03年考研英語一閱讀text4

❶ 2006年考研英語text4解析

你把句子貼上來啊

❷ 求助 關於考研英語一真題2013年text4

Text 4
a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona's immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Aministration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the federal government and the states.
An arizona.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona's controversial plan to have state and local police enfour federal immigrations law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Anturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state police that ran to the existing federal ones.
Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun .On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately "occupied the field " and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal's privileged powers
However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That』s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.
Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.
The 8-0 objection to President Obama tures on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as 「a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power」. The White House argued tha Arizona』s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.
Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn't want to carry out Congress's immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
36. Three provisions of Arizona』s plan were overturned because they
[A] deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.
[B] disturbed the power balance between different states.
[C] overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.
[D] contradicted both the federal and state policies.
37. On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?
[A] Federal officers』 ty to withhold immigrants』information.
[B] States』 independence from federal immigration law.
[C] States』 legitimate role in immigration enforcement.
[D] Congress』s intervention in immigration enforcement.
38. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts
[A] violated the Constitution.
[B] undermined the states』 interests.
[C] supported the federal statute.
[D] stood in favor of the states.
39. The White House claims that its power of enforcement
[A] outweighs that held by the states.
[B] is dependent on the states』 support.
[C] is established by federal statutes.
[D] rarely goes against state laws.
40. What can be learned from the last paragraph?
[A] Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.
[B] Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.
[C] Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.
[D] The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.

❸ 考研英語閱讀，2007年，text4，圖裡面第一句的mystery怎麼翻譯come怎麼解釋整句

mystery字面翻譯是謎，神秘的，這里可以理解為難以置信的是、令人吃驚的是，come as surprise固定搭配版，指令人意權外的，大吃一驚的。整句話可以說是：不可思議的是（難以置信的是）這（this做主語）竟讓很多BOSS大吃一驚

❹ 考研英語閱讀，2007年，text4，Left什麼意思seen as a concern onl

這里的left應該是leave的過去分詞，until now只是插進來的，left to才是應該連在一起的，left to odd, low-level IT staff to put right, 所以這里的left to你應版該知道權是什麼意思了。
這里的seen也是see的過去分詞，而see是看的意思，所以根據文中意思，這里翻譯成"被關注"比較貼切，所以這里斷句應該是seen/as a concern/only of data-rich instries/such as banking.
所以整個句子的意思大概是：以前這些信息的保密工作一直都是留給(注意：這里的"留給"就是left to)一些沒什麼水準的員工去處理，而且只被一些涉及大量數據的行業，像銀行啊電信啊航空行業這些所關注(它的保密工作←這是我自己加的，便於你理解)。

❺ 2013年英語一閱讀text4是不是太難了點兒

2013年英復語一閱讀text4確實是非常難制了。

每年考試過後8月份或9月份公布成績並頒發成績單，根據教育部規定四六級考試不設置及格線，四級425分（含425分）以上可以報考六級，所以大家普遍認為四六級的合格線為425分。

英語四六級的分數是排位分，沒有總分。報名時間CET全國英語四六級考試的考試時間為：每年6月份、12月份（每年時間略有不同）。

2019年1月15日，中國教育部考試中心與英國文化教育協會在京聯合發布雅思、普思考試與中國英語能力等級量表對接研究結果。雅思聽力得5分，即達到中國英語能力等級量表四級水平。

❻ 考研英語真題2006 Text 4五問

一、第一句為強調句，樓主弄錯了。

二、第二句裡面what our economy depends on us forgetting在破折號裡面做我們所遺忘的what we forget的補充說明專。

三、屬這是一個省略句，大概的意思是說，到處都是這樣的人。作者用這個手法來表示他的諷刺與不滿，中文中常有沒有語法的東東，樓主不必可以強調這個，知道意思就行。

四、個人認為應該是翻譯二，因為文章開始的時候就說了藝術家比較怪異的感情傾向，因此這里應該是指代的負面感情。

五、are those/best suited for expressing joy
謂 賓 賓語補足語（其實是省略了that的從句）

再說明一下，樓主這樣讀文章，考研必敗！因為你研究的沒有一個是長難句，也並不都是出題點，更沒有很多難詞彙，熟詞僻義的，因此根本就沒有什麼研究價值。力氣要花在要點上。
而且就我看來，樓主英語基礎並不太好，這樣復習根本就不適合，還不如多看看閱讀的方法什麼的，這樣對於你做好題目，得好分數是有幫助。真的有研究英語的毅力可以等到考完了再慢慢來。

❼ 考研英語閱讀，2006，text4，這句話咋翻譯

但從19世紀的某個時候起

❽ 2002考研英語text4 第四段 無法理解

我是11年才參加過考研的，由於今年題比較簡單，分數還可以，82分
我做這篇閱讀的時候，也比較費解，不知道你是不是也是看的張劍的那本，所以當你提到這個的時候，我印象很深刻
先談你所說的問題吧，我當時對shield的理解是保護，使之免受。。。。的困惑，不知道你注意到沒有，Nancy所說的那句話，雖然是通過」 「直接引用的，但是用的是完成時，而不是習慣上的untill now are still very,very strongly insisting that 。。。。。所以，我覺得，如果翻譯成：
Nancy認為：這一原則將使那些醫生消除疑慮，在此之前，他們一直強烈地認為，如果給病人充分的葯品來止痛會加速他們的死亡的話，那就不能這樣做，（因為可能要承擔法律責任）。

而上文中，提到了最高法開始認可這一存在了幾個世紀的原則，並且醫生們也在近年開始利用這一原則為自己濫用葯品開脫。這樣，上下文，就能比較好的銜接上了。並且，我看到過一本新東方的翻譯，意思也與這個差多。

其次，我再廢話幾句吧，考研的英語，主要就是閱讀，而閱讀，又以單詞和思路最為重要，你單詞如果過關，再加上能這樣仔細的分析。相信堅持下去，會取得非常好的成績。現在，我個人覺得啊，你著重應該研究的是05-11的閱讀的，之前的，稍有一點簡單和過時。現在的閱讀，像你提到的這種，光憑單詞直譯，很難理解完全的情況越來越多。

最後，祝你成功！

❾ 考研英語閱讀，2007年，text4，Left什麼意思seen as a concern onl

這里的left應該是leave的過來去分詞，源until
now只是插進來的，left
to才是應該連在一起的，left
to
odd,
low-level
IT
staff
to
put
right,
所以這里的left
to你應該知道是什麼意思了。
這里的seen也是see的過去分詞，而see是看的意思，所以根據文中意思，這里翻譯成"被關注"比較貼切，所以這里斷句應該是seen/as
a
concern/only
of
data-rich
instries/such
as
banking.
所以整個句子的意思大概是：以前這些信息的保密工作一直都是留給(注意：這里的"留給"就是left
to)一些沒什麼水準的員工去處理，而且只被一些涉及大量數據的行業，像銀行啊電信啊航空行業這些所關注(它的保密工作←這是我自己加的，便於你理解)。

❿ 考研英語閱讀，2011年text4，第二句太難了，給點語法分析，不要翻譯

〔to……Aniston〕是主語，因為主語太長，所以採用形式主語〔it
〕