考研英語題型閱讀理解

A. 考研英語都有什麼題型都各佔多少分

第一部分 英語知識運用
該部分不僅考查考生對不同語境中規范的語言要素(包括詞彙、表達方式和結構)的掌握程度，而且還考查考生對語段特徵(如連貫性和一致性等)的辨識能力等。共20小題，每小題0.5分，共10分。
在一篇240~280詞的文章中留出20個空白，要求考生從每題給出的4個選項中選出最佳答案，使補全後的文章意思通順、前後連貫、結構完整。考生在答題卡1上作答。
第二部分 閱讀理解
該部分由A、B、C三節組成，考查考生理解書面英語的能力。共30小題，每小題2分，共60分。
A節(20小題)：主要考查考生理解主旨要義、具體信息、概念性含義，進行有關的判斷、推理和引申，根據上下文推測生詞的詞義等能力。要求考生根據所提供的4篇(總長度約為1 600詞)文章的內容，從每題所給出的4個選項中選出最佳答案。考生在答題卡1上作答。
B節(5小題)：主要考查考生對諸如連貫性、一致性等語段特徵以及文章結構的理解。本部分有3種備選題型。每次考試從這3種備選題型中選擇一種進行考查。考生在答題卡1上作答。 備選題型有：
1)本部分的內容是一篇總長度為500~600詞的文章，其中有5段空白，文章後有6~7段文字。要求考生根據文章內容從這6~7段文字中選擇能分別放進文章中5個空白處的5段。
2)在一篇長度約500~600詞的文章中，各段落的原有順序已被打亂。要求考生根據文章的內容和結構將所列段落(7~8個)重新排序，其中有2~3個段落在文章中的位置已經給出。
3)在一篇長度約500詞的文章前或後有6~7段文字或6~7個概括句或小標題。這些文字或標題分別是對文章中某一部分的概括、闡述或舉例。要求考生根據文章內容，從這6~7個選項中選出最恰當的5段文字或5個標題填入文章的空白處。
C節(5小題)*：主要考查考生准確理解概念或結構較復雜的英語文字材料的能力。要求考生閱讀一篇約400詞的文章，並將其中5個畫線部分(約150詞)譯成漢語，要求譯文准確、完整、通順。考生在答題卡2上作答。
第三部分 寫作
該部分由A、B兩節組成，主要考查考生的書面表達能力。共30分。 A節：
考生根據所給情景寫出約100詞(標點符號不計算在內)的應用性短文，包括私人和公務信函、備忘錄、報告等。
考生在答題卡2上作答。共10分。
B節：考生根據提示信息寫出一篇160~200詞的短文(標點符號不計算在內)。提示信息的形式有主題句、寫作提綱、規定情景、圖、表等。考生在答題卡2上作答。共20分。 *碩士研究生入學考試將英譯漢試題作為閱讀理解的一部分，其目的是測試考生根據上下文准確理解概念或復雜結構並用漢語正確予以表達的能力。

B. 考研英語真題：閱讀理解

考研英語真題：閱讀理解

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK "town of culture" award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in E220m of investment and an avalache of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain' town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for, the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow- village of culture ? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?

It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run "year of culture" washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community . The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organizations. But it can be done : Glasgow' s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A "town of culture" could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town's

peculiarities-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

21. Cooper and her colleagues argue that a "town of culture" award could________

[A] consolidate the town-city ties in Britain.

[B] promote cooperation among Britain's towns.

[C] increase the economic strength of Britain's towns.

[D] focus Britain's limited resources on cultural events.

22. According to Paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as________

[A] a sensible compromise.

[B] a self-deceiving attempt.

[C] an eye-catching bonus.

[D] an inaccessible target.

23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it________

[A] endeavours to maintain its image.

[B] meets the aspirations of its people.

[C] brings its local arts to prominence.

D] commits to its long-term growth.

24. Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present________

[A] a contrasting case.

[B] a supporting example.

[C] a background story,

[D] a related topic.

25. What is the author's attitude towards the proposal ?

[A] Skeptical

[B] Objective

[C] Favourable

[D] Critical

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money. Scientists need joumals in which to publish

their research, so they will supply the articles without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free, because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the proction of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only fnd a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very price sensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing instry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier, which claims to publish 25% of the scientific papers proced in the world,made profits of more than £900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than £210m in 2016 toenable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012, which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accessed, shows the legal ecosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms: either freely available from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities. Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their proct free to readers by charging their writers fees to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around ￡500 to $5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these’’article preparation costs’’ had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation. In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status, while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places. In both cases, we need a rebalancing of power.

26. Scientific publishing is seen as“a licence to print money" partly because________

[A] its funding has enjoyed a steady increase .

[B] its marketing strategy has been successful.

[C] its payment for peer review is reced.

[D] its content acquisition costs nothing.

27. According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have________

[A] thrived mainly on university libraries.

[B] gone through an existential crisis.

[C] revived the publishing instry.

[D] financed researchers generously.

28. How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

[A] Relieved.

[B] Puzzled.

[C] Concerned

[D] Encouraged.

29. It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms________

[A]allow publishers some room to make money.

[B] render publishing much easier for scientists.

[C] rece the cost of publication substantially.

[D] free universities from financial burdens.

30. Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

[A] Trial subscription is offered.

[B] Labour triumphs over status.

[C] Costs are well controlled.

D] The few feed on the many.

Text 3

Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.

A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.

Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________

[A] help little to rece gender bias.

[B] pose a threat to the state government.

[C] raise women's position in politics.

[D] greatly broaden career options.

32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?

[A] It has irritated private business owners.

[B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,

[C] It may go against the Constitution.

[D] It will settle the prior controversies.

33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____

[A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.

[B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.

[C] the pressure on women in global corporations.

[D] the needlessness of government interventions.

34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____

[A] the underestimation of elite women's role.

[B] the objection to female participation on boards.

[C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.

[D] the growing tension between labor and management.

35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

[A] Women's need in employment should be considered.

[B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.

[C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.

[D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax

on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France. Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such servces. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a“GAFA tax," meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multiational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measure, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital services tax is part of a much larger trend, with countries over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britain's DPT (diverted profits tax), Australia's MAAL (multinational antiavoidance law), and India's SEP (significant economic presence) test, to name but a few. At the same time, the European Union, Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated digital services taxes.

These unilateral developments differ in their specifics, but they are all designed to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep ;up with the current economy.

In response to these many unilateral measures, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currently working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020 on an international solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization' s work, but France's digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system.

France‘s planned tax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companies will face a cascade of different taxes from dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

36. The French Senate has passed a bill to_____

[A] regulate digital services platforms.

[B] protect French companies' interests .

[C] impose a levy on tech multinationals.

[D] curb the influence of advertising.

37. It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax _____

[A] may trigger countermeasures against France.

[B] is apt to arouse criticism at home and abroad.

[C] aims to ease international trade tensions.

[D] will prompt the tech giants to quit France.

38. The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that _____

[A] redistribution of tech giants' revenue must be ensured.

[B] the current international tax system needs upgrading.

[C] tech multinationals' monopoly should be prevented.

[D] all countries ought to enjoy equal taxing rights.

39. It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO's current work_____

[A] is being resisted by US companies.

[B] needs to be readjusted immediately.

[C] is faced with uncertain prospects.

[D] needs to in involve more countries.

40. Which of the following might be the. best title for this text?

[A] France Is Confronted with Trade Sanctions

[B] France leads the charge on Digital Tax

[C] France Says "NO" to Tech Multinationals

[D] France Demands a Role in the Digital Economy

考研英語真題：閱讀理解的內容小編就說到這里了，更多關於考研備考技巧，報名入口，報名時間，考研成績查詢，報名費用，准考證列印入口及時間等問題，小編會及時更新。希望各位考生都能進入自己的理想考研院校。希望大家能好好復習。取得佳績。

C. 考研英語閱讀六大題型

一、細節題

細節題在閱讀中考得算是最懂的一種，考研英語大概80%-90%是細節題，四六級中幾乎90%都是細節題。

細節題標志：

• 題目為不完整的陳述句

• 題目為疑問句，6 W 1 H—Who、When、Where、What、Why、Which、How

做題方法：

1、掃描題干，抓關鍵詞

容易定位的關鍵詞：人名、地名、數字、大寫字母等

2、返回原文，精確定位

99%的細節題就考對文中的一到兩句話的理解，所以找准關鍵詞進行精確定位很重要，不要看了不該看的。

3、同義替換，得出答案

選項跟文章長得像不像沒有關系，重要的是意思是不是一樣。有些選項跟文章中的某個表述長得像，但是換掉了一兩個關鍵詞就成了偷換概念。

正確答案的特徵：

• 同義替換

• 正話反說、反話正說（邏輯問題）

正確答案的性質：

1、委婉性

一切皆有可能，凡事千萬不能過於絕對。過於絕對的一定是錯誤選項，但反過來正確答案具有委婉性，有委婉性的不一定是正確答案。

2、概括性

正確選項一般包含文章中2-3個方面的意思，而錯誤選項就以偏概全或者范圍過大。

二、猜詞題

猜詞題標志：某個單詞（word）、短語（phrase）或句子（sentence）加引號，means/refers to（指的是......）

• 超綱詞-猜測

• 大綱常見詞-不選字面意思，選引申義

做題方法：不管認不認識這個詞句或短語，我們一刀切，都假裝不認識，然後返回該詞出現的上下文尋找線索，一定能找到其同義詞、近義詞、反義詞或解釋說明。

標點符號經常是解題線索：

• A，B，and C 前後意思往往是一致的

• A but B 前後意思往往是相反的

• A；B 分號表示並列關系，前後意思往往是一致的

• A：B 或 A—B或 B 都是對 A 進行解釋說明

三、推斷題

推斷題標志：題目中含infer（推斷）、imply/indicate/suggest（暗示）等詞

做題方法類似於細節題，重要的是一定要忠於原文，不能過度推理也不能主觀臆斷——文章中一定有根據，推斷題的推理只能進行最簡單的一步推理，不能進行復雜的邏輯推理。

四、例證題

例證題的關鍵是區分論點和論據：

• 論點-觀點idea；

• 論據-材料（material）、例子（example/case）

例證題標志：題目一般表述為the author/passage uses/cites=quotes/mentions the example/saying/story/somebody/something to......

做題方法：返回該論據出現的上下文（往往是上文）一定能找到其所證明的論點，而正確答案就是概論點的同義替換/正話反說/反話正說，而干擾選項經常是例子本身、就事論事。

做例證題就像打官司一樣，「想做一件事就做吧，辯護律師總會找到的」。另外做這種題，千萬不要看例子，控制住自己，如果非要看例子那就要看懂，不然好奇心害死貓。

五、態度題

態度題標志：

• 題干中往往有attitude，feel，feeling，seem等詞

• 選項都是具有感情色彩的詞

態度題一般有兩種考法：一個是考作者態度，一個是考他人態度。

做題方法：返回原文找到表示作者或他人態度情感的詞或句子（考誰找誰），有時候他人態度可以反映作者態度。

正確答案一般分三種：

• 積極的 positive

• 消極的 negative

• 客觀的，公正的 objective，impartial，impersonal

干擾項：

1、indifferent 漠不關心的、冷漠的，往往是錯誤選項

2、強烈負面情感的詞往往是錯的

biased、prejudiced偏見的，subjective主觀的，puzzling令人困惑的，gloomy黑暗的、抑鬱的，scared害怕的，conceited自負的，scornful、contemptible蔑視的、嘲笑的，permissive放縱的、縱容的

六、主旨題

主旨題標志：

• mainly about，main idea，focus on

• best title，subject=topic=theme主題

• conclusion from the passage

• 寫作目的 writing purpose，the author wants to tell us......,the passage intends to express the idea that......

做題方法：留到最後做，通讀全文找中心，一定能找到主題詞或者主題句。

1、主題詞=主角

文章中主題詞一定會復現，不一定是原詞復現，也可以是同義詞、近義詞、反義詞復現

2、主題句=論點據—起承轉合

起：開頭—文章的開頭或者段落的開頭

承：承上啟下—第二段的第一句話

轉：轉折

合：結尾—文章的結尾或段落的結尾

正確答案特徵：

1、必須具有概括性

必須能夠概括文章最核心、最本質、最主要的內容

2、必須包含主題詞（不一定是原詞）

干擾項：

• 具體細節，以偏概全

• 范圍過大

轉載於花花師姐

D. 考研英語二題型及分值

考研英語二的題型：英語知識運用、閱讀理解、英譯漢和寫作。

第一部分英語知識運用

主要考查考生對英語知識的綜合運用能力。共20小題，每小題0.5分，共10分。

在一篇約350詞的文章中留出20個空白，要求考生從每題給出的4個選項中選出最佳答案，使補全後的文章意思通順、前後連貫、結構完整。

第二部分閱讀理解

主要考查考生獲取信息、理解文章、猜測重要生詞詞義並進行推斷等方面的能力。該部分由A、B兩節組成，共25小題，每小題2分，共50分。

(4)考研英語題型閱讀理解擴展閱讀：

考研英語做題技巧

1、瀏覽選項。

瀏覽選項說的直白些，就是找選項的第一句話，抓關鍵句中的主題詞。這些主題詞的詞性多以名詞、動詞為特點。尤其要注意其中的專屬名詞和標志詞。

2、重點排查。

有些題目，在看第一遍時，就可以憑知識、閱歷選出答案。然後在接下來的題目當中，就可以按順序做題了。需要重點注意剩下的空格前後都有什麼。

3、找突破口。

一般的選項都會有主題詞，但不一定有信號詞，所以有信號詞的選項往往就是突破口。

4、核實答案。

在做完後，要進一步閱讀整篇文章。以便檢查文章的完整性和邏輯性。完整性和邏輯性較好，則說明答案正確率較高，反之則較低。總言之，整體閱讀也是一種重要的解題技巧。

E. 考研 英語有哪些題型 一共多少分

考研英語滿分100分，包括英語知識運用、閱讀理解和寫作三種題型。

英語一各題型分值：

第一部分是英語知識運用，即我們常說的完型填空，總共10分，20題，每題0.5分。

第二部分是閱讀理解，A部分是傳統閱讀理解，共4篇文章，每篇5道題，共40分。B部分是新題型，5道題共10分。C部分是翻譯，從文章中抽出5個長難句進行翻譯，5道題共10分。

第三部分是寫作。第一題是小作文，應用文寫作，要求100字左右，10分。第二題是大作文，要求160-200單詞，20分。

英語二各題型分值：

第一部分是英語知識運用，總共10分，20題，每題0.5分。

第二部分是閱讀理解，A部分是傳統閱讀理解，共4篇文章，每篇5道題，共40分。B部分是新題型，5道題共10分。C部分是翻譯，選擇一個段落進行翻譯，共15分。

第三部分是寫作。第一題是小作文，應用文協作，要求100字左右，10分。第二題是大作文，要求150單詞，15分。

(5)考研英語題型閱讀理解擴展閱讀：

英語一和英語二區別

1、考試人群不同：學術性研究生要考英語一，而一部分考專業學位的研究生將遭遇考研英語二。

2、題目類型不同：英語一試題分三部分，共52題，包括英語知識運用、閱讀理解和寫作。英語二

試題分四部分，共48題，包括英語知識運用、閱讀理解、英譯漢和寫作。

3、題目難度不同，一般情況下英語二的難度要略低於英語一。

F. 考研英語一和英語二題型有什麼區別

1、難度上的不同：復

總體來說考研英語制一的難度還是比考研英語二高一些，不僅考察的方向不同，難度上也有很大的區別，畢竟學術型碩士還是比專業型碩士的難度要高一些。

在試卷上考研英語一的閱讀理解更加抽象，需要考生擁有更深層次的理解能力，題型也有比較多的細節題目，而考研英語二的閱讀理解就更簡單一些，題目也更為淺顯一點。

2、詞彙量的不同：

雖然考研英語一和考研英語二大綱中的閱讀理解單詞量相同，但是在正經的考試中明顯的英語二的閱考研英語二大綱中的閱讀理解單詞量相同；

但是在正經的考試中明顯的英語二的閱讀理解不會有超過大綱的單詞，但是在考研英語一的試卷中卻會出現將近百分之三的超綱單詞量。

3、閱讀理解的不同：

考研英語一在閱讀理解中要求相對會高一些，在內容的豐富程度考察上也會更加嚴格一些，會出現一些比較抽象復雜的概念，而考研英語二中就會使比較簡單的寬泛的意義，相對更加好理解，不會對文章進行引申義的補充。

G. 考研英語各題分值

考研英語一：

1、英語知識運用：共20小題，每小題0.5分，共10分。在一篇240-280詞的文章中留出20個空白，要求考生從每題給出的4個選項中選出最佳答案。

2、閱讀理解：該部分由A、B、C三節組成，共30小題，每小題2分，共60分。考查考生理解書面英語的能力。

3、寫作：該部分由A、B兩節組成，共30分。主要考查考生的書面表達能力。

考研英語二：

1、英語知識運用：共20小題，每小題0.5分，共10分。考查考生對英語知識的綜合運用能力。在一篇約350詞的文章中留出20個空白，要求考生從每題所給的4個選項中選出最佳答案。

2、閱讀理解：該部分由A、B兩節組成，共25小題，每小題2分，共50分。主要是考查考生獲取信息、理解文章、猜測重要生詞詞義並進行推斷等方面的能力。

3、英譯漢：共15分。要求考生閱讀、理解長度為150詞左右的一個或幾個英語段落，並將其全部譯成漢語。

3、寫作：共2小題，共25分。A部分10分，B部分15分。主要考查考生的書面表達能力。

(7)考研英語題型閱讀理解擴展閱讀：

考研英語的復習方法：

1、新題型主要是考察考生對考點空格前後句子關聯的把握。因此要很好地把握文章里單句之間的關系，因為這種關系很重要，以方便考察兩種題。一是七選五，二是段落排序。

2、新題型主要是從全局角度考察大家對文章邏輯的把握，要求考生從整體上把握文章的邏輯結構和內容上的聯系，理解句子之間、段落之間的關系，對諸如連貫性、一致性等語段特徵有較強的意識和熟練的把握，並具備運用語法知識分析和理解長難句的能力。

3、在一個段落裡面，如何把握總體上講了什麼東西，這是考生平常閱讀里欠缺的一個能力。建議多多練習提煉段落大意的能力，可以嘗試每次看完一個段落就用簡短漢語或者英文把段落主旨寫在段落旁邊。

參考資料來源：網路—考研英語

H. 考研英語閱讀理解考查題型有哪些

閱讀理解A(一般閱讀理解，從小到大做的那種)，4篇
40分
閱讀理解B（近幾年來一直是七選五，超難）
10分
閱讀理解C（翻譯
英譯漢五個
）
10分