⑴ 英語辯論賽 主持人說話中的術語
辯論賽 debate
辯手 debater
正方 positive side
反方 negative side
⑵ 英語辯論賽 正方一辯的開場白
各位同學、今晚的辯論賽即將開始.
有請隊員入場.
首先入場的是正方 *** ,他們的立場是 *** .他們的辯手是:……
現在入場的是反方 *** ,他們的立場是 *** .他們的辯手是:……
今天晚上,我們舉行的是:****辯論賽 ,歡迎各位辯手和同學們的到來，希望雙方在今晚的比賽中都有出色的表現。
讓我們用熱烈的掌聲請出今晚到場的評委,他們是:……
感謝各位評委的到來，今晚的辯題是「 .」我們有人說」 .」也有人說:」 .」誰是誰非呢.台下的同學想必早已經如飢似渴.再看台上的辯手,哈,也早已磨刀霍霍了.
1.好，我們進入比賽的第一部分，立論階段，看雙方如何擺開陣勢（介紹規則，時間）有請正方立論…….
恩，正方X辯真是激情滿懷，下面有請反方辯手進行立論……..
2.好，看來雙方戰略以定，接下來進入我們的盤問階段……..
3.雙方真可謂是兵來將擋，運籌帷幄，精彩的盤論過後，下面進入我們的駁論階段…….
4.看來雙方真是不分上下，寸不不讓啊。現在到了現場提問的時間了，大家要把握機會啊……..
5.感謝觀眾的提問，看來萬事具備，東風又來，該是短兵相接了，再進入我們最精彩的自由答辯吧…….
6.好一場精彩而又激烈的答辯，雙方各不示弱，氣勢逼人啊，那就趕快進入我們最後的總結陳辭階段吧，看雙方如何乘勝追擊，保住勝果，還是卧薪嘗膽，卷土重來，反敗為勝…….
7.好了，本場比賽也快結束了，誰勝誰負呢，評委自有公決，現在請評委退場
8.現在是觀眾提問時間，任何觀眾對任何辯手最多可以提一個問題，還不趕快行動……
9.好，觀眾提問就到這里。現在請xx老師為本場比賽點評
10. 結果出來了，誰勝誰負這個答案已在我的手上了，大家說誰獲勝了呢……看來大家還是唯我獨尊，沒有大公無私的精神啊。看來大家的團隊精神值得表揚。現在我宣布比賽結果，本次的優秀辯手是….獲勝的是…好本場比賽到此結束。請同學們細心留意我們的海報，不要錯過下場比賽哦
⑶ 英語口語辯論賽有用句型
你這個題目很寬泛。。有個英語辯論賽技巧的帖子，希望能對你有用 On Debating Clarity: Avoise of terms which can be interpreted differently by different readers.When we are talking to people who substantially agree with us we canuse such terms as "rednecks" or "liberals" and feel reasonably surethat we will be understood. But in a debate, we are talking to peoplewho substantially disagree with us and they are likely to put adifferent interpretation on such words. Evidence:Quoting an authority is not evidence. Quoting a majority opinion is notevidence. Any argument that starts with, "According to Einstein..." isnot based on objective evidence. Any argument that starts with, "Mostbiologists believe..." is not based on objective evidence. Saying, "TheBible says..." is not evidence. Authorities and majorities can be wrongand frequently have been. （歷屆辯論賽中出現最多的問題） Emotionalism: Avoidemotionally charged words--words that are likely to proce more heatthan light. Certainly the racial, ethnic, or religious hate words haveno place in rational debating. Likewise, avoid argumentum ad hominem.Personal attacks on your opponent are an admission of intellectualbankruptcy. Also, slurs directed at groups with whom your opponent isidentified are usually nonproctive. Try to keep attention centered onthe objective problem itself. There is a special problem when debatingsocial, psychological, political, or religious ideas because a person'stheories about these matters presumably have some effect on his ownlife style. In other words, rather than saying "and that's why you aresuch an undisciplined wreck" say, "a person adopting your position is,I believe, likely to become an undisciplined wreck because ..." Causality: Avoid the blunder of asserting a causal relationship with the popular fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hocwhich declares that because some event A happened and immediatelyafterward event B happened that event A was the cause of event B.(Iknew someone whose car stalled on the way to work. She would get outand open the hood and slam it and then the car would start. Singing asong would have been just as effective to allow time for a vapor lockto dissipate!) Also avoid the popular fallacy that correlation provescausation. People who own Cadillacs, on average, have higher incomesthan people who don't. This does not mean that if we provided peoplewith Cadillacs that they would have higher incomes. Innuendo(影射):Innuendois saying something pejorative about your opponent without coming rightout and saying it but by making more or less veiled allusions to somecircumstance, rumor, or popular belief. If you want to see someexcellent examples of innuendo, watch Rush Limbaugh. Politicians are,unfortunately, frequently guilty of using innuendo. It is an easy wayto capitalize on popular prejudices without having to make explicitstatements which might be difficult or impossible to defend againstrational attack. Besure of your facts. What is the source of your information? If it is anewspaper or a magazine, are you sure that the information hasn't been"slanted" to agree with that publication's political bias? Wherecrucial facts are concerned, it is best to check with more than onesource. Often international publications will give you a differentperspective than your hometown newspaper. Check to see whether the bookyou are using was published by a regular publishing company or whetherit was published by some special interest group like the John BirchSociety or a religious organization. These books cannot be trusted topresent unbiased evidence since their motivation for publishing is nottruth but rather the furtherance of some political or religious view. Understandyour opponents' arguments. It is good practice to argue with a friendand take a position with which you do not agree. In this way you maydiscover some of the assumptions your opponents are making which willhelp you in the debate. Remember that everybody thinks that hisposition is the right one, and everybody has his reasons for thinkingso. Do not impute ridiculous or malevolent ideas to your opponent. An example of this is the rhetorical statement, "Haveyou stopped beating your wife?" This imputes or presupposes that youropponent has beaten his wife. One frequently sees references byconservative speakers and writers to the idea that gay activists want"special privileges." This would be ridiculous if it were true. Itisn't true, but speaking as if it were true and well known to all isegregiously unfair to listeners or readers who may not be wellinformed. It is probably always wise to treat your opponent withrespect, even if he doesn't deserve it. If he doesn't deserve respect,this will probably soon become obvious enough. Regression to the mean(邏輯退化):Another source of error which occurs very frequently is the failure totake into account regression to the mean. This is a bit technical, butit is very important, especially in any kind of social or psychologicalresearch which depends upon statistical surveys or even experimentswhich involve statistical sampling. Rather than a general statement ofthe principle (which becomes more and more unintelligible as thestatement becomes more and more rigorous) an example will be used. Let's consider intelligence testing. 1.Perhaps we have a drug that is supposed to raise the IQ of mentallyretarded kids. So we give a thousand intelligence tests and select the30 lowest scoring indivials. 2. We then give these low scoring kids our drug and test them again. 3. We find that there has been an increase in the average of their IQ scores. 4. Is this evidence that the drug increased the IQ? Notnecessarily! Suppose we want to show that smoking marijuana lowers theIQ. Well, we take the 30 highest scoring kids in our sample and givethem THC and test them again. We find a lower average IQ. Is this evidence that marijuana lowers the IQ? Notnecessarily! Any statistician knows that if you make some kind of ameasurement of some attribute of a large sample of people and thenselect the highest and lowest scoring indivials and make the samemeasurement again, the high scoring group will have a lower averagescore and the low scoring group will have a higher average score thanthey did the first time. This is called "regression to the mean" and itis a perfectly universal statistical principle. Thereare undoubtedly more points to be made here. Suggestions will begratefully received. Larry has made the following suggestions: · Apply the scientific method. （運用科學方法） · Cite relevant personal experience. （合理引用相關的個人經歷） · Be polite. （辯論過程中有禮待人） · Organize your response. (Beginning, middle, end.) （對你辯詞進行合理的組織） · Treat people as indivials. · Cite sources for statistics and studies used. · Literacy works. Break posts into sentences and paragraphs. · Read the post you are responding to. Stay open to learning
⑷ 英語主持人辯論賽常用台詞
一辯，二辯
Debater Number 1
Debater Number 2
評委團：judges
題目 Debating Competition
開頭：welcome to the debating competition of the issue "題目" we have 6 debaters today, 3 on each side, and they are"名字」
now lets begin.開始 Good morning/afternoon/evening ladies and gentleman(or students),contestants and adjudicators(裁判).Today we are debating the topic (報一下辯論題目) On the affirmative side we have (報一下正方參賽者的順序),and on the negative side we have (反方參賽者的順序).
Both teams have showed great debating ability in today's fierce competition. Let us now await for the adjudicator's scoring. I am sure it is going to be very close.And I think all contestants need to be congratulated for their outstanding efforts.
The score is in, and the winner of today's debate is (報贏的一方)
Than you all for coming.
⑸ 求英語辯論賽主持人發言稿。
start:
today we are talking about happiness.
To some, happiness is being surrounded by family and friends. to others, happiness means achieving success in something, such as meeting a goal. to those who have been injured or struggle with a physical disability, happiness can simply mean a day without pain or just being alive.
well, let's see what our students are thinking of happiness.
yes, as we can be happiness cannot leave a sufficient money support, however, are people only motivated by money?
now let's move on to the - free talk part
last bit - conclusion part , let's see if any of them can give a strong support for their topic
⑹ 英語辯論賽主持人台詞
一辯，二辯
Debater Number 1
Debater Number 2
評委團：judges
題目回 Debating Competition
開頭：welcome to the debating competition of the issue "題目" we have 6 debaters today, 3 on each side, and they are"名字」
now lets begin.開始答
⑺ 英語辯論賽的開場白和結束語
賽制是自什麼?你們打的什麼位置?開場白...先問好...然後可以說Today, I'm here, proudly pro/against the motion which is... 正一的話可以先解釋一下立這個motion的理由（如果是議會制辯論）或者做出界定，除了正一，大部分陳述應該包括rebuttal part和constructive part.正/反方最後一個人還可以對這場辯論做一個summary,總結一下本場中雙方的clash或者是比較一下雙方的打點,並根據自己總結的各點闡明本方對主要的clash做出了哪些貢獻提供了什麼樣的理論依據,而對方怎麼樣沒能對他們的論點提出論據或者論據如何不足以證實他方觀點...開場白可以先說明自己的提綱,比如my speech today consists of * parts, 1st rebuttal, then constructive,(根據自己的內容角色做出調整),然後結束的話把自己的主要觀點及闡釋部分各用一句話再做回顧,說明自己觀點.最後一個人還可以上升一下高度,結尾用點小煽情的^^~
希望能幫到你~~~
⑻ 英語辯論賽中主持人應該說些什麼
這個網址給你，是抄中文的辯襲論賽主持詞，你可以參考一下
http://www.flgw.cn/yanjiang/zhuchi/200602/30679.html
中文怎麼說，英文也怎麼說，你可以先想一下，主持中文的比賽要說什麼，然後再翻譯成英語
welcome
to
English
Debating
Competiton
etc
⑼ 英語辯論賽"以貌取人"的主持人稿
judge people with their appearance