⑴ 「論文答辯」，「答辯論文」英語怎麼說
the oral defense for a thesis
the defensed thesis
⑵ 英語畢業論文答辯的開場白和自述，還有可能提的問題！！！求高人指導~~
Good afternoon, professors and everyone. i am ... from ... and my supervisor is professor .... under his encouragement and guidance, i have finished my paper, the title of which is "...".
i choose this topic because, first,"...",second,"...". i hope ...
now i would like to introce my paper briefly. this is the outline....
....我上個月剛答辯過了，這個簡潔些就好啦，重點是論文寫的好不好，你對自己的論專文熟悉程度。
問題的話，（我屬是寫翻譯的）我那時老師主要問了我是怎樣運用理論去分析的，我就當場舉了個例子分析了一下。
⑶ 英語專業畢業論文答辯開場白和結束語
其實英語專業的論文抄答辯也沒什麼特定的開場白和結束語哦。我們答辯的時候，上去就是自己對論文的陳述，也就是內容摘要部分。完了你就說THAT'S ALL,THANK YOU就行啦。然後老師就開始對你進行提問。
⑷ 英語專業畢業論文答辯怎麼來陳述才最好力求表現最好！謝謝！！！
畢業論文答辯的准備和技巧
畢業論文答辯是畢業論文教學活動的最後一個環節。是對已完成的論文的最後審核（論文的真偽和優劣）與檢驗（學生對研究問題所掌握的深度與廣度）;是對學生研究問題的水平和能力的綜合考核，學生將要自主地以自述加答問的方式展示成果、闡述觀點，應對質疑。
一、答辯前的准備
首先要做好心理准備。要克服怯場心理，消除緊張情緒，保持良好的心理狀態。要有自信意識。這是學生應具備的最基本的一種心理素質。凡是有充分自信意識的學生，在答辯過程中就會精神煥發、心緒鎮靜、神態自若、思維敏捷、記憶完整。答辨就可以淋漓盡致地發揮。要做到自信，需要對自己的論文從內容、范圍、材料有充分的理解和多方面的准備，做到爛熟於心。從整體到局部都有瞭然於胸的感受，這樣就能對提出的種種質疑，應付自如，即使不能對答如流，至少也能迎刃而解，問有所答。真正做到「藝高膽大」，有了真才實學，就不怕別人提出質詢。
其次要做好資料的准備。不要忘記將與論文有關的一些圖表類資料整理好。如經濟類論文答辯時，可能會涉及許多統計表、統計圖、測算表、明細表、演示圖等。准備許多相關的圖表，懸掛在答辯現場，供作講解之輔助工具。
最後要做好發言提綱的准備。「工欲善其事，必先利其器」不打無准備之仗，答辯者在答辯前可從以下角度去考慮准備答辯：
1、自己為什麼選擇這個課題？
2、研究這個課題的意義和目的是什麼？
3、全文的基本框架、基本結構是如何安排的？
4、全文的各部分之間邏輯關系如何？
5、在研究本課題的過程中，發現了那些不同見解？對這些不同的意見，自己是怎樣逐步認識的？又是如何處理的？
6、論文雖未論及，但與其較密切相關的問題還有哪些？
7、還有哪些問題自己還沒有搞清楚，在論文中論述得不夠透徹？
8、寫作論文時立論的主要依據是什麼？
對以上問題應仔細想一想，必要時要用筆記整理出來，寫成發言提綱，在答辯時用。
二、答辯技巧
學生首先要介紹一下論文的概要，這就是所謂「自述報告」，須強調一點的是「自述」而不是「自讀」。這里重要的技巧是必須注意不能照本宣讀，把報告變成了「讀書」。「照本宣讀」是第一大忌。這一部分的內容可包括寫作動機、緣由、研究方向、選題比較、研究范圍、圍繞這一論題的最新研究成果、自己在論文中的新見解、新的理解或新的突破。做到概括簡要，言簡意賅。不能佔用過多時間，一般以十分鍾為限。所謂「削繁去冗留清被，畫到無時是熟時」，就是說，盡量做到詞約旨豐，一語中的。要突出重點，把自己的最大收獲、最深體會、最精華與最富特色的部分表述出來。這里要注意一忌主題不明；二忌內容空泛，東拉西扯；三忌平平淡淡，沒有重點。
在答辯時，學生要注意儀態與風度，這是進入人們感受渠道的第一信號。如果答辯者能在最初的兩分種內以良好的儀態和風度體現出良好的形象，就有了一個良好的開端。有人將人的體態分解為最小單位來研究（如頭、肩、胸、脊、腰等）認為凹胸顯現怯懦、自卑，挺胸顯示情緒高昂—但過分則為傲慢自負；肩手頸正顯示正直、剛強，脊背挺拔體現嚴肅而充滿自信。但過於如此，就會被人看作拘泥刻板保守，略為彎腰有度，稍稍欠身可表示謙虛禮貌。孫中山先生曾說過「其所具風度姿態，即使全場有肅然起敬之心，舉動格式又須使聽者有安靜詳和之氣」他的這番金玉良言，對我們確實有很大的啟發。
在聽取教師提問時所要掌握的技巧要領是：
沉著冷靜，邊聽邊記
精神集中，認真思考
既要自信，又要虛心
實事求是，絕不勉強
聽准聽清，聽懂聽明
在回答問題時所要掌握的技巧是構思時要求每個問題所要答的「中心」「症結」「關健」在哪裡？從哪一個角度去回答問題最好？應舉什麼例子來證明？回答問題的內容實質上是一段有組織的「口頭作文」。這就要一、文章應有論點、論據。
二、有開頭主體與結尾。
三、有條理、有層次。
四、應用詞確當，語言流暢。
五、應口齒清楚、語速適度。開頭要簡潔：單刀直入，是最好的開頭，開門見山地表述觀點，在答辯中是最好的辦法。主體部份的表述可條分縷析，即把所要回答的內容逐條歸納分析，實際上是對自己掌握的材料由此及彼，由表及裡地做整理。這樣的表述就不會流於表面，而能深入本質。條分縷析可以把自己掌握的一些實際例子合並，整理成若干條目，列成幾個小標題：分成幾點，一點一點，一條一條地說出。滿碗的飯必須一口一口吃，滿肚子的道理也必須一條一條講出來，環環相扣，條條相連，令人聽完後有清楚的印象。假如在准備的時候已經准備了一個較完整的提綱，那麼沿著回答問題的主線，再穿上一些玉珠（舉例子）就可以做到中心明確，條理清楚，有理有例了。
⑸ 英語畢業論文答辯過程謝謝。。。
我恰好也是英語專業的，已完成答辯。
首先你要做5分鍾左右的presentation，那部分內容包含1 : why you choose this topic ;2:what is the main content of your thesis: 3:What is the problem still in your paper (也即是你論文中你覺得哪些需要後來的學者繼續研究或者也可從你論文不足的地方講幾句）。
其次你開始回答問題，通常是3或4個問題。這部分你准備時，1. 一定要將自己論文中的各個標題記熟。很多老師就針對其問問題。2.你文中所用的術語，其definition要能說出。 3.如果你在上部分presentation未說明你為什麼選擇這個論題時。老師也可能對此提出問題。4.也有可能詢問你撰寫的論文對語言學習有什麼幫助。
嘿嘿 ，個人看法。你的格式最好要少些瑕疵，有些老師就專挑格式錯誤，他們認為這能反映你的態度是否端正。還有答辯老師未必有那麼多時間看。而這個錯誤最為明顯。
提前將abstract和conclusion背一背。答辯時態度謙遜些。自信些，老師都不大會為難我們。祝你好運。
⑹ 口語不好，英語論文答辯需不需要把論文背下來
不用，你需要把你整個論文的思路用英文順下來，預見幾個問題然後把答案捋一捋能用英文表達清楚意思即可……
⑺ 英語畢業論文答辯的陳述詞應該怎麼說，最好有個模式
Teachers, good afternoon! My name is Chen Jing, the students of class * * * *, my thesis topic is《 the power of the giver and the victim, foucault power interpretation theory perspective, the heroine in 「the golden notebook, Anna》，thesis is completed under Wang Zhiqin teacher of meticulous guidance, here, I express my deep appreciation to my supervisor, to the teachers to take part in my thesis express our heartfelt thanks to you for, and for the past three years I have a chance to listen to the teachings, teachers say heartfelt tribute.Below I will this paper design the research background, significance and main content of the teacher made a report, please the teacher criticism guidance.
First of all, I want to talk about the research background and significance of the graation thesis design.
Since the Golden Notebook involves comprehensive themes such as colonialism,feminism,racism,communism etc. and e to its severely fragmented writing forms,it has intrigued groups of both domestic and overseas critics. The research abroad could be roughly divided into three stages. The first comes about the biography of the author」],the general introction and reading background of this novel,then a number of explorations over the themes of this book have been concted, from the most popular one feminism,psychological featuresto the philosophical elements^. Finally, critics shifted their concentration to the unique form or style applied by Lessing,for instance they analyzed the varied narrative techniques employed within ,the aesthetic value it displayed ,as well as its artistic nature generated by its messy forms.And it is worth mentioning that in 2006 Tapan K.Ghosh has composed a specific collection of reviews on the Golden Notebook.While the study over this novel in foreign country has been quite fruitful and mature, the research in China is far lagging behind, most of them just emphasized the novel's multiplethemes such as feminism,eco-economic,psychology and modemism Thus more angels should be discovered by scholars at home, such as colonialism, religious and psychological exploration, and their research method should be more diversified,for instance,the potential inter-disciplinary study of this novel are waiting to be excavated, and seldomhave critics compared this masterpiece with other similar text.
Based on Foucault's power theory, this thesis is going to explore how the female protagonist Anna in Doris Lessing's the Golden Notebook, the procer and victim of power,fought against her catastrophic life. Through a close reading of the text, this thesis aims at making a Foucanldian interpretation on Lessing's motivation behind portraying such a schizophrenic female personality, convincing the reader that power permeates every capillary of the society mainly by exerting influence on power relations between indivial. Sinceeverything concerns with the functioning of power, be it tragedy or comedy, Anna's destiny cannot be an exception, instead of restraining from the one-way suppress from men,Foucault's power theory enables us to put the heroine into a larger, more diverse cultural or social background where indivial's identity could be perceived with much more plurality or heterogeneity. Ultimately, given Anna's gender attributes, the application of Foucault's power theory to the analysis of heroine can shed light on how women could wittedly deal with their counterpart, strike a balance between freedom and restriction, and thus heading feminism into a more reasonable and rational direction.
Secondly, I want to talk about the structure and main contents of this paper.
The author is going to divide this thesis into five chapters. The first chapter is a briefing about the research background of the Golden Notebook, which provides an overview on the fragmented content and complicated structure of this masterpiece. The second chapter is an introction of the research status of this novel at home and abroad, at the same time,Foucault's power theory will be elaborated here as the theoretical framework. Chapter three concentrates on the text analysis of the female protagonist Anna's pursuit of the free woman identity, which will be concted mainly from three perspectives, namely her political faith,marriage and love, as well we psychological status. Through asserting Foucault's power theory into the text analysis, we could get a clear view on how the heroine became the victim of the omnipresent power in contemporary social organizations, and also how indivial resisted power via making explorations on the genealogy of the self. Chapter four gives two different interpretations of Anna's destiny, with each representing the common feminists'view and Foucault's version respectively. Via such comparison, the author attempts to find a correlation between Foucault's power theory and feminism, to tell in what ways Foucault'spower theory have modified parts of problems in current feminism, and how the formal convergent with the latter. The last chapter serves as a concluding part in which a summary of this thesis will be reached, and limitations as well as further implications will be point out.
Finally, I want to talk about the deficiency existing in this paper.
The limitations of this thesis cannot be regarded as the challenge to the relevance of Foucaxxlt's theory to feminism; on the contrary, it tells that the value of applying Foucault'spower theory lies precisely in his invitation to feminists to remain highly critical about their previous prejudices as well as their future trends. In order to make full use of Foucault's power theory in modifying feminism, we have to dig out more convergences they share with each other. With the idea that knowledge and truth are partial ones serving as a start,Genealogy is then an excellent perspective for farther explorations on the Foucauldian and feminist projects.
Thank you very much!
⑻ 論文答辯用英文怎麼說啊
(Ph D) oral defence
viva (voce) (口語)
⑼ 論文ppt答辯，開場白怎麼說，英文的，
Good morning,
Distinguished professors and teachers, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for attending the oral defense. (或Welcome to attend the oral defense.) ：
I am XX. First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, professorXX, for his intellectual guidance, invaluable instructions and comments on my thesis. It is with his valuable assistance that I have finally accomplished this thesis.
My topic is On the tragedy figures at historical turning points（Comparison of KongYiji and Rip Van ）The whole thesis consists of 6 parts. The first part will give a brief introction of the negative, evasive and conservative attitudes of Kong and Rip as well as the topic』 significance in the real society. And the second part is going to analyze the figures』 background to show the historical necessity of the tragedies. In the third part, the tragic heroes』 failing in the character according to their living environment will be further discussed and the fourth part is to talk about their different tendency of dispositions and behaviors in the society. Then the author will dig into the root causes of the tragedies in the fifth part, and sum up the whole paper to reveal the ideological weak points of the two countries separately in the last part.
Thank you!