to the retributive theory.
❹ 在企業管理中，激勵比懲罰更有效
激勵優於懲罰的道理並不復雜，但實施起來並不那麼容易。直至現在，一些民營企業（尤其是中小企業）的老闆，仍然改變不了對懲罰的崇拜。這樣的老闆永遠只能是苦苦經營的小老闆。
激勵舉報者的故事
在幾乎每一個公園里都寫著「凡偷盜花木者罰款若干」。但在紐約市的一個植物園里卻寫著「凡舉報偷盜花木者，獎勵若干」。結果在前一類公園中，花木被竊的事時有發生，而在紐約這家植物園，花木保護得很好。
愛美之心人皆有之，順手牽羊地偷幾束公園的花就難以避免。掛上「愛護花木，人人有責」或者「請君自重，勿折花木」之類的警示牌，幾乎沒什麼用——面對頑固的人性，道德說教是軟弱無力的，必須有一種保護花木的機制。「罰款若干」是懲罰機制，舉報者獎勵若干是激勵機制。從這個例子中可以看出，激勵比懲罰有效。
效率工資使怠工消失
其實這樣的例子過去和現在都不少見。在20世紀初，工人怠工是一個令工廠主防不勝防，極為頭痛的問題。雇了拿摩溫（工頭）監督工人，發現怠工即開除，懲罰夠重的了，但作用並不大。總不能每個工人一個拿摩溫，即使這些拿摩溫再敬業，也監督不過來。後來福特汽車公司採用了遠遠高於市場工資的效率工資，怠工奇跡般地消失了。
效率工資的激勵作用在於改變了怠工的成本與收益。怠工的成本是被發現後開除的風險，收益是少支出勞動的享受。當企業支付市場工資（低於效率工資，且各企業相同）時，被一個企業開除可以在其他企業找到相同工資的工作，何況被發現怠工的可能性並不大。因此，怠工的成本低，怠工就司空見慣了。但當企業支付效率工資時，被開除後難以找到這樣高工資的工作，怠工的成本就加大了。怠工成為成本大於收益的非理性行為，怠工自然消除了。公園的情況與此類似。盡管偷盜花木被懲罰，但被管理者發現的風險並不大，畢竟不是滿公園都站著管理者。當對舉報者進行獎勵時，公園的遊人受此激勵都成了管理者，偷盜花木被發現的可能性太大了，成了一件風險極大的事，居心不良者當然不敢有所作為了。在這種情況下，對公眾監督的激勵當然比對偷盜花木者的懲罰要有效得多。
激勵與懲罰要達到的目的是相同的，比如上面說到的保護花木或消除怠工，或者說它們的收益是相同的。但這兩種機制發生作用的方式不同，成本也不同。採用激勵機制時，其作用是自發的，行為者按激勵所要達到的目的去行事，簡單而見效。給舉報者獎勵，就自發地把千百萬遊人變成了不領工資的管理者，實行效率工資，就無須拿摩溫。採用懲罰機制時，其作用是消極的，還需要更多支出，例如，僱用專職監督人員及必要的設施等。這又引出了兩個問題。一是監督者也是人，他們也有個人利益，可能收取被監督者的賄賂，實現鼠貓聯盟，共同作案。這類事情現實中也不少見。即使用機器監督，操縱者還是人。二是只要收益大於成本，被監督者就會用各種方式來逃避監督，被監督者的智慧往往令監督者防不勝防。歷史上工人怠工的妙法，完全可以編一套多卷本的「怠工大全」。偷盜花木的方式也令人匪夷所思。
激勵推動廉政
激勵優於懲罰的道理並不復雜，但實施起來並不那麼容易。直至現在，一些民營企業（尤其是中小企業）的老闆仍然改變不了對懲罰的崇拜。願意雇監工，對工人規定各種懲罰條款，但卻捨不得給工人增加工資。這樣的老闆可以稱為「當代周扒皮」，永遠只能是苦苦經營的小老闆。
當然，這些小老闆的作為只要不違法，我們也無可奈何。一些由農民發家而成的小老闆，其周扒皮情結也是溶入血液里了，我懶得勸他們。但就整個社會的制度而言，激勵優於懲罰卻是重要的。當前社會關注的熱點之一，是幹部和國企領導人的腐敗問題。每年都要抓捕、甚至槍斃一批腐敗幹部，懲罰是相當嚴重的。但為什麼腐敗有加劇的趨勢，由個人腐敗變為集體腐敗，由幾十萬變為若干億呢？其實懲罰對制止腐敗的作用往往是暫時的、有限的。明朝的開國皇帝朱元璋打擊腐敗的力度，恐怕是中外歷史上最大的。貪官被滿門抄斬，甚至被剝皮的做法，威懾力不可謂不大。但明代也是中國歷史上官員最腐敗的時代之一。
換一個思路應該是激勵。這種激勵應該包括兩個內容。一是高薪養廉。我並不是說，高薪者必定廉，畢竟人的貪婪是無限的，但高薪是廉的必要條件（不是充分條件）。當官員的合法收入不足以使他過上與自己身份相稱的生活時，貪污的誘惑就要大得多。明清兩代官員收入極低，這是當時官場腐敗的原因之一。二是獎勵舉報者。像紐約那個植物園那樣，讓官員置於社會和人民的監督之下。美國經濟學家、諾貝爾獎獲得者阿瑟•劉易斯總結20世紀以後官場風氣改變時，就把新聞監督作為重要原因之一。20世紀30年代美國新聞界以揭發政治家腐敗為中心的「扒糞運動」有力推動了廉政之風。新聞界的「扒糞運動」使它們吸引了消費者，有了廣告，讓媒體通過「扒糞」來吸引讀者就是激勵——相當於對舉報者獎勵若干。
動聽的道德說教和嚴厲的懲罰，都不如激勵機制。按著這個思路去設計制度，世界就會更美好。
❺ 獎勵比懲罰更適合的英語作文
1.
Study on Project Payment Scheling Problems with Bonus-Penalty Structure from Two Viewpoints
具有獎勵懲罰結構的項目支付進度問題研究:雙重角度
2.
CHAPTER VII AWARDS AND PENALTIES
3.
The Functional Analysis of Encouragement and Penalty on Children s Socialization;
獎勵與懲罰對兒童社會化的功能分析
4.
You will be praised or blamed according as your work is well done or not.
根據你的工作表現好壞，將給予獎勵或懲罰。
5.
In a position to receive greater penalties or bonuses as a result of having won one game of a rubber. Used of bridge partners.
有局方的作為已贏得決勝盤的結果，處於收到較多懲罰或獎勵的形勢。用於橋牌的參與方
6.
Encouragement or Punishment:A Study of Incentive Mechanism Preventing Operational Mistakes in Financial Enterprise
獎勵還是懲罰:金融企業控制操作失誤的激勵機制研究
7.
Punishment, like rewards, makes sense only under the assumption that it will serve as a cause for future behavior.
懲罰與獎勵類似，只有在起到影響將來行為的作用時才有意義。
8.
Supply Chain Collaboration Mechanism Based on Penalty and Bonus under Asymmetric Information
非對稱信息下基於懲罰和獎勵的供應鏈協同機制
9.
On Reasonable Use of Encouragement and Punishment in Primary and Middle School Ecation--theoretical models and practical countermeasures;
論中小學教育中獎勵與懲罰的合理使用——理論模型與實踐對策
10.
Chapter VII Rewards and Penalties
第七章 獎勵與處罰
11.
Consequently, enforcement policies are often designed to punish the most blatant violators and/or encourage voluntary compliance by the largest numbers of entities.
結果，執行政策就成了懲罰嚴重違法者或鼓勵公眾自覺遵守法規。
12.
But Rice told C television that Ru ia and China have signed on to the two paths a roach of incentives and punishment.
但是賴斯對美國有線電視新聞網說，俄羅斯和中國已經同意採取獎勵加懲罰的雙軌行動。
13.
Something, such as the fear of punishment or the expectation of reward, that inces action or motivates effort.
刺激；誘因；動機引起行動或激發努力的某事，比如對懲罰的恐懼或對獎勵的期望
14.
They don』t need to be slapped on the wrist when they fail. They do need to be rewarded, or at least acknowledged, when they succeed.
他們需要的不是在失敗時的象徵性懲罰，而是在成功時受到獎勵或至少得到認可。
15.
The Congress and others have to ask themselves whether it is possible to maintain an agreement without either sanctions or incentives.
國務諸公及其他人士務請自問：沒有獎勵，也無懲罰，一項協議如何能得以維持。
16.
Manager Incentive Mechanism: Internal Participation, External Market Punishment and Internal Governance Punishment;
經理人的激勵機制:內部分成激勵、外部市場懲罰與內部治理懲罰
17.
In nature there are no rewards or punishments; there are consequences.
自然界中?獎賞和懲罰，只有因果報應。
18.
The state or fact of deserving reward or punishment.
應得到獎賞或懲罰的狀態或事實. 參考 造句
❻ 獎勵永比懲罰好作文
將痛苦放大是對自己的一種懲罰。在挫折中將痛苦縮小未嘗不是對自己的一種獎勵。——題記
獎勵自己是多方面的。我們在得意時的自我激勵；我們在失意時的自我安慰。但當我們身陷於挫折之中時，該如何來獎勵自己？
唐代的李白曾幾何時面臨挫折。他沒有沉浸的痛苦中，而是出去遊山玩水。因此當上了浪漫詩仙；范仲淹也是一個很好的例子，如果他因被降職而一蹶不振，哪裡還有《岳陽樓記》的佳作；初唐四傑之一的王勃如果因挫折而倒下。怎麼還有流傳至今的「海內存知己，天涯若比鄰。「
他們將挫折縮到最小，才能成為空前的大文學家。可是如果沉迷在痛苦中，只會將痛苦無限放大，作出錯誤的選擇。
劉備是三國時期的君主。劉備的二弟在麥城敗走後，劉備意氣用事，竟發動全蜀的兵力去伐吳，但被火燒連營，失敗而歸。正因為這個錯誤，他興復漢室的大志與生前的努力全部付之東流。導致了「白帝城託孤」這一慘劇。
我們不能因為遇到了小的挫折就使自己的目標止步。要在挫折中學會反思，要在挫折中獎勵自己。要在挫折中學會反思，要在挫折中學會獎勵自己，才能使痛苦縮小。人生就是這樣「不如意十常八九，常與人言無二三。」
將痛苦放大是對自己的懲罰，在挫折中獎勵自己，將痛苦縮小，才能走出迷途，拋離絕望。
正因為這樣，才有李白釋懷的幸福；
正因為這樣，才有范仲淹豪邁的幸福；
正因為這樣，才有王勃豁達的幸福。
獎勵自己，就是使自己美好的人生錦上添花。
❼ 獎勵比懲罰的效果更好。這句話描述是否正確
這個要看情況.事事沒來絕對.獎勵和懲罰自沒有好不好 只是適不適合！
比如說 一群工人每天都很辛苦的幹活.飯都吃不飽.
而制度只有懲罰沒有獎勵 我相信效益會更加差. 如果說誰能夠完成工作.飯可以吃飽而且還有額外的肉吃.不用說也知道結果會怎麼樣了
❽ 預防和懲罰哪個更好的英語作文
懲罰~~~！！！！！因為好寫啊！！
❾ 寫一篇獎勵比批評更重要的英語作文
Everyone wants to be appreciated and praised by others for what they do and what they say. For instance children want to be praised by their parents. Students want to be praised by their teachers. Employees want to be praised by their employers. It seems that praise is like sunlight to us we can't flower and grow without it.
But it is a pity that while most of us are only too ready to blow the cold wind of harsh criticism on others we are somehow reluctant to give people around us the warm sunshine of praise. For example most mothers are always not satisfied with the progress their children made at school Most teachers always drown their students
compositions in critical red ink instead of commenting favorably on them. Most employersarealways criticalabout what their employees have done instead of giving encouragement to them. proces may be great. So let's be alert to the small excellence around us and comment on them. We will not only bring joy into other people's lives but also very often add happiness to our own.