1. 考研英語閱讀怎麼復習,現在明白還不晚
1.難詞,難句的梳理
所謂的難詞難句對於不同的學生來講,內容將是不同的。但所指的就是在前期做的過程中影響到閱讀,影響到理解,和影響到題目正確率的所有的字詞句。尤其是高頻的,常考的詞與重點語法結構,以及題目過程中自己做錯的原因。
2.題目的梳理
在所有的題目中,按照題型分類,主旨題,例證題,推斷題,詞彙題,觀點態度題分別有著怎樣的解題思路和注意事項。
比如:選項當中有一種錯誤選項的典型特點是:比較結構的出現。每當碰到的時候要多加小心,因為通常情況下原文並沒有涉及到兩者之間的比較,但是選項卻出現了,並且這種考察方式是及其不容易察覺的,所以要多加小心。但是任何說法都不會是絕對的,關鍵得看原文細節到底有無涉及。
對於那些閱讀理解一直穩定在每篇錯兩到三個題目的同學
想要突破,想要提高,每天只是機械的重復做題並沒有什麼用,重要的是要分析做錯的每一道題,找到自己出錯的根本原因。
首先歸納下,你什麼類型的題目總做錯,做錯的原因是什麼?是分不清題型、不知道如何定位?還是定位句子看不明白?或者是定位句子看得懂,可是和四個選項比對時建立不起來和正確選項之間的邏輯關聯,看不出來定位句子和選項之間的必然聯系?
只有知道具體問題出在哪,才能更接近解決問題的本質,才能提高,分析出自己的問題。那麼就有針對性的練習,提高自己薄弱的環節,哪個環節薄弱就練哪裡。其實,更多的考生是出在最後一個環節,就是定位句子和正確選項之間聯系不起來,往往四個選項排除兩個,剩下兩個糾結的,然後就選錯了,那麼現在教你一招:拿出真題,別的不幹,就分析定位句子和正確選項之間的關聯,再分析下讓你特別糾結的那個選項到底為什麼不對,錯在哪裡,如何干擾你的,認真分析之後一定有提高!
對那些覺得閱讀真題都記得答案的同學。
有同學說,真題都看了好幾遍了,每道題的答案都知道是哪一個,也知道在文章中的定位在哪裡,不知道再看還要看什麼。
當你第一遍做真題時,你的側重點往往在於對文章內容和句子意思的理解,做題時也往往是一道題做完基本所對應的那一段都看差不多了,也就是說基本是按照自己的傳統方法做的,這樣一篇文章坐下來應該不止18分鍾吧?
但是第二遍做真題,因為有了第一遍對於文章內容的了解,你的重心就應該有所改變,重點應該放在後面的五道題目上來,認真分析每道題目類型,然後按照題目類型和題干關鍵詞看看,不用像第一遍做題時看那麼多句話,只找到一到兩句精準的定位句子就把題目解出來。
做第三遍的時候,再站在一個更宏觀的角度觀察下,每道題目所涉及到的定位句子在每個段落裡面的什麼位置,有什麼特點,比如位於段首、段尾、還是長難句?再看看,每篇文章的主旨句和每道題正確選項之間有什麼聯系?其實就是找找規律,摸索出點兒門道,比如揣摩下命題人一般把考點設置在哪個位置等等。只有這樣一層層的剝洋蔥似的看閱讀真題,才能避免只見樹木不見森林盲目式的閱讀,才能快速提高閱讀部分的成績。
2. 考研英語閱讀理解80篇是不是比真題難度大些
您好,我覺得難易因人而異。加油迎向158教育在線知道提問
3. 考研英語閱讀理解一般平均幾分鍾一篇啊
考研英語一共3個小時,閱讀4篇單選的那種,平均一篇18-20分鍾左右。 不過閱讀佔分比挺高的,可以把其他的做快點,閱讀多留點時間。
希望對你有幫助
4. 考研英語#閱讀理解有多變態
關於考研英語你首先需要了解的是考研英語分為英語一和英語二,英語一的閱讀理內解確實很變態,不過英語二的閱容讀理解還是容易很多,算不上變態。英語一的閱讀理解大多數人剛開始刷的時候都是看自己對了幾個,因為幾乎就只會對幾個。而英語本身不好的有可能在閱讀中全軍覆沒,不過也不用太著急,通過准備練習,後期還是都會有所提升的,只要肯花時間。
對於考研英語,經過大部分人總結的經驗就是刷真題,一遍一遍的刷,把真題中的每個生詞,每個長難句都搞懂,你就不會覺得閱讀理解變態了。不過剛開始可能會覺得有點費時,但是一定要堅持,因為這是最有效的方法。
5. 考研英語閱讀理解答題技巧。
第一步:快速劃出段落序號以及各段首句。
第二步:閱讀首段,了解文章主題(Theme)。
宏觀把握,隨機應變,根據第一段內容,才能更好的給定位打下基礎。
第三步:掃描題干,盡量找出題干能夠提供的信息(Key Words)1分鍾
定位詞的優先考慮順序:
1、首先標出明確告訴位置的題目所在(某段某行)。
2、專有名詞優先,包括人名、地名、書名以及帶引號的詞等 。
3、數字、時間、時段(包括某些介詞短語)。
4、較長、較復雜的片語(名詞動詞片語優先) 。
5、重要的動詞、形容詞或副詞等實詞 。
6、條件詞、因果詞、比較詞等虛詞(往往起到輔助作用) 。
第四步:變速瀏覽原文,抓住中心。
注意把握三個閱讀原則:
原則一:首段原則(文章的第一段逐字讀明白,可以反復和回讀)。
原則二:首末句原則(其餘各段的首尾句要細讀,其他各句正常閱讀即可)。
原則三:「路標」原則。所謂路標詞,就是表示作者思想銜接和轉折的功能詞彙。
第五步:仔細審題,定位原文。
原則一:關鍵詞定位原則 。
原則二:自然段定位原則 。
原則三:長難句定位原則。
注意一:關鍵詞在原文可能是原詞本身,也可能是關鍵詞的同義詞。
注意二:問原因的問題,一般問主要原因(major reason)。
注意三:「邪惡的眼睛」(in the eyes of),注意問的是誰的觀點和態度。
6. 考研英語真題:閱讀理解
考研英語真題:閱讀理解
Text 1
A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK "town of culture" award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in E220m of investment and an avalache of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain' town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.
Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for, the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow- village of culture ? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?
It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run "year of culture" washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community . The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.
It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organizations. But it can be done : Glasgow' s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.
A "town of culture" could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town's
peculiarities-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.
21. Cooper and her colleagues argue that a "town of culture" award could________
[A] consolidate the town-city ties in Britain.
[B] promote cooperation among Britain's towns.
[C] increase the economic strength of Britain's towns.
[D] focus Britain's limited resources on cultural events.
22. According to Paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as________
[A] a sensible compromise.
[B] a self-deceiving attempt.
[C] an eye-catching bonus.
[D] an inaccessible target.
23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it________
[A] endeavours to maintain its image.
[B] meets the aspirations of its people.
[C] brings its local arts to prominence.
D] commits to its long-term growth.
24. Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present________
[A] a contrasting case.
[B] a supporting example.
[C] a background story,
[D] a related topic.
25. What is the author's attitude towards the proposal ?
[A] Skeptical
[B] Objective
[C] Favourable
[D] Critical
Text 2
Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money. Scientists need joumals in which to publish
their research, so they will supply the articles without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free, because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the proction of scientific knowledge.
With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only fnd a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very price sensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing instry is in an existential crisis.
The Dutch giant Elsevier, which claims to publish 25% of the scientific papers proced in the world,made profits of more than £900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than £210m in 2016 toenable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.
The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012, which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accessed, shows the legal ecosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.
In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms: either freely available from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.
Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities. Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their proct free to readers by charging their writers fees to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around £500 to $5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these’’article preparation costs’’ had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation. In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status, while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places. In both cases, we need a rebalancing of power.
26. Scientific publishing is seen as“a licence to print money" partly because________
[A] its funding has enjoyed a steady increase .
[B] its marketing strategy has been successful.
[C] its payment for peer review is reced.
[D] its content acquisition costs nothing.
27. According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have________
[A] thrived mainly on university libraries.
[B] gone through an existential crisis.
[C] revived the publishing instry.
[D] financed researchers generously.
28. How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?
[A] Relieved.
[B] Puzzled.
[C] Concerned
[D] Encouraged.
29. It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms________
[A]allow publishers some room to make money.
[B] render publishing much easier for scientists.
[C] rece the cost of publication substantially.
[D] free universities from financial burdens.
30. Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?
[A] Trial subscription is offered.
[B] Labour triumphs over status.
[C] Costs are well controlled.
D] The few feed on the many.
Text 3
Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.
A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.
Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.
The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.
The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".
But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?
The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.
Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.
Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.
Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.
31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________
[A] help little to rece gender bias.
[B] pose a threat to the state government.
[C] raise women's position in politics.
[D] greatly broaden career options.
32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?
[A] It has irritated private business owners.
[B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,
[C] It may go against the Constitution.
[D] It will settle the prior controversies.
33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____
[A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.
[B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.
[C] the pressure on women in global corporations.
[D] the needlessness of government interventions.
34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____
[A] the underestimation of elite women's role.
[B] the objection to female participation on boards.
[C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.
[D] the growing tension between labor and management.
35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?
[A] Women's need in employment should be considered.
[B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.
[C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.
[D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.
Text 4
Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax
on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France. Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such servces. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a“GAFA tax," meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multiational tech companies based in the United States.
The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measure, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.
The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital services tax is part of a much larger trend, with countries over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britain's DPT (diverted profits tax), Australia's MAAL (multinational antiavoidance law), and India's SEP (significant economic presence) test, to name but a few. At the same time, the European Union, Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated digital services taxes.
These unilateral developments differ in their specifics, but they are all designed to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep ;up with the current economy.
In response to these many unilateral measures, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currently working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020 on an international solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization' s work, but France's digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system.
France‘s planned tax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companies will face a cascade of different taxes from dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.
36. The French Senate has passed a bill to_____
[A] regulate digital services platforms.
[B] protect French companies' interests .
[C] impose a levy on tech multinationals.
[D] curb the influence of advertising.
37. It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax _____
[A] may trigger countermeasures against France.
[B] is apt to arouse criticism at home and abroad.
[C] aims to ease international trade tensions.
[D] will prompt the tech giants to quit France.
38. The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that _____
[A] redistribution of tech giants' revenue must be ensured.
[B] the current international tax system needs upgrading.
[C] tech multinationals' monopoly should be prevented.
[D] all countries ought to enjoy equal taxing rights.
39. It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO's current work_____
[A] is being resisted by US companies.
[B] needs to be readjusted immediately.
[C] is faced with uncertain prospects.
[D] needs to in involve more countries.
40. Which of the following might be the. best title for this text?
[A] France Is Confronted with Trade Sanctions
[B] France leads the charge on Digital Tax
[C] France Says "NO" to Tech Multinationals
[D] France Demands a Role in the Digital Economy
考研英語真題:閱讀理解的內容小編就說到這里了,更多關於考研備考技巧,報名入口,報名時間,考研成績查詢,報名費用,准考證列印入口及時間等問題,小編會及時更新。希望各位考生都能進入自己的理想考研院校。希望大家能好好復習。取得佳績。
7. 怎麼提高考研英語閱讀理解正確率
語課作為一門非常重要的基礎課,從著手開始准備考研到正式考前一個半月的這段准備時間里,應重點復習,投入的時間要佔平時復習時間的三分之一。英語的提高是個日積月累,厚積薄發的過程,也是逆水行舟、不進則退的過程。你可以花一個月時間突擊政治。但絕不敢自恃英語基礎不錯,放鬆英語的學習。提高英語成績的捷徑,我認為是多做閱讀題:一是閱讀理解的分值太高了,決定著考研的成敗、考生的命運,無法不重視。二是閱讀理解在鞏固詞彙,培養語感,提高英語水平方面有不可替代作用。那麼究竟如何提高呢?建議如下:
一、資料的選擇
首先,歷年考試真題是必備的資料,真題是一個標准,做真題可以把握試題難度,出題角度,了解命題重點。其次,考研閱讀輔導書,這種資料貴精不在多。另外,比較權威的考研機構有配合授課的課後練習,模擬沖刺,這種書也是不錯的。
資料的選擇上要把握難易程度。如果太難,文章中有很多單詞不認識、有很多句子不理解、問題又偏又怪、做下來錯的一塌糊塗,只會打擊你的信心,浪費你的時間,也不會有很大收效。比英語真題簡單也行不通,所以我建議大家選擇比真題難度稍高的資料。研究生的閱讀試題題材廣泛,涉及到包括政治、經濟、文化、科技、軍事、科普,教育等在內的方方面面;所選體裁多樣,包括記敘文、議論文、說明文、新聞文體等;文章內容時新,具有可讀性,一般很少有考生讀過的文章出現,所以選擇的輔導書覆蓋面要廣,內容要跟得上時代變化。在你選擇時,要考慮書籍的作者、出版社、書的質量,難易程度及參考他人對該書的評價。買書前,不妨借同學的書看一下或到書店詳細閱讀該書的介紹,做一兩篇閱讀把握難易程度,選項設置等。有些出版商只為牟利不負責任出書,書的內容東拼西湊,答案分析牽強附會或者乾脆沒有,甚至連答案都是錯誤的,這種書百害而無一利。
二、閱讀能力的提高
閱讀能力的測試包括閱讀速度,理解程度以及記憶能力等。要想獲得滿意的考研英語成績,最根本的方法就是提高詞彙量,加強閱讀訓練,同時熟悉一些閱讀技巧和做題方法也是至關重要的。每個人都有自己習慣的做題方法,不能說哪種方法更高明,要大家紛紛仿效。我比較贊同的一種方法是先快速瀏覽問題,然後帶著問題通讀全文,了解文章的大概內容,這一遍要快,不理解的地方跳過,然後做題。這時我們心中已大概知道答案的分布,跳過無關部分,快速找到答案所在處,仔細閱讀,反復推敲,直到選出正確答案。可以用直接法和排除法相結合選擇答案,排除法是四個選項都看,逐一排除選項,選出正確答案。這種方法可提高正確率,但花費的時間較長。
做閱讀題,要避免以下幾點:
第一,不忠於原文,主觀選擇答案。尤其對比較熟悉的題材或有個人習慣看法的問題往往容易以自己的主觀看法代替作者的觀點。閱讀理解的各選項間干擾性很大,許多答案都有其合理的一面,但不是作者在文中要表達的觀點,不是最確切的答案。所以我們必須仔細推敲,將原文的真正含義理解透徹,用原文要表達的意思對照四個選項,選出最切合原文句意的答案。如果對原文中心思想把握的不到位,跟著感覺走,想當然的選擇答案,就會被錯誤選項蒙蔽。對某一題材的熟悉有助於理解文章的內容,但也會出現誤導答案的選擇。
第二,問題簡單化,粗心以及一些不良的閱讀習慣。研究生的閱讀題比六級要難一些,一般情況下文章的中心思想比較隱含,不會放在每段的第一句,答案不會在文章中直接給出。所以我們通過閱讀,除了理解文章的字面意思外,更要對一些沒有被文字表達出來的信息,通過作者的觀點,自己已有的經驗,知識做出合乎邏輯的推斷。做題時要注意文章中的一些關鍵詞,這些關鍵詞在理解作者的態度和選擇答案方面有非常重要的作用。這些關鍵詞包括一些重要信息的轉折詞,如but,yet,although,however等,這可以讓我們了解到作者要轉換話題或否定已述內容。表示舉例的有such as,for instanse。表示目的的有to this end ,for this purpose,with this object。另一些詞如as a result,finally,in conclusion則表示作者對自己所述的事情要做一概括並准備結束所談及的問題。一些同學做題注意力不集中,做題速度慢,還有做閱讀題讀出聲,一字一字讀,碰到不懂的單詞查詞典的習慣,這是很不好的。考研時間是非常緊的,要在有限時間內做完所有題就需要平時多鍛煉。平時做題在保證正確率的前提下要注意提高閱讀速度。閱讀時碰到不認識的單詞可以通過構詞法,根據上下文意思或該詞的同位語推測,不要經常查詞典,做閱讀題是培養語感,鞏固詞彙的過程,不是積累詞彙的過程。做題查詞典一是浪費時間,不利提高閱讀能力,二這也不是背單詞的好辦法。由於閱讀題材廣泛,體裁多樣,所以在平時的訓練中要廣泛閱讀,盡可能地接觸各種文章,不要受自己興趣愛好影響,對那些自己平時不感興趣或覺得較難的文章更應該多訓練,為考試做准備。考研有很多句子偏長,修飾語多,分隔現象嚴重,詞義隱晦令人費解。分隔現象增多破壞句子連貫性,修飾成分多則造成理解困難,降低閱讀速度。這種長句平時也要多多鍛煉的。可以先弄清句子的基本成分,再弄清句子中的各修飾成分在句中作用以及各成分間的相互關系,然後根據上下文理解句子意思。考試時是沒有時間這樣一二三去分析的,平時這樣鍛煉可培養習慣思維,考試時速度自然而然就快了
第三,做完題缺少檢查。對感覺把握不大或較難的試題,尤其是概括歸納題,作者意圖題等在做完後要根據全文和問題的答案,看是否有矛盾,是否符合邏輯。一些細節題,推測題,判斷題要在文章相關段落中找到根據,以做到確保無誤。在平時的訓練中,要總結適合自己的方法,發現缺點及時糾正並在下次做題中避免發生類似錯誤。
足夠數量的詞彙和嫻熟的語法知識是提高閱讀理解能力和增強閱讀速度的基礎,閱讀理解的技巧和方法有助於提高答案正確率及答題速度。這段時間要合理安排時間,掌握大量詞彙,熟悉一些語法知識,培養語感。
8. 考研英語一篇閱讀理解該做幾分鍾內
根據我們寢室考研狗和考研機構輔導老師總結的經驗:
無論是英語一還是英語二,都應該保持在17min以內.
在做閱讀時,應該先看題目再閱讀,找到題目對應的句子,這樣是效率最高的。
9. 最近做考研英語閱讀理解題總是在一些小的細節題上扣分,愁死人不,哎……這種總是考查細節的閱讀理解太坑
考研英語閱讀理解細節題減少扣分的辦法:
一、了解細節題的命題模式
題干中常見的提示詞有:which,what,why,who,how,how many, cause,
because, result, true, not true, mention, not mention等。
二、清楚解題核心技巧
1、定位:根據題乾的定位詞迴文定位,尋找線索句。題目順序與文章順序基本一致,視情況靈活處理。
常見的定位特徵有以下幾類:
①對研究行為進行描述:
study,research,survey,findings,grope,assumption,hypothesis
目的:aim,purpose,target,for,to
方法:way,means,approach,by,in
發現:discover,findings,show,found,analysis,cause,because,
application
②專有名詞出現的地方:UN,Dr.
③年代、時間、數字
④特殊符號出現的地方:冒號,破折號,引號,分號,括弧
⑤信號詞出現的地方
轉折:however,but,nevertheless,though,even though,on the
contrary,instead,important,above all,again,as well,especially
原因:because,attribute A to B,if,when
⑥特殊語法出現的地方:定語從句,同位語從句,分詞做狀語,虛擬語氣
2、替換:將四個選項與線索句一一比對,表達方式不同意思最為接近的選項就是正確答案(必要時需要分析線索句的上一句和下一句;當線索句為段落首末句的時候,支持句為段落的其他句子)。
①用同義詞替換原文句子中某些詞語,一般不超過兩個,大體語法不變
②變換語法但是不改變原意。如主動態變被動態,定語從句還原,省略副詞等
③原文句子是否定形式,從反面敘述,而答案是正面形式,是肯定敘述
④原文從A角度敘述,答案從B角度敘述,本質不變
⑤原文是抽象概括,答案是具體案例
3、排除:排除干擾選項,再次確定正確選項。
①照抄原文,個別詞不同,不同點往往就是錯誤
②一半符合原文,一半不符合原文
③張冠李戴,混合信息
④與原文敘述相反(肯定變否定,否定變肯定)
⑤是原文中沒有出現的新信息
⑥.絕對化的表述
⑦在轉述中犯邏輯錯誤
閱讀是考研英語的半壁江山,而細節題又是閱讀的半壁江山,足見其重要性。對於2016考研沖刺的學生來說,把細節題攻克就是通關最重要的一舉。希望上面分享的方法對你有用,祝大家考研英語成功通關!