14年考研英語閱讀理解

① 考研英語試卷中閱讀文章都是出自哪裡

根據數據統計，80%的考研英語閱讀來源於《經濟學人》、《衛報》、《自然雜志》、《新聞周刊》、《科學美國人》等。偶爾也會在一些書籍中尋找合適的文字做考試素材，但不多見，尤其是這幾年已經很難見到。

其中社會科學是考研英語閱讀的主要和重點選材，自然科學一直保持在 1 篇文章左右的分量，人文科學的重要性則有上升的趨勢。

(1)14年考研英語閱讀理解擴展閱讀：

考研英語閱讀文章內容分析

從體裁上看，大綱要求考生能夠順利讀懂四類文章，分別為議論文、說明文、記敘文和應用文。不過，考研閱讀理解的文章大多為說明文或者議論文。針對這兩類文章，應該有不同的閱讀重點和策略。

另外在絕大多數情況下，歷年真題的文章來源一般控制在過去的5年之內，即倘若2007年參加考研的話，2007年的文章一般來自於2001年到2006年之間的報刊雜志上。

但近五年的真題來源有所改變，一般選自過去兩年內的雜志，甚至一年內的居多，可見文章的時效性越來越明顯，所以閱讀的范圍也就小了很多。

英語閱讀真題文章一般字數上控制在450字到550字之間，段落上一般控制在3到6個段落。所以可以把精力主要集中在符合前面字數、段落以及年份的文章來進行復習和閱讀，如此一來就把復習的范圍大為減少了。

② 開始做考研英語閱讀了，做了好幾套了，可是每次都是每篇錯兩個，我快受不了了。。

很多考生總會問我這樣一個問題：老師考研英語閱讀理解就這么幾套這題，做完之後，答案都記住了，就沒有價值了。我可不可以先做模擬題，到了最後再做真題。我說：「不行！考研真題是用來研究的，不是用來做的！」聞聽此話的同學一臉茫然，我對他們微微一笑，然後做出如下解釋。

考研英語閱讀理解一定要做到精讀，精讀步驟需要做到以下幾點：

1、做真題、對照答案糾正對錯、理解為什麼選和不選

（1）做題

剛開始做考研英語閱讀理解，大家可以拋開時間觀念，做完即可。但是在做完4套真題之後，建議大家按照考試時間來做，即70－80分鍾之內搞定4篇閱讀理解。畢竟閱讀理解速度就是關鍵。

（2）糾正答案

對照真題給出的答案，理解為什麼對為什麼錯。第一步大功告成。

2、查出所有生詞，整理生詞本

大家可以利用「有道」將自己真題中不認識的單詞查出來，然後整理到筆記本上，這個詞彙本是後期要反復看的，目的是增加詞彙量。後期大家還可以將生詞進行歸類，分為經濟詞彙、法律詞彙、科技詞彙等，將詞義相同反復出現的單詞也可以進行歸類。

3、查出並整理片語

真題中一定有大量的片語包括固定搭配，需要用「有道」查出來，然後整理到筆記本中。有的片語反復重復出現，可以後期做同義歸類。

4、整理並理解長難句

真題中的大量長難句要整理到筆記本中，然後做翻譯。這個過程可以增加長難句破解和翻譯的能力。大家可以將句中考到的語法點作分類總結，發現不懂的要及時解決，特別對於不懂的語法點要及時解決，以此提高自己的語法破解能力。

5、用彩色筆在原文中標記出每個題目對應的出題位置，並且寫上題號

這個工作可以讓大家清楚理解出題人喜歡在文中什麼位置和什麼特點的句子中出題，大家還需要對照原文中的句子和題目中的最佳選項做同義替換，看清楚最佳選項和原句是什麼關系。哪些單詞做了改動，哪些單詞沒有改動，干擾選項的出處在哪裡。做到對最佳選項產生熟悉感。

6、翻譯真題

直接對照原文在筆記本上進行翻譯即可，不必抄一句英文翻譯一句漢語。翻譯完畢之後，換另外一支顏色的筆，在筆記本上對照真題翻譯原文做修改工作。通過這個過程糾正自己的翻譯思維，增加翻譯能力。

7、挑選出可以用在寫作中的詞、片語、句子甚至段落，然後進行背誦以及寫作仿寫訓練，增加自己的寫作能力。

8、每天朗讀翻譯過的文章，如果有能力，好的文章自然可以背誦。當然，朗讀為主！

9、弄懂每個題目的考點及解題思路，加深理解選項為什麼選和不選。

只要做好以上九個方面，英語閱讀理解真題才算是掌握比較透徹。大家加油！

③ 考研英語#閱讀理解有多變態

關於考研英語你首先需要了解的是考研英語分為英語一和英語二，英語一的閱讀理內解確實很變態，不過英語二的閱容讀理解還是容易很多，算不上變態。英語一的閱讀理解大多數人剛開始刷的時候都是看自己對了幾個，因為幾乎就只會對幾個。而英語本身不好的有可能在閱讀中全軍覆沒，不過也不用太著急，通過准備練習，後期還是都會有所提升的，只要肯花時間。

對於考研英語，經過大部分人總結的經驗就是刷真題，一遍一遍的刷，把真題中的每個生詞，每個長難句都搞懂，你就不會覺得閱讀理解變態了。不過剛開始可能會覺得有點費時，但是一定要堅持，因為這是最有效的方法。

④ 2013年考研英語一閱讀新題型答案

英語卷子有很多套，就是所謂的一題多卷，完型、閱讀、新題型都是的
就是題目是一樣專的但是選屬項的順序不一樣，可能你的A項在我的卷子上是D項，就是為了防止作弊
所以網上的卷子只是某一個版本
不信你打開不同機構提供的真題卷子對比一下就知道了

⑤ 2014考研英語二閱讀text3真題及答案

完復____8
善____4，仔細
教____0
師____5
資____2，拔了制毛的鴿子
格____7
達____6
案____8，飛不了。
叩____4
每過一天，我就在日歷上打個圈。到星期天的時候，才發現日子被我過成了省略號。

⑥ 考研英語真題：閱讀理解

考研英語真題：閱讀理解

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK "town of culture" award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in E220m of investment and an avalache of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain' town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for, the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow- village of culture ? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?

It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run "year of culture" washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community . The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organizations. But it can be done : Glasgow' s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A "town of culture" could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town's

peculiarities-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

21. Cooper and her colleagues argue that a "town of culture" award could________

[A] consolidate the town-city ties in Britain.

[B] promote cooperation among Britain's towns.

[C] increase the economic strength of Britain's towns.

[D] focus Britain's limited resources on cultural events.

22. According to Paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as________

[A] a sensible compromise.

[B] a self-deceiving attempt.

[C] an eye-catching bonus.

[D] an inaccessible target.

23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it________

[A] endeavours to maintain its image.

[B] meets the aspirations of its people.

[C] brings its local arts to prominence.

D] commits to its long-term growth.

24. Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present________

[A] a contrasting case.

[B] a supporting example.

[C] a background story,

[D] a related topic.

25. What is the author's attitude towards the proposal ?

[A] Skeptical

[B] Objective

[C] Favourable

[D] Critical

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money. Scientists need joumals in which to publish

their research, so they will supply the articles without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free, because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the proction of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only fnd a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very price sensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing instry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier, which claims to publish 25% of the scientific papers proced in the world,made profits of more than £900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than £210m in 2016 toenable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012, which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accessed, shows the legal ecosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms: either freely available from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities. Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their proct free to readers by charging their writers fees to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around ￡500 to $5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these’’article preparation costs’’ had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation. In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status, while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places. In both cases, we need a rebalancing of power.

26. Scientific publishing is seen as“a licence to print money" partly because________

[A] its funding has enjoyed a steady increase .

[B] its marketing strategy has been successful.

[C] its payment for peer review is reced.

[D] its content acquisition costs nothing.

27. According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have________

[A] thrived mainly on university libraries.

[B] gone through an existential crisis.

[C] revived the publishing instry.

[D] financed researchers generously.

28. How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

[A] Relieved.

[B] Puzzled.

[C] Concerned

[D] Encouraged.

29. It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms________

[A]allow publishers some room to make money.

[B] render publishing much easier for scientists.

[C] rece the cost of publication substantially.

[D] free universities from financial burdens.

30. Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

[A] Trial subscription is offered.

[B] Labour triumphs over status.

[C] Costs are well controlled.

D] The few feed on the many.

Text 3

Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.

A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.

Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________

[A] help little to rece gender bias.

[B] pose a threat to the state government.

[C] raise women's position in politics.

[D] greatly broaden career options.

32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?

[A] It has irritated private business owners.

[B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,

[C] It may go against the Constitution.

[D] It will settle the prior controversies.

33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____

[A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.

[B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.

[C] the pressure on women in global corporations.

[D] the needlessness of government interventions.

34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____

[A] the underestimation of elite women's role.

[B] the objection to female participation on boards.

[C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.

[D] the growing tension between labor and management.

35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

[A] Women's need in employment should be considered.

[B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.

[C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.

[D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax

on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France. Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such servces. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a“GAFA tax," meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multiational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measure, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital services tax is part of a much larger trend, with countries over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britain's DPT (diverted profits tax), Australia's MAAL (multinational antiavoidance law), and India's SEP (significant economic presence) test, to name but a few. At the same time, the European Union, Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated digital services taxes.

These unilateral developments differ in their specifics, but they are all designed to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep ;up with the current economy.

In response to these many unilateral measures, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currently working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020 on an international solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization' s work, but France's digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system.

France‘s planned tax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companies will face a cascade of different taxes from dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

36. The French Senate has passed a bill to_____

[A] regulate digital services platforms.

[B] protect French companies' interests .

[C] impose a levy on tech multinationals.

[D] curb the influence of advertising.

37. It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax _____

[A] may trigger countermeasures against France.

[B] is apt to arouse criticism at home and abroad.

[C] aims to ease international trade tensions.

[D] will prompt the tech giants to quit France.

38. The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that _____

[A] redistribution of tech giants' revenue must be ensured.

[B] the current international tax system needs upgrading.

[C] tech multinationals' monopoly should be prevented.

[D] all countries ought to enjoy equal taxing rights.

39. It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO's current work_____

[A] is being resisted by US companies.

[B] needs to be readjusted immediately.

[C] is faced with uncertain prospects.

[D] needs to in involve more countries.

40. Which of the following might be the. best title for this text?

[A] France Is Confronted with Trade Sanctions

[B] France leads the charge on Digital Tax

[C] France Says "NO" to Tech Multinationals

[D] France Demands a Role in the Digital Economy

考研英語真題：閱讀理解的內容小編就說到這里了，更多關於考研備考技巧，報名入口，報名時間，考研成績查詢，報名費用，准考證列印入口及時間等問題，小編會及時更新。希望各位考生都能進入自己的理想考研院校。希望大家能好好復習。取得佳績。

⑦ 考研英語閱讀理解一般平均幾分鍾一篇啊

考研英語一共3個小時，閱讀4篇單選的那種，平均一篇18-20分鍾左右。 不過閱讀佔分比挺高的，可以把其他的做快點，閱讀多留點時間。
希望對你有幫助

⑧ 2014年考研英語閱讀理解都錯了5個，這個水平算什麼檔次

我2014年考研67，北京批改的嚴，閱讀錯了6個，希望你借鑒下