英語考研閱讀理解原文

『壹』 考研英語閱讀原文

考研英語閱讀文抄章都是命題老師修改過的，不符合外國人語言表達習慣，且多處結構混亂，邏輯不通，就如同把一個人肢解後重新拼湊起來的一個血淋淋的怪物，不建議聽，學習這些文章雖然對考研有利，但英語水平會降低，最好還是放棄考研。

『貳』 考研英語誰的閱讀理解講的比較好誰的書比較好

主要看你選擇在哪家機構吧，有些機構的老師你會發現老師是一樣的，因為沒有屬於自己的名師。有些老師還是很不錯的，主要看自己的需求。

『叄』 考研英語試卷中閱讀文章都是出自哪裡

根據數據統計，80%的考研英語閱讀來源於《經濟學人》、《衛報》、《自然雜志》、《新聞周刊》、《科學美國人》等。偶爾也會在一些書籍中尋找合適的文字做考試素材，但不多見，尤其是這幾年已經很難見到。

其中社會科學是考研英語閱讀的主要和重點選材，自然科學一直保持在 1 篇文章左右的分量，人文科學的重要性則有上升的趨勢。

(3)英語考研閱讀理解原文擴展閱讀：

考研英語閱讀文章內容分析

從體裁上看，大綱要求考生能夠順利讀懂四類文章，分別為議論文、說明文、記敘文和應用文。不過，考研閱讀理解的文章大多為說明文或者議論文。針對這兩類文章，應該有不同的閱讀重點和策略。

另外在絕大多數情況下，歷年真題的文章來源一般控制在過去的5年之內，即倘若2007年參加考研的話，2007年的文章一般來自於2001年到2006年之間的報刊雜志上。

但近五年的真題來源有所改變，一般選自過去兩年內的雜志，甚至一年內的居多，可見文章的時效性越來越明顯，所以閱讀的范圍也就小了很多。

英語閱讀真題文章一般字數上控制在450字到550字之間，段落上一般控制在3到6個段落。所以可以把精力主要集中在符合前面字數、段落以及年份的文章來進行復習和閱讀，如此一來就把復習的范圍大為減少了。

『肆』 考研英語閱讀理解答題技巧。

第一步：快速劃出段落序號以及各段首句。
第二步：閱讀首段，了解文章主題（Theme）。
宏觀把握，隨機應變，根據第一段內容，才能更好的給定位打下基礎。
第三步：掃描題干，盡量找出題干能夠提供的信息（Key Words）1分鍾
定位詞的優先考慮順序:
1、首先標出明確告訴位置的題目所在（某段某行）。
2、專有名詞優先，包括人名、地名、書名以及帶引號的詞等 。
3、數字、時間、時段（包括某些介詞短語）。
4、較長、較復雜的片語（名詞動詞片語優先） 。
5、重要的動詞、形容詞或副詞等實詞 。
6、條件詞、因果詞、比較詞等虛詞（往往起到輔助作用） 。
第四步：變速瀏覽原文，抓住中心。
注意把握三個閱讀原則：
原則一：首段原則（文章的第一段逐字讀明白，可以反復和回讀）。
原則二：首末句原則（其餘各段的首尾句要細讀，其他各句正常閱讀即可）。
原則三：「路標」原則。所謂路標詞，就是表示作者思想銜接和轉折的功能詞彙。
第五步：仔細審題，定位原文。
原則一：關鍵詞定位原則 。
原則二：自然段定位原則 。
原則三：長難句定位原則。
注意一：關鍵詞在原文可能是原詞本身，也可能是關鍵詞的同義詞。
注意二：問原因的問題，一般問主要原因（major reason）。
注意三：「邪惡的眼睛」（in the eyes of），注意問的是誰的觀點和態度。

『伍』 英語考研幾篇閱讀理解

英語考研一共是4篇閱讀理解，分值是40分
難度一般是第一篇較為簡單，越往後越難。

『陸』 考研英語真題：閱讀理解

考研英語真題：閱讀理解

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK "town of culture" award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in E220m of investment and an avalache of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain' town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for, the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow- village of culture ? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?

It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run "year of culture" washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community . The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organizations. But it can be done : Glasgow' s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A "town of culture" could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town's

peculiarities-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

21. Cooper and her colleagues argue that a "town of culture" award could________

[A] consolidate the town-city ties in Britain.

[B] promote cooperation among Britain's towns.

[C] increase the economic strength of Britain's towns.

[D] focus Britain's limited resources on cultural events.

22. According to Paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as________

[A] a sensible compromise.

[B] a self-deceiving attempt.

[C] an eye-catching bonus.

[D] an inaccessible target.

23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it________

[A] endeavours to maintain its image.

[B] meets the aspirations of its people.

[C] brings its local arts to prominence.

D] commits to its long-term growth.

24. Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present________

[A] a contrasting case.

[B] a supporting example.

[C] a background story,

[D] a related topic.

25. What is the author's attitude towards the proposal ?

[A] Skeptical

[B] Objective

[C] Favourable

[D] Critical

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money. Scientists need joumals in which to publish

their research, so they will supply the articles without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free, because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the proction of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only fnd a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very price sensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing instry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier, which claims to publish 25% of the scientific papers proced in the world,made profits of more than £900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than £210m in 2016 toenable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012, which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accessed, shows the legal ecosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms: either freely available from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities. Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their proct free to readers by charging their writers fees to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around ￡500 to $5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these’’article preparation costs’’ had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation. In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status, while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places. In both cases, we need a rebalancing of power.

26. Scientific publishing is seen as“a licence to print money" partly because________

[A] its funding has enjoyed a steady increase .

[B] its marketing strategy has been successful.

[C] its payment for peer review is reced.

[D] its content acquisition costs nothing.

27. According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have________

[A] thrived mainly on university libraries.

[B] gone through an existential crisis.

[C] revived the publishing instry.

[D] financed researchers generously.

28. How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

[A] Relieved.

[B] Puzzled.

[C] Concerned

[D] Encouraged.

29. It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms________

[A]allow publishers some room to make money.

[B] render publishing much easier for scientists.

[C] rece the cost of publication substantially.

[D] free universities from financial burdens.

30. Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

[A] Trial subscription is offered.

[B] Labour triumphs over status.

[C] Costs are well controlled.

D] The few feed on the many.

Text 3

Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.

A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.

Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________

[A] help little to rece gender bias.

[B] pose a threat to the state government.

[C] raise women's position in politics.

[D] greatly broaden career options.

32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?

[A] It has irritated private business owners.

[B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,

[C] It may go against the Constitution.

[D] It will settle the prior controversies.

33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____

[A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.

[B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.

[C] the pressure on women in global corporations.

[D] the needlessness of government interventions.

34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____

[A] the underestimation of elite women's role.

[B] the objection to female participation on boards.

[C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.

[D] the growing tension between labor and management.

35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

[A] Women's need in employment should be considered.

[B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.

[C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.

[D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax

on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France. Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such servces. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a“GAFA tax," meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multiational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measure, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital services tax is part of a much larger trend, with countries over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britain's DPT (diverted profits tax), Australia's MAAL (multinational antiavoidance law), and India's SEP (significant economic presence) test, to name but a few. At the same time, the European Union, Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated digital services taxes.

These unilateral developments differ in their specifics, but they are all designed to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep ;up with the current economy.

In response to these many unilateral measures, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currently working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020 on an international solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization' s work, but France's digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system.

France‘s planned tax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companies will face a cascade of different taxes from dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

36. The French Senate has passed a bill to_____

[A] regulate digital services platforms.

[B] protect French companies' interests .

[C] impose a levy on tech multinationals.

[D] curb the influence of advertising.

37. It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax _____

[A] may trigger countermeasures against France.

[B] is apt to arouse criticism at home and abroad.

[C] aims to ease international trade tensions.

[D] will prompt the tech giants to quit France.

38. The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that _____

[A] redistribution of tech giants' revenue must be ensured.

[B] the current international tax system needs upgrading.

[C] tech multinationals' monopoly should be prevented.

[D] all countries ought to enjoy equal taxing rights.

39. It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO's current work_____

[A] is being resisted by US companies.

[B] needs to be readjusted immediately.

[C] is faced with uncertain prospects.

[D] needs to in involve more countries.

40. Which of the following might be the. best title for this text?

[A] France Is Confronted with Trade Sanctions

[B] France leads the charge on Digital Tax

[C] France Says "NO" to Tech Multinationals

[D] France Demands a Role in the Digital Economy

考研英語真題：閱讀理解的內容小編就說到這里了，更多關於考研備考技巧，報名入口，報名時間，考研成績查詢，報名費用，准考證列印入口及時間等問題，小編會及時更新。希望各位考生都能進入自己的理想考研院校。希望大家能好好復習。取得佳績。

『柒』 考研英語閱讀六大題型

一、細節題

細節題在閱讀中考得算是最懂的一種，考研英語大概80%-90%是細節題，四六級中幾乎90%都是細節題。

細節題標志：

• 題目為不完整的陳述句

• 題目為疑問句，6 W 1 H—Who、When、Where、What、Why、Which、How

做題方法：

1、掃描題干，抓關鍵詞

容易定位的關鍵詞：人名、地名、數字、大寫字母等

2、返回原文，精確定位

99%的細節題就考對文中的一到兩句話的理解，所以找准關鍵詞進行精確定位很重要，不要看了不該看的。

3、同義替換，得出答案

選項跟文章長得像不像沒有關系，重要的是意思是不是一樣。有些選項跟文章中的某個表述長得像，但是換掉了一兩個關鍵詞就成了偷換概念。

正確答案的特徵：

• 同義替換

• 正話反說、反話正說（邏輯問題）

正確答案的性質：

1、委婉性

一切皆有可能，凡事千萬不能過於絕對。過於絕對的一定是錯誤選項，但反過來正確答案具有委婉性，有委婉性的不一定是正確答案。

2、概括性

正確選項一般包含文章中2-3個方面的意思，而錯誤選項就以偏概全或者范圍過大。

二、猜詞題

猜詞題標志：某個單詞（word）、短語（phrase）或句子（sentence）加引號，means/refers to（指的是......）

• 超綱詞-猜測

• 大綱常見詞-不選字面意思，選引申義

做題方法：不管認不認識這個詞句或短語，我們一刀切，都假裝不認識，然後返回該詞出現的上下文尋找線索，一定能找到其同義詞、近義詞、反義詞或解釋說明。

標點符號經常是解題線索：

• A，B，and C 前後意思往往是一致的

• A but B 前後意思往往是相反的

• A；B 分號表示並列關系，前後意思往往是一致的

• A：B 或 A—B或 B 都是對 A 進行解釋說明

三、推斷題

推斷題標志：題目中含infer（推斷）、imply/indicate/suggest（暗示）等詞

做題方法類似於細節題，重要的是一定要忠於原文，不能過度推理也不能主觀臆斷——文章中一定有根據，推斷題的推理只能進行最簡單的一步推理，不能進行復雜的邏輯推理。

四、例證題

例證題的關鍵是區分論點和論據：

• 論點-觀點idea；

• 論據-材料（material）、例子（example/case）

例證題標志：題目一般表述為the author/passage uses/cites=quotes/mentions the example/saying/story/somebody/something to......

做題方法：返回該論據出現的上下文（往往是上文）一定能找到其所證明的論點，而正確答案就是概論點的同義替換/正話反說/反話正說，而干擾選項經常是例子本身、就事論事。

做例證題就像打官司一樣，「想做一件事就做吧，辯護律師總會找到的」。另外做這種題，千萬不要看例子，控制住自己，如果非要看例子那就要看懂，不然好奇心害死貓。

五、態度題

態度題標志：

• 題干中往往有attitude，feel，feeling，seem等詞

• 選項都是具有感情色彩的詞

態度題一般有兩種考法：一個是考作者態度，一個是考他人態度。

做題方法：返回原文找到表示作者或他人態度情感的詞或句子（考誰找誰），有時候他人態度可以反映作者態度。

正確答案一般分三種：

• 積極的 positive

• 消極的 negative

• 客觀的，公正的 objective，impartial，impersonal

干擾項：

1、indifferent 漠不關心的、冷漠的，往往是錯誤選項

2、強烈負面情感的詞往往是錯的

biased、prejudiced偏見的，subjective主觀的，puzzling令人困惑的，gloomy黑暗的、抑鬱的，scared害怕的，conceited自負的，scornful、contemptible蔑視的、嘲笑的，permissive放縱的、縱容的

六、主旨題

主旨題標志：

• mainly about，main idea，focus on

• best title，subject=topic=theme主題

• conclusion from the passage

• 寫作目的 writing purpose，the author wants to tell us......,the passage intends to express the idea that......

做題方法：留到最後做，通讀全文找中心，一定能找到主題詞或者主題句。

1、主題詞=主角

文章中主題詞一定會復現，不一定是原詞復現，也可以是同義詞、近義詞、反義詞復現

2、主題句=論點據—起承轉合

起：開頭—文章的開頭或者段落的開頭

承：承上啟下—第二段的第一句話

轉：轉折

合：結尾—文章的結尾或段落的結尾

正確答案特徵：

1、必須具有概括性

必須能夠概括文章最核心、最本質、最主要的內容

2、必須包含主題詞（不一定是原詞）

干擾項：

• 具體細節，以偏概全

• 范圍過大

轉載於花花師姐

『捌』 考研英語閱讀理解錯的太多了，怎麼辦

可以多總結一下錯題多是哪一類型的，將做題技巧融會貫通到平常的做題中，也可以多和研友交流一下經驗。以下是考研英語閱讀理解的做題技巧：

一．考研閱讀的基本解題思路：（四步走）

第一，掃描提干，劃關鍵項。

第二， 通讀全文，抓住中心。

1. 通讀全文，抓兩個重點：

①首段（中心句、核心概念常在第一段，常在首段出題）；

②其他各段的段首和段尾句。（其他部分略讀，有重點的讀）

2. 抓住中心，用一分半時間思考3個問題：

①文章敘述的主要內容是什麼？

②文章中有無提到核心概念？

③作者的大致態度是什麼？

第三，仔細審題，返回原文。（仔細看題干，把每道題和原文的某處建立聯系，掛起鉤）

定位原則：

①通常是由題干出發，使用尋找關鍵詞定位原則。（關鍵詞：大寫字母、地名、時間、數字等）

②自然段定位原則。出題的順序與行文的順序是基本一致的，一般每段對應一題。

要樹立定位意識，每一題、每一選項都要回到原文中某一處定位。

第四，重疊選項，得出答案。（重疊原文=對照原文）

1. 通過題干返回原文：判斷四個選項，抓住選項中的關鍵詞，把選項定位到原文的某處比較，重疊選項，選出答案。

2.作題練習要求：要有選一個答案的理由和其餘三個不選的理由

二．閱讀理解的解題技巧

1. 例證題 ：

① 例證題的標記。當題干中出現example, case, illustrate, illustration, exemplify 時。

② 返回原文，找出該例證所在的位置，既給該例子定位。

③ 搜索該例證周圍的區域，90%向上，10%向下，找出該例證支持的觀點。例子周圍具有概括抽象性的表達通常就是它的論點。

注意：舉例的目的是為了支持論點或是為了說明主題句。舉例後馬上問這個例子說明了什麼問題？不能用例子中的話來回答這個問題。

④ 找出該論點，並與四個選項比較，得出選項中與該論點最一致的答案。

⑤ 例證題錯誤答案設計的干擾特徵經常是：就事論事。

? 即用例子中的某一內容拉出來讓你去選。（╳）

要求：在閱讀中，遇到長的例子，立即給這個例子定位，即找出起始點，從哪開始到哪結束。

2. 指代題 ：

① 返回原文，找出出題的指代詞。

② 向上搜索，找最近的名詞、名詞性短語或句子（先從最近點開始找，找不到再找次近的，一般答案不會離得太遠）。

③ 將找到的詞、片語或句子的意思代入替換該指代詞，看其意思是否通順。

④ 將找到的詞、片語或句子與四個選項進行比較，找出最佳答案。

3. 詞彙題 ：「搜索代入」法

① 返回原文，找出該詞彙出現的地方。

② 確定該詞彙的詞性

③ 從上下文（詞彙的前後幾句）中找到與所給詞彙具有相同詞性的詞（如一下子找不到就再往上往下找），代入所給

詞彙在文章中的位置（將之替換）看語義是否合適

④ 找出選項中與代替詞意思相同或相近的選相，即答案

注意：a.如果該詞彙是簡單詞彙，則其字面意思必然不是正確答案。

b.考研閱讀不是考察字認識不認識，而是考察是否能根據上下文作出正確的判斷。

c.詞彙題的正確答案經常蘊藏在原文該詞彙出現的附近。注意不能靠單詞詞義直接往下推。

d.尋找時要注意同位語、特殊標點（比如分號，分號前後兩句話的邏輯關系不是形式上的並列就是語義上的並列，也就是兩句話的意思相同，所以可用其中一句話的意思來推測 另一句話的意思從而推出所給詞彙含義）、定語從句、前後綴，特別要注意尋找時的同性原則。比如：讓猜一個名詞片語（動詞片語）的意思，我們就向上向下搜索名詞片語（動詞片語）。

隱蔽型詞彙題：題干與原文的某句完全重合，只有一兩個詞被替換掉。隱蔽型詞彙題的做法跟詞彙題的做法幾乎一樣，往上往下找。

4. 句子理解題 ：

① 返回原文找到原句。

② 對原句進行語法和詞義的精確分析（找主幹），應該重點抓原句的字面含義。若該句的字面含義不能確定，則依據上下文進行判斷。注意：局部含義是由整體決定的。

③ 一般來說，選項中的正確答案與原句意思完全相同，只不過用其他英語詞彙換種表達而已。

④ 句子理解題的錯誤選項干擾項特徵：推得過遠。做題時應把握住推的度。

思路： 對句子微觀分析? 不行就依據上下文? 選擇時不要推得過遠。

5. 推理題 ：「最近原則」

① 標志： learn, infer, imply, inform

② 看是否可以通過題干返回原文或依據選項返回原文。一般要圍繞文中的一兩個重點進行推理。推理題無論通過題干能不能定位，我們都要把它固化到文章的一兩點上。

③ 依據原文的意思進行三錯一對的判斷。先不要進行推理，若有一個選項跟原文的意思一模一樣，

則該選項必然是正確答案。推理題不是考察我們的想像力，它實際是考察我們原文中的某幾個點

如一個、兩個點所涉及的問題我們讀透了沒有。因此，不推的比推的好；推的近的比推的遠的要好。

④ 推理題的最近答案原則：不推的要比推的好，推的近的要比推的遠的好，直接推出的要比間接推的好。(原文的某句話變個說法)

注意：做題時不能想得太多，推得過遠。是否把原文讀懂才是關鍵。

6. 主旨題 ： 「串線摘帽」

即在自然段少的時候串串線，串線法解不出來時，大帽子、小帽子摘一下。

① 主旨題的標志：mainly about, mainly discuss, the best title

② 串線法：抓首段和其餘各段的第

③ 小心首段陷阱。

④ 主旨題錯誤選項的干擾特徵經常是：

⑴ 局部信息，即選項的內容小於文章的內容；

⑵ 范圍過寬，即選項的內容大於文章的內容。

⑤逆向思維法、快速作文法：在兩個選項看上去都十分正確無法選擇時，試著從選項出發，想像一下如果自己以此選項來寫文章會有那些內容，然後把它與文章的內容比較，接近的即為正確選項。

7. 作者態度題 ：

① 標志：attitude

② 應精確理解四個選項的含義。

③ 不要摻雜自己的觀點。

④ 可以尋找文中一些具有感情色彩的詞。如：fortunately, excessively, too many.

⑤ 舉例的方式。

⑥ 抓論述的主線。把第一段讀透，把其他各段的段首段尾句拉出來，看整個文章的謀篇結構。

⑦ 做作者態度題時特別注意：首先看清楚是誰對誰的態度。

8. 判斷題 ：

①看可否通過四個選項具體化到文中一點或者根據自然段原則定位。

②每個選項都應返回原文，不能憑主觀印象進行判斷。

③要重點抓是「三錯一對」還是「三對一錯」的關系（做題是要看清題目）。

9. 細節題 ：

看完題目回到原文，重疊原文，得出答案

10.重點題型中的幾個問題：

① 詞彙題：字面意思不是答案，要根據上下文推測其深刻含義

② 句子理解題：一般不要求推理，只看句子本身。

③ 推理題：答案很大程度上是原文的重現，不一定非要經過邏輯推理從原文中得出。

11. 正確答案的特徵：

① 正確答案經常與中心思想有關。

② 正確答案的位置，最常見的三個位置是：段首段尾處、轉折處、因果處。

③ 正確答案經常運用的原則是：同義替換、正話反說、反話正說。

④ 從語氣角度來看，正確答案中經常含有不肯定的語氣詞和委婉表達的用詞。如：can, may, might, possible, not necessarily, some.

⑤ 正確答案經常具有概括性、深刻性，不能只見樹木不見森林。

12. 錯誤答案的特徵：

第一大層次：① 無中生有 （未提及的概念）；

② 正反混淆 （選項的意思跟原文的意思正好相反）；

③ 所答非所問 （雖然選項的說法沒有問題，符合原文，但和題干搭不上邊）

第二大層次：① 過分絕對；② 擴大范圍（注意隱蔽型的擴大范圍mostly）；③ 因果倒置；

④ 常識判斷；⑤ 推得過遠；⑥ 偏離中心；⑦ 變換詞性。

常識判斷：如果一個選項僅僅符合常識，不一定是正確答案